Level crossing causing "bedlam" say commuters (From Basildon Recorder)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us »
Level crossing causing "bedlam" say commuters
12:00pm Thursday 17th January 2013 in News By Gina Marden
IRATE residents and drivers in Stanford-le-Hope say barriers at the train station are being left down for half-an-hour at a time, causing “bedlam” in the mornings.
The Echo has been contacted by several people about delays at the level crossing, in London Road, which they say have been occurring since before Christmas.
Stanford-le-Hope resident Elaine Hobson missed her train last Thursday because the barrier was down from 8.01am to 8.30am, they were down for a similar period the day before too.
She said: “This has been happening on and off for about three months.
“Apparently the problem is caused when a train terminates at the station.
“The barriers used to go back up straight away so traffic could go through, but whoever is controlling them now just leaves them down until the train is gone.
“People are missing two or three trains a day, parents are complaining as they are late taking their children to school, taxi firms are also really annoyed.
“The security guards in the train station are getting threatened every week by irate drivers, its absolute bedlam.”
A coach driver, who did not want to be named, said he had been caught at the gates several times and it had made the children he was taking to school late.
He said: “Everyone is really annoyed about this, it’s causing such long queues in the morning.
“I was told Network Rail had a meeting about this with staff before Christmas, and things did improve, but obviously there was less traffic over Christmas, but now it’s gone back to the way it was before.
”The other day I queued for about half-an-hour then the barriers came up, let some of the traffic through, and they were back down again for another train before I could get there.”
A spokesman for Network Rail said it would look into residents’ complaints.
She said: “We are aware of the need to keep traffic flowing as much as possible and every level crossing is operated to balance this with running a safe and efficient railway.
"We leave barriers down for the minimum amount of time to achieve this and avoid unnecessary delays to motorists and pedestrians, but will look into the issues raised by residents.”
Comments(9)
Carnabackable
says...
2:52pm Thu 17 Jan 13
When will the "must get to now brigade" realise, they MUST set out on their journey earlier, to accommodate the delay, for them wishing to cross the railway.
The railway has right of way folks, road users learn to remember that simple yet golden rule....
I-say-you-say
says...
4:03pm Thu 17 Jan 13
Carnabackable wrote:Half hour wait between 2 seperate trains is beyond your "safety" reasoning.
The stay down for one simple reason.SAFETY When will the "must get to now brigade" realise, they MUST set out on their journey earlier, to accommodate the delay, for them wishing to cross the railway. The railway has right of way folks, road users learn to remember that simple yet golden rule....
It is nothing to do with the "get to now brigade" either as this happens throughout the morning whether it is earlier or later. Do you expect people to leave at 6am to arrive at work for 6.30am but don't actually start at 9am just to avoid the laziness of the rail company?
I'd like to see you have to deal with the battle of spending over half an hour trying to get out of the end of the road you live down because of this!
Unless you know, do not accuse!
Devils Advocate
says...
7:23pm Thu 17 Jan 13
I-say-you-say wrote:You actually know that it is caused by laziness?
Carnabackable wrote:Half hour wait between 2 seperate trains is beyond your "safety" reasoning.
The stay down for one simple reason.SAFETY When will the "must get to now brigade" realise, they MUST set out on their journey earlier, to accommodate the delay, for them wishing to cross the railway. The railway has right of way folks, road users learn to remember that simple yet golden rule....
It is nothing to do with the "get to now brigade" either as this happens throughout the morning whether it is earlier or later. Do you expect people to leave at 6am to arrive at work for 6.30am but don't actually start at 9am just to avoid the laziness of the rail company?
I'd like to see you have to deal with the battle of spending over half an hour trying to get out of the end of the road you live down because of this!
Unless you know, do not accuse!
You obviously wouldn't accuse unless you knew so I suppose you do, but I seem to remember something about safety being involved.
Also, the times you quote lead me to believe your journey is half an hour and your starting time is nine am. Thirty minutes travelling you say so leaving at six means you expect a two and a half hour delay?
SaveOurStanford
says...
10:51pm Thu 17 Jan 13
I-say-you-say
says...
9:52am Fri 18 Jan 13
SaveourStanford - what relevance does your comment have? I'm confused. Why are you picking on the school run parents? There has never been a problem before until this issue with the gates started.
Now come on people, what's with the over-reactions? We're not asking for the railway to stop, that is clearly a ridiculous suggestion. But what we are asking for it to work with the road users the way it did before - i.e. not leaving 20 mins between trains. This is a new problem that is easily resolved if only the rail company would pull their fingers out instead of giving the various excuses they have.
Carnabackable
says...
11:04am Fri 18 Jan 13
I-say-you-say
says...
3:12pm Fri 18 Jan 13
Carnabackable wrote:What a helpful comment! Really, what's the point in that - what are you....12 years old?
Leave it down for an hour, they'll soon get the message that the railway has right of way....
We know the railway has right of way - I certainly wouldn't like to pick a fight with a train - we are not asking them to stop, just work with the residents into getting things back to the way they were before they kept the gates down for an unreasonable amount of time.
Carnabackable
says...
3:34pm Fri 18 Jan 13
I-say-you-say wrote:The railway should dispense with this level crossing, and fence it off, after all it just causes grief, from the numpty road users, remember the railway own the land, and could easily charge a toll for vehicles, crossing the line.
Carnabackable wrote:What a helpful comment! Really, what's the point in that - what are you....12 years old?
Leave it down for an hour, they'll soon get the message that the railway has right of way....
We know the railway has right of way - I certainly wouldn't like to pick a fight with a train - we are not asking them to stop, just work with the residents into getting things back to the way they were before they kept the gates down for an unreasonable amount of time.
So shut the fook up, and realise who's got priority here.
I-say-you-say says...
1:32pm Thu 17 Jan 13
Then of course people get irate and stressed and start blocking exits or pulling out halfway across the road stopping traffic going the other way causing more irritation and more traffic. It's beyond a joke!
As for the rail service listening to the complaints, they haven't so far - I know of several people who have complained since this started and they have done nothing! So why would they start now?