ALASDAIR FRASER Scott Leitch yesterday parted ways with Ross County following the club's relegation from the first division at the weekend.
While the circumstances of the manager's departure were clouded in some doubt, with the former Motherwell captain apparently expressing a desire to stay and fight for promotion next season, the Dingwall club insisted he had agreed to resign.
Leitch was handed his first head-coaching role last summer by George Adams, the club's director of football. But despite securing County's first senior trophy, the Challenge Cup, in November, his side's league form continued on its downward spiral.
Leitch's departure leaves the troubled club seeking a seventh manager in less than two years as they face up to life in the second division next season.
With Ross County declaring promotion as their immediate aim at the start of the season, Leitch faced a huge challenge from day one while also having to oversee a mass exodus of high-earners from the club.
Confirming the manager's departure, Adams said: "I had a meeting with Scott this morning and he intimated his wish to resign his position due to private and personal reasons.
"It's something that's been on his mind for a period of time. He has a young family down the road and was finding that continually difficult.
"There's no hidden agenda here. It was Scott's decision.
I respect his decision and I thanked him for his time at the club. We wish him every success in the future. The club will now move forward to find a suitable replacement."
Adams, meanwhile, insisted he would be staying at County, despite rumours of a summer switch to Hibernian. "Unless I'm told otherwise, I'll be here at the start of next season," said the director of football.
Adams admitted relegation to the second division would have implications for the cash-strapped club, however he insisted: "Part-time status is not on the agenda.
"We've got a large group of individuals still under contract for next season, so there certainly will be no mass exodus."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article