Scotland's largest social landlord could be without a boss until the autumn, despite mounting speculation the Scottish Executive could force it to give up its housing stock.
Glasgow Housing Association has been without a chief executive since January, when Michael Lennon returned to his home in Australia.
Interviews two months ago failed to turn up a replacement, despite the post being offered to one applicant, a Toronto-based housing executive.
A new round of interviews is scheduled for the end of this month, with the organisation itself even unsure if it will yield a suitable candidate.
It is believed GHA is again looking overseas to places like Canada and Australia.
Even if it is successful this time, the applicant could have to give three months notice, leaving the post in the hands of an acting CEO until late September or early October.
But in the meantime, GHA is expected to be the latest organisation to fall under the microscope of the Nationalist administration.
Observers and local housing organisations, which are desperate to access GHA's stock as part of the promised second stage transfer (SST), believe the SNP's comments in parliament on the issue suggest a hands-on approach to solving the row that has dogged the organisation since it was founded.
Despite its pledges from 2002 to hand over control to LHOs, GHA has yet to transfer a single house, claiming its figures do not add up and that to do things piecemeal could be to the detriment of thousands of tenants. Both Nicola Sturgeon and Alex Salmond have promised to look again at the issue.
Meanwhile, the community-based organisations that already control large swathes of Glasgow's social housing have signalled an increased militancy if SST is not delivered.
A newsletter that went out to tenants signs off with a thinly-veiled message to lobby the SNP at every level to force through the handover.
It says: "In our opinion community-based organisations have been hugely successful over the past three decades. Now is the time to review our direction as a movement. It is clear that we must influence the policy agenda."
Focus
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article