Green belt land in Basildon faces fight for survival

Land at Little Chalvedon Hall

Land at Little Chalvedon Hall

First published in News by

HUNDREDS of acres of green belt land in Basildon are under threat from the Government’s decision to relax planning rules.

Basildon Council is in the process of deciding where homes can be built in the next 20 years.

Chancellor George Osborne has announced the Goverment will relax planning laws to speed up development and boost the country's economic growth.

Under the new rules green belt, can be built on if an equivalent-sized unprotected area of land is safeguarded from building.

Tories running Basildon Council will next month unveil new house building plans for the next two decades, which are expected to top the 10,000 mark.

Malcolm Buckley , councillor responsible for regeneration, hopes the changes may benefit the borough and speed up the development of sites.

He said: “I am in favour of speeding up the planning process in general and getting rid of some of the red tape.

“My biggest concern is if we are flooded with inappropriate developments in the green belt.

“It may be the case we have to allocate some green belt for development, but it will be at our choosing, not developers’.”

Mr Buckley said he did not want to see the changes as a charter for building firms that have bought green belt land.

Vulnerable green belt sites in Basildon include:

* Little Chalvedon Hall – 127 acres of farmland owned by Nottinghamshire County Council which has begun a public consultation on plans for 1,300 homes

* Land east of Pound Lane – 291 acres owned by various landowners. Developer Colon-nade floated plans for up to 2,275 homes by 2016/17

* Great Cowbridge Grange Farm, off London Road, Billericay – Developer Redrow Homes has an option on 71 acres of farmland The council says 650 homes could be built

* Outwood Common Road, Billericay – 68 acres owned by Frederick Gordon and Company Limited suitable for up to 650 homes according to Basildon Council.

* More than 290 acres of green belt owned by the Philpott family near, but not including the Barleylands Farm complex, were put forward to the council green belt review by property consultants Bidwells.

Comments (144)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:25am Wed 5 Sep 12

Nebs says...

Looks like we will see the whole of the South East covered in concrete.
Looks like we will see the whole of the South East covered in concrete. Nebs
  • Score: 4

11:31am Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

A obvious tactic.. pretend to be a champion of green belt land ( evict Dale farm) and the sheep will remember that more than the building on more clearly defined green belt land...altogether now...Baaaaaaaaaaa
A obvious tactic.. pretend to be a champion of green belt land ( evict Dale farm) and the sheep will remember that more than the building on more clearly defined green belt land...altogether now...Baaaaaaaaaaa E-Types..
  • Score: -6

11:31am Wed 5 Sep 12

Red Hand Gang says...

What is the point of 'Green Belt' then?
It doesn't mean a thing.
What is the point of 'Green Belt' then? It doesn't mean a thing. Red Hand Gang
  • Score: 6

11:44am Wed 5 Sep 12

Eric Whim says...

Red Hand Gang wrote:
What is the point of 'Green Belt' then? It doesn't mean a thing.
apart from loads of lovely profit once it's sold off to the developers by greedy councils/landowners
[quote][p][bold]Red Hand Gang[/bold] wrote: What is the point of 'Green Belt' then? It doesn't mean a thing.[/p][/quote]apart from loads of lovely profit once it's sold off to the developers by greedy councils/landowners Eric Whim
  • Score: 5

11:45am Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard!

That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.
I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard! That should tell you what the council think of green belt land. E-Types..
  • Score: -4

11:45am Wed 5 Sep 12

Dan_ says...

Red Hand Gang wrote:
What is the point of 'Green Belt' then?
It doesn't mean a thing.
Agree. What kind of idiot decides, yeah as long as there is a bit of ground somewhere else that we don't build on...?
Green belt designation is about controlling urban growth, not repeating the sprawl that we have had in other towns and cities in the past. I'm not even saying that some of the places above are unsuitable, but that particular policy (if it is being represented by the echo accurately) is absurd. talk about moving the goal posts.
[quote][p][bold]Red Hand Gang[/bold] wrote: What is the point of 'Green Belt' then? It doesn't mean a thing.[/p][/quote]Agree. What kind of idiot decides, yeah as long as there is a bit of ground somewhere else that we don't build on...? Green belt designation is about controlling urban growth, not repeating the sprawl that we have had in other towns and cities in the past. I'm not even saying that some of the places above are unsuitable, but that particular policy (if it is being represented by the echo accurately) is absurd. talk about moving the goal posts. Dan_
  • Score: 0

11:46am Wed 5 Sep 12

Eric Whim says...

Tory voters please take note - you can't blame this one on Tony Bliar and his neo conservative 'new' Liebour wallahs.

Adjust your settings for the next election now......
Tory voters please take note - you can't blame this one on Tony Bliar and his neo conservative 'new' Liebour wallahs. Adjust your settings for the next election now...... Eric Whim
  • Score: 0

11:59am Wed 5 Sep 12

Eric Whim says...

even though it has been reported in the pages of The Echo that many of the new build properties being nailed up at a furious rate all over te Bsildon conurbation are going unsold they are going to push through even more dvelopment it would appear in areas where lots of people don't want to see houses built.

Crazy isn't it?

However, as a solution they could bulldoze these areas where it's reported that no-one wants to buy houses/flats and turn them into nice green spaces instead........
even though it has been reported in the pages of The Echo that many of the new build properties being nailed up at a furious rate all over te Bsildon conurbation are going unsold they are going to push through even more dvelopment it would appear in areas where lots of people don't want to see houses built. Crazy isn't it? However, as a solution they could bulldoze these areas where it's reported that no-one wants to buy houses/flats and turn them into nice green spaces instead........ Eric Whim
  • Score: 1

12:00pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Eric Whim wrote:
Tory voters please take note - you can't blame this one on Tony Bliar and his neo conservative 'new' Liebour wallahs.

Adjust your settings for the next election now......
Yes indeed adjust your settings and DONT VOTE, it only encourages them.
[quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: Tory voters please take note - you can't blame this one on Tony Bliar and his neo conservative 'new' Liebour wallahs. Adjust your settings for the next election now......[/p][/quote]Yes indeed adjust your settings and DONT VOTE, it only encourages them. E-Types..
  • Score: -8

12:01pm Wed 5 Sep 12

mikepaterson says...

E-Types.. wrote:
I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard!

That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.
Again, you show your lack of understanding of the nature of Greenbelt. It does not equate to Green Fields.

You also seem to avoid the point that the scrap yard was privately owned and operated.
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard! That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.[/p][/quote]Again, you show your lack of understanding of the nature of Greenbelt. It does not equate to Green Fields. You also seem to avoid the point that the scrap yard was privately owned and operated. mikepaterson
  • Score: 6

1:21pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

mikepaterson wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard!

That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.
Again, you show your lack of understanding of the nature of Greenbelt. It does not equate to Green Fields.

You also seem to avoid the point that the scrap yard was privately owned and operated.
Can you explain what you mean!

I know what greenfield is and the land was green belt when the scrap yard was on it although i agree it should of be re- designated when it was used as a scrap yard, but it wasn't and that's why it was evicted! It doesn't matter whether the scarp yard was privately owned or not, it was operating on green belt land for over 20 years and was used by the council as a scrap yard and to dump toxic waste.


Or are you suggesting that DF is actually green field even now? It would seem that maybe its you who is confused on the DF matter.

But the issue is its clear green belt is up for grabs as many warned would be the case.
[quote][p][bold]mikepaterson[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard! That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.[/p][/quote]Again, you show your lack of understanding of the nature of Greenbelt. It does not equate to Green Fields. You also seem to avoid the point that the scrap yard was privately owned and operated.[/p][/quote]Can you explain what you mean! I know what greenfield is and the land was green belt when the scrap yard was on it although i agree it should of be re- designated when it was used as a scrap yard, but it wasn't and that's why it was evicted! It doesn't matter whether the scarp yard was privately owned or not, it was operating on green belt land for over 20 years and was used by the council as a scrap yard and to dump toxic waste. Or are you suggesting that DF is actually green field even now? It would seem that maybe its you who is confused on the DF matter. But the issue is its clear green belt is up for grabs as many warned would be the case. E-Types..
  • Score: -6

4:13pm Wed 5 Sep 12

EthanEdwards says...

I believe the eviction was because your constructions were not built according to building regulations (ie tarmac-ing over fire hydrants can be fatal etc) and without any planning permission /buil;ding inspectors etc

When I built maye. I obtained proper land. Obtained planning permission and had the building inspectors inspect at every stage. What part of that did you do you? When you construct your sites over a Bank Holiday weekend. eg Meriden.

Shoddily built shanties are not even permitted on properly designated building land. Then again don't let Mr Reality upset you Etypes.
I believe the eviction was because your constructions were not built according to building regulations (ie tarmac-ing over fire hydrants can be fatal etc) and without any planning permission /buil;ding inspectors etc When I built maye. I obtained proper land. Obtained planning permission and had the building inspectors inspect at every stage. What part of that did you do you? When you construct your sites over a Bank Holiday weekend. eg Meriden. Shoddily built shanties are not even permitted on properly designated building land. Then again don't let Mr Reality upset you Etypes. EthanEdwards
  • Score: 2

4:44pm Wed 5 Sep 12

leigh-my-town says...

There is plenty of brown-field sites around the southeast why are councils so eager to build on green belt without utilising brown-field first?
There is plenty of brown-field sites around the southeast why are councils so eager to build on green belt without utilising brown-field first? leigh-my-town
  • Score: 2

4:51pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!

Green belt although it had been a scrap yard until they moved onto it. Nothing to do with fire hydrants.

Much of the hard standing was put there by the council! Which they at first denied as they did it was a scrap yard.

Im afraid you are guilty of generalising with your comments on "your sites" and your example.

The people of DF were not involved in the example area/site you gave nor in other sites but in DF.

They cannot be held responsible for any other site in the same way you cannot be held responsible for any building erected by people from your community!

"Shoddy built shanties" ? And you point is?

It would seem you prejudice is outshining your capacity to reason logically


But as the article shows, the Government and Basildon council are all for building on green belt land and whats more they have more to build on than the few acres that was DF.

Of course the council could decided that any brown field that was once green belt is actually still green belt, as per DF, if it gets short of cheap land to sell off to their developer friends.

Any comment on the peper not informing the people of Basildon that the environment agency have been investigating DF for proof of toxic waste dumping by the council? You would think that was something the paper would be shouting from the roofs but seemingly not!
The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt! Green belt although it had been a scrap yard until they moved onto it. Nothing to do with fire hydrants. Much of the hard standing was put there by the council! Which they at first denied as they did it was a scrap yard. Im afraid you are guilty of generalising with your comments on "your sites" and your example. The people of DF were not involved in the example area/site you gave nor in other sites but in DF. They cannot be held responsible for any other site in the same way you cannot be held responsible for any building erected by people from your community! "Shoddy built shanties" ? And you point is? It would seem you prejudice is outshining your capacity to reason logically But as the article shows, the Government and Basildon council are all for building on green belt land and whats more they have more to build on than the few acres that was DF. Of course the council could decided that any brown field that was once green belt is actually still green belt, as per DF, if it gets short of cheap land to sell off to their developer friends. Any comment on the peper not informing the people of Basildon that the environment agency have been investigating DF for proof of toxic waste dumping by the council? You would think that was something the paper would be shouting from the roofs but seemingly not! E-Types..
  • Score: -9

4:54pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

leigh-my-town wrote:
There is plenty of brown-field sites around the southeast why are councils so eager to build on green belt without utilising brown-field first?
In a few word's.... CHEAPER for their developer friends to buy.
[quote][p][bold]leigh-my-town[/bold] wrote: There is plenty of brown-field sites around the southeast why are councils so eager to build on green belt without utilising brown-field first?[/p][/quote]In a few word's.... CHEAPER for their developer friends to buy. E-Types..
  • Score: -4

5:35pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Son of stropmag says...

@ E-Types.. who wrote:
"The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!"

No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate.

It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees.

It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession.

I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......
@ E-Types.. who wrote: "The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!" No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate. It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees. It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession. I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic...... Son of stropmag
  • Score: 8

5:39pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Son of stropmag says...

@ E-Types..:

PS.
Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.
@ E-Types..: PS. Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper. Son of stropmag
  • Score: 8

5:46pm Wed 5 Sep 12

gumbley says...

Quite clearly despite all the Tory promises locally and nationally, e.g. The current debacle over airport capacity, they are all at sea over planning policy and Green Belt. It would seem that the presumption in favour of development, whether on Green Belt or not is to be strengthened in the cause of economic growth (or is it profit for developers?)
As far as Dale Farm is concerned, this would appear to be a brownfield development in Green Belt which is not worthy of protection as such green belt. Why not allow the travellers to remain where they are and then make up for the "loss" of green belt by redesignating a different area e.g. Dry Street or Dunton?
Quite clearly despite all the Tory promises locally and nationally, e.g. The current debacle over airport capacity, they are all at sea over planning policy and Green Belt. It would seem that the presumption in favour of development, whether on Green Belt or not is to be strengthened in the cause of economic growth (or is it profit for developers?) As far as Dale Farm is concerned, this would appear to be a brownfield development in Green Belt which is not worthy of protection as such green belt. Why not allow the travellers to remain where they are and then make up for the "loss" of green belt by redesignating a different area e.g. Dry Street or Dunton? gumbley
  • Score: -3

5:48pm Wed 5 Sep 12

gumbley says...

Quite clearly despite all the Tory promises locally and nationally, e.g. The current debacle over airport capacity, they are all at sea over planning policy and Green Belt. It would seem that the presumption in favour of development, whether on Green Belt or not is to be strengthened in the cause of economic growth (or is it profit for developers?)
As far as Dale Farm is concerned, this would appear to be a brownfield development in Green Belt which is not worthy of protection as such green belt. Why not allow the travellers to remain where they are and then make up for the "loss" of green belt by redesignating a different area e.g. Dry Street or Dunton?
Quite clearly despite all the Tory promises locally and nationally, e.g. The current debacle over airport capacity, they are all at sea over planning policy and Green Belt. It would seem that the presumption in favour of development, whether on Green Belt or not is to be strengthened in the cause of economic growth (or is it profit for developers?) As far as Dale Farm is concerned, this would appear to be a brownfield development in Green Belt which is not worthy of protection as such green belt. Why not allow the travellers to remain where they are and then make up for the "loss" of green belt by redesignating a different area e.g. Dry Street or Dunton? gumbley
  • Score: -3

6:04pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types.. who wrote:
"The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!"

No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate.

It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees.

It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession.

I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......
Isn't residing on, so called, green belt land a breech of planning laws? You are trying to sound a bit more knowledgeable than you actually are on the matter.

It was the council not re-designating the land brown field when it was used commercially that caused the problem. If they had there would of been no green belt excuse to evict or to deny a permission to live there.

If you cant understand people resisting being moved off their own land then that the level of you.

I take it you dont think the council is "in bed" with developers...more evidence of your level of reasoning.

Why would it be logical to think Travellers were in bed with the legal profession because the council are rather favourable to selling off green belt to developers? More examples of how you 'think'

No mention of the environment department visits to the site and the papers silence on such a event?

But there again you dont live in the area do you.

You struggle to be anti-Traveller regardless of what the issue is...go away you are a racist bore. Or better still deal with the thread issue.
[quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types.. who wrote: "The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!" No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate. It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees. It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession. I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......[/p][/quote]Isn't residing on, so called, green belt land a breech of planning laws? You are trying to sound a bit more knowledgeable than you actually are on the matter. It was the council not re-designating the land brown field when it was used commercially that caused the problem. If they had there would of been no green belt excuse to evict or to deny a permission to live there. If you cant understand people resisting being moved off their own land then that the level of you. I take it you dont think the council is "in bed" with developers...more evidence of your level of reasoning. Why would it be logical to think Travellers were in bed with the legal profession because the council are rather favourable to selling off green belt to developers? More examples of how you 'think' No mention of the environment department visits to the site and the papers silence on such a event? But there again you dont live in the area do you. You struggle to be anti-Traveller regardless of what the issue is...go away you are a racist bore. Or better still deal with the thread issue. E-Types..
  • Score: -11

6:04pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types.. who wrote:
"The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!"

No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate.

It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees.

It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession.

I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......
Isn't residing on, so called, green belt land a breech of planning laws? You are trying to sound a bit more knowledgeable than you actually are on the matter.

It was the council not re-designating the land brown field when it was used commercially that caused the problem. If they had there would of been no green belt excuse to evict or to deny a permission to live there.

If you cant understand people resisting being moved off their own land then that the level of you.

I take it you dont think the council is "in bed" with developers...more evidence of your level of reasoning.

Why would it be logical to think Travellers were in bed with the legal profession because the council are rather favourable to selling off green belt to developers? More examples of how you 'think'

No mention of the environment department visits to the site and the papers silence on such a event?

But there again you dont live in the area do you.

You struggle to be anti-Traveller regardless of what the issue is...go away you are a racist bore. Or better still deal with the thread issue.
[quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types.. who wrote: "The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!" No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate. It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees. It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession. I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......[/p][/quote]Isn't residing on, so called, green belt land a breech of planning laws? You are trying to sound a bit more knowledgeable than you actually are on the matter. It was the council not re-designating the land brown field when it was used commercially that caused the problem. If they had there would of been no green belt excuse to evict or to deny a permission to live there. If you cant understand people resisting being moved off their own land then that the level of you. I take it you dont think the council is "in bed" with developers...more evidence of your level of reasoning. Why would it be logical to think Travellers were in bed with the legal profession because the council are rather favourable to selling off green belt to developers? More examples of how you 'think' No mention of the environment department visits to the site and the papers silence on such a event? But there again you dont live in the area do you. You struggle to be anti-Traveller regardless of what the issue is...go away you are a racist bore. Or better still deal with the thread issue. E-Types..
  • Score: -8

6:05pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types..:

PS.
Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.
Ring the police and ask them.
[quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types..: PS. Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.[/p][/quote]Ring the police and ask them. E-Types..
  • Score: -8

6:17pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Son of stropmag says...

E-Types.. wrote:
Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types.. who wrote:
"The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!"

No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate.

It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees.

It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession.

I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......
Isn't residing on, so called, green belt land a breech of planning laws? You are trying to sound a bit more knowledgeable than you actually are on the matter.

It was the council not re-designating the land brown field when it was used commercially that caused the problem. If they had there would of been no green belt excuse to evict or to deny a permission to live there.

If you cant understand people resisting being moved off their own land then that the level of you.

I take it you dont think the council is "in bed" with developers...more evidence of your level of reasoning.

Why would it be logical to think Travellers were in bed with the legal profession because the council are rather favourable to selling off green belt to developers? More examples of how you 'think'

No mention of the environment department visits to the site and the papers silence on such a event?

But there again you dont live in the area do you.

You struggle to be anti-Traveller regardless of what the issue is...go away you are a racist bore. Or better still deal with the thread issue.
Tell it to the Judges!- Oh, sorry, you already have...and lost.
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types.. who wrote: "The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!" No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate. It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees. It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession. I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......[/p][/quote]Isn't residing on, so called, green belt land a breech of planning laws? You are trying to sound a bit more knowledgeable than you actually are on the matter. It was the council not re-designating the land brown field when it was used commercially that caused the problem. If they had there would of been no green belt excuse to evict or to deny a permission to live there. If you cant understand people resisting being moved off their own land then that the level of you. I take it you dont think the council is "in bed" with developers...more evidence of your level of reasoning. Why would it be logical to think Travellers were in bed with the legal profession because the council are rather favourable to selling off green belt to developers? More examples of how you 'think' No mention of the environment department visits to the site and the papers silence on such a event? But there again you dont live in the area do you. You struggle to be anti-Traveller regardless of what the issue is...go away you are a racist bore. Or better still deal with the thread issue.[/p][/quote]Tell it to the Judges!- Oh, sorry, you already have...and lost. Son of stropmag
  • Score: 5

6:21pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Gina the weaner says...

E-Types.. wrote:
Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types..:

PS.
Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.
Ring the police and ask them.
Don't worry Son of Stropmag, if your father runs out of paper he could always douche and have E-Types come over to dry his bottom with the hot air that he is so full of.
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types..: PS. Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.[/p][/quote]Ring the police and ask them.[/p][/quote]Don't worry Son of Stropmag, if your father runs out of paper he could always douche and have E-Types come over to dry his bottom with the hot air that he is so full of. Gina the weaner
  • Score: 7

6:44pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Son of stropmag wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types.. who wrote:
"The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!"

No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate.

It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees.

It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession.

I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......
Isn't residing on, so called, green belt land a breech of planning laws? You are trying to sound a bit more knowledgeable than you actually are on the matter.

It was the council not re-designating the land brown field when it was used commercially that caused the problem. If they had there would of been no green belt excuse to evict or to deny a permission to live there.

If you cant understand people resisting being moved off their own land then that the level of you.

I take it you dont think the council is "in bed" with developers...more evidence of your level of reasoning.

Why would it be logical to think Travellers were in bed with the legal profession because the council are rather favourable to selling off green belt to developers? More examples of how you 'think'

No mention of the environment department visits to the site and the papers silence on such a event?

But there again you dont live in the area do you.

You struggle to be anti-Traveller regardless of what the issue is...go away you are a racist bore. Or better still deal with the thread issue.
Tell it to the Judges!- Oh, sorry, you already have...and lost.
Give that advice to your "father" and make sure you hide your stash in case they search.


Now anything to say about the thread issue or the lack of reporting on toxic waste testing on DF site?

Or is it going to be be just more of your anti-Traveller rhetoric.
[quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types.. who wrote: "The eviction was carried out because it was alleged that the people did not have permission to reside on land that was deemed green belt!" No, E-Types.., the eviction was carried out because the laws relating to planning permissions had been breached and those illegally on DF refused to vacate. It was the chancers who breached the regulations that cost the tax-payer in avoidable legal fees. It is all very well for you to accuse the council of being 'in bed' with developers. Perhaps the travellers at DF were 'in bed' with the legal profession. I actually doubt that very much but if one were to apply your logic......[/p][/quote]Isn't residing on, so called, green belt land a breech of planning laws? You are trying to sound a bit more knowledgeable than you actually are on the matter. It was the council not re-designating the land brown field when it was used commercially that caused the problem. If they had there would of been no green belt excuse to evict or to deny a permission to live there. If you cant understand people resisting being moved off their own land then that the level of you. I take it you dont think the council is "in bed" with developers...more evidence of your level of reasoning. Why would it be logical to think Travellers were in bed with the legal profession because the council are rather favourable to selling off green belt to developers? More examples of how you 'think' No mention of the environment department visits to the site and the papers silence on such a event? But there again you dont live in the area do you. You struggle to be anti-Traveller regardless of what the issue is...go away you are a racist bore. Or better still deal with the thread issue.[/p][/quote]Tell it to the Judges!- Oh, sorry, you already have...and lost.[/p][/quote]Give that advice to your "father" and make sure you hide your stash in case they search. Now anything to say about the thread issue or the lack of reporting on toxic waste testing on DF site? Or is it going to be be just more of your anti-Traveller rhetoric. E-Types..
  • Score: -6

6:45pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Gina the weaner wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types..:

PS.
Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.
Ring the police and ask them.
Don't worry Son of Stropmag, if your father runs out of paper he could always douche and have E-Types come over to dry his bottom with the hot air that he is so full of.
As you seem over interested in the job perhaps you can do it...
[quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types..: PS. Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.[/p][/quote]Ring the police and ask them.[/p][/quote]Don't worry Son of Stropmag, if your father runs out of paper he could always douche and have E-Types come over to dry his bottom with the hot air that he is so full of.[/p][/quote]As you seem over interested in the job perhaps you can do it... E-Types..
  • Score: -6

7:28pm Wed 5 Sep 12

jolllyboy says...

What is needed is cheap housing for the growing numbers of people who cannot afford to buy. The biggest mistake was the selling off of council houses so easily and not building any more.
However no-one wants to live in high rise flats or a concrete jungle. Most of my family have moved away from the South-east as it is changing into an unpleasant place to live. Just cannot wait to follow.
What is needed is cheap housing for the growing numbers of people who cannot afford to buy. The biggest mistake was the selling off of council houses so easily and not building any more. However no-one wants to live in high rise flats or a concrete jungle. Most of my family have moved away from the South-east as it is changing into an unpleasant place to live. Just cannot wait to follow. jolllyboy
  • Score: 3

7:41pm Wed 5 Sep 12

King 'El says...

E-Types.. wrote:
I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard!

That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.
Probably because until that evidence is found there really isn't a story to tell. Which straw will you be clutching at next ? Can't be many left !
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard! That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.[/p][/quote]Probably because until that evidence is found there really isn't a story to tell. Which straw will you be clutching at next ? Can't be many left ! King 'El
  • Score: 9

8:01pm Wed 5 Sep 12

President3 says...

Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types..:

PS.
Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.
Oh! How we laughed!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types..: PS. Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.[/p][/quote]Oh! How we laughed!!!! President3
  • Score: 4

8:20pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Son of stropmag says...

@ E-Types:

You say "You struggle to be anti-Traveller......
"

I am not anti-Traveller but I am anti-Pikey (there is a difference) and I do not struggle with that, in fact it comes naturally to me. I believe it would come naturally to anyone who has a natural dislike of mickey taking vagabonds.
@ E-Types: You say "You struggle to be anti-Traveller...... " I am not anti-Traveller but I am anti-Pikey (there is a difference) and I do not struggle with that, in fact it comes naturally to me. I believe it would come naturally to anyone who has a natural dislike of mickey taking vagabonds. Son of stropmag
  • Score: 8

8:28pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

King 'El wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard!

That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.
Probably because until that evidence is found there really isn't a story to tell. Which straw will you be clutching at next ? Can't be many left !
I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?

Yet reporting police have recovered a stolen fishing rod is?

What about the people who live around DF? Do you think they will also think the rod is more important a story than the chance their health has been compromised by Toxic dumping by the council at DF when it was a scrap yard?

You're another who obviously doesn't live in the vicinity and so can be blasé about the health issues.

BTW you mention straws, why would i be clutching at the aforementioned? To what goal?
[quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard! That should tell you what the council think of green belt land.[/p][/quote]Probably because until that evidence is found there really isn't a story to tell. Which straw will you be clutching at next ? Can't be many left ![/p][/quote]I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back? Yet reporting police have recovered a stolen fishing rod is? What about the people who live around DF? Do you think they will also think the rod is more important a story than the chance their health has been compromised by Toxic dumping by the council at DF when it was a scrap yard? You're another who obviously doesn't live in the vicinity and so can be blasé about the health issues. BTW you mention straws, why would i be clutching at the aforementioned? To what goal? E-Types..
  • Score: -5

8:30pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

President3 wrote:
Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types..:

PS.
Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.
Oh! How we laughed!!!!
Simple words amuse simple people? Anything to post on the tread issue or the non posting of testing for toxic waste on DF?
[quote][p][bold]President3[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types..: PS. Dad wants to know where his summons is as he's running short on toilet paper.[/p][/quote]Oh! How we laughed!!!![/p][/quote]Simple words amuse simple people? Anything to post on the tread issue or the non posting of testing for toxic waste on DF? E-Types..
  • Score: -7

8:42pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Son of stropmag says...

@ E-Types..:

The story of the checks for toxic waste was reported by the Echo:

http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/archive/2012/
08/16/Basildon+News+
%28basildon_news%29/
9875101.Experts_chec
k_former_Dale_Farm_t
raveller_site_for_po
llution/

There is nothing new (no findings as yet) to report so it is not news. Surely even you can work that out ...unless you know something the Echo doesn't of course.
@ E-Types..: The story of the checks for toxic waste was reported by the Echo: http://www.echo-news .co.uk/archive/2012/ 08/16/Basildon+News+ %28basildon_news%29/ 9875101.Experts_chec k_former_Dale_Farm_t raveller_site_for_po llution/ There is nothing new (no findings as yet) to report so it is not news. Surely even you can work that out ...unless you know something the Echo doesn't of course. Son of stropmag
  • Score: 6

9:07pm Wed 5 Sep 12

King 'El says...

@ E-Types who asks
"I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?".

Yes, that is precisely what I am saying.
I would also like to add that I see a distinct possibility of hydro-carbon deposits being found as a result of the large number of tyres illegally burnt there during the period the land was being occupied by travellers. Certainly the plumes of black smoke and the stench of burning rubber was clearly evident on many occasions. Indeed, such fires were so common that they came to be known locally as Pikey Barbecues. Obviously those responsible considered themselves to be above the law and had no consideration for the health of local residents or the damage caused to the environment. No surprises there !
@ E-Types who asks "I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?". Yes, that is precisely what I am saying. I would also like to add that I see a distinct possibility of hydro-carbon deposits being found as a result of the large number of tyres illegally burnt there during the period the land was being occupied by travellers. Certainly the plumes of black smoke and the stench of burning rubber was clearly evident on many occasions. Indeed, such fires were so common that they came to be known locally as Pikey Barbecues. Obviously those responsible considered themselves to be above the law and had no consideration for the health of local residents or the damage caused to the environment. No surprises there ! King 'El
  • Score: 17

9:44pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types:

You say "You struggle to be anti-Traveller......

"

I am not anti-Traveller but I am anti-Pikey (there is a difference) and I do not struggle with that, in fact it comes naturally to me. I believe it would come naturally to anyone who has a natural dislike of mickey taking vagabonds.
Your usage of an offense term has been noted and will be forwarded onto the relevant authorities.

You are nothing but a disturbed racist and your pattern of abuse on these threads have been noted by more than just me.

You never deal with any thread issue i reply to but attack me and my posts. That is a pattern also noted.


You are a vile racist law breaker (racial abuse is illegal and unlawful) and
Justice will be done as all law abiding people reading this will be happy to agree to.

Now if you have nothing to post on the tread issue or my mentioning of the lack of publicity by this paper of the tests ongoing on soil samples then do not post to me with any more of your hate abuse. (on this thread or any other) Your attacks on me are purely racial.
[quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types: You say "You struggle to be anti-Traveller...... " I am not anti-Traveller but I am anti-Pikey (there is a difference) and I do not struggle with that, in fact it comes naturally to me. I believe it would come naturally to anyone who has a natural dislike of mickey taking vagabonds.[/p][/quote]Your usage of an offense term has been noted and will be forwarded onto the relevant authorities. You are nothing but a disturbed racist and your pattern of abuse on these threads have been noted by more than just me. You never deal with any thread issue i reply to but attack me and my posts. That is a pattern also noted. You are a vile racist law breaker (racial abuse is illegal and unlawful) and Justice will be done as all law abiding people reading this will be happy to agree to. Now if you have nothing to post on the tread issue or my mentioning of the lack of publicity by this paper of the tests ongoing on soil samples then do not post to me with any more of your hate abuse. (on this thread or any other) Your attacks on me are purely racial. E-Types..
  • Score: -12

9:50pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types..:

The story of the checks for toxic waste was reported by the Echo:

http://www.echo-news

.co.uk/archive/2012/

08/16/Basildon+News+

%28basildon_news%29/

9875101.Experts_chec

k_former_Dale_Farm_t

raveller_site_for_po

llution/

There is nothing new (no findings as yet) to report so it is not news. Surely even you can work that out ...unless you know something the Echo doesn't of course.
I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing.

You will just have to wait to know what else there is i know in regards to DF.
[quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types..: The story of the checks for toxic waste was reported by the Echo: http://www.echo-news .co.uk/archive/2012/ 08/16/Basildon+News+ %28basildon_news%29/ 9875101.Experts_chec k_former_Dale_Farm_t raveller_site_for_po llution/ There is nothing new (no findings as yet) to report so it is not news. Surely even you can work that out ...unless you know something the Echo doesn't of course.[/p][/quote]I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing. You will just have to wait to know what else there is i know in regards to DF. E-Types..
  • Score: -9

10:05pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Camp Incontinent says...

E-Types.. wrote:
Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types..:

The story of the checks for toxic waste was reported by the Echo:

http://www.echo-news


.co.uk/archive/2012/


08/16/Basildon+News+


%28basildon_news%29/


9875101.Experts_chec


k_former_Dale_Farm_t


raveller_site_for_po


llution/

There is nothing new (no findings as yet) to report so it is not news. Surely even you can work that out ...unless you know something the Echo doesn't of course.
I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing.

You will just have to wait to know what else there is i know in regards to DF.
E.T., have you any idea how ridiculous you sound ? Why do you insist on embarrassing yourself ? You should team up with Rich~Carol.
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types..: The story of the checks for toxic waste was reported by the Echo: http://www.echo-news .co.uk/archive/2012/ 08/16/Basildon+News+ %28basildon_news%29/ 9875101.Experts_chec k_former_Dale_Farm_t raveller_site_for_po llution/ There is nothing new (no findings as yet) to report so it is not news. Surely even you can work that out ...unless you know something the Echo doesn't of course.[/p][/quote]I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing. You will just have to wait to know what else there is i know in regards to DF.[/p][/quote]E.T., have you any idea how ridiculous you sound ? Why do you insist on embarrassing yourself ? You should team up with Rich~Carol. Camp Incontinent
  • Score: 10

10:08pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

King 'El wrote:
@ E-Types who asks
"I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?".

Yes, that is precisely what I am saying.
I would also like to add that I see a distinct possibility of hydro-carbon deposits being found as a result of the large number of tyres illegally burnt there during the period the land was being occupied by travellers. Certainly the plumes of black smoke and the stench of burning rubber was clearly evident on many occasions. Indeed, such fires were so common that they came to be known locally as Pikey Barbecues. Obviously those responsible considered themselves to be above the law and had no consideration for the health of local residents or the damage caused to the environment. No surprises there !
Well it would seem you are wrong as the Echo did do a piece on the matter so what worth your opinion now? LOL.

Have you any proof such activity took place on the land in question while Travellers were there?

Would this illegal burning be undertaken right outside peoples homes with all the smoke you mention choking people in their homes

Or would it be undertaken on the roads that allowed cars to get from A to B thereby damaging them? Roads they had to pay to have maintained?

Which part of DF do you refer to incidentally?

You know nothing about Travellers and every post makes that even more abundantly clear..you are taking out of ignorance and prejudice which makes you an @rse in any right minded persons books.

Do all people who commit crime think themselves above the law?

The term you use i find racially offensive please desist from using it. You are aware that people have been convicted of using the term in the past.

The fact you use it to describe something you say is a term used locally (a term i have never heard before and im sure neither have others) does not make it legal or lawful.
[quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types who asks "I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?". Yes, that is precisely what I am saying. I would also like to add that I see a distinct possibility of hydro-carbon deposits being found as a result of the large number of tyres illegally burnt there during the period the land was being occupied by travellers. Certainly the plumes of black smoke and the stench of burning rubber was clearly evident on many occasions. Indeed, such fires were so common that they came to be known locally as Pikey Barbecues. Obviously those responsible considered themselves to be above the law and had no consideration for the health of local residents or the damage caused to the environment. No surprises there ![/p][/quote]Well it would seem you are wrong as the Echo did do a piece on the matter so what worth your opinion now? LOL. Have you any proof such activity took place on the land in question while Travellers were there? Would this illegal burning be undertaken right outside peoples homes with all the smoke you mention choking people in their homes Or would it be undertaken on the roads that allowed cars to get from A to B thereby damaging them? Roads they had to pay to have maintained? Which part of DF do you refer to incidentally? You know nothing about Travellers and every post makes that even more abundantly clear..you are taking out of ignorance and prejudice which makes you an @rse in any right minded persons books. Do all people who commit crime think themselves above the law? The term you use i find racially offensive please desist from using it. You are aware that people have been convicted of using the term in the past. The fact you use it to describe something you say is a term used locally (a term i have never heard before and im sure neither have others) does not make it legal or lawful. E-Types..
  • Score: -12

10:20pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Camp Incontinent wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
Son of stropmag wrote:
@ E-Types..:

The story of the checks for toxic waste was reported by the Echo:

http://www.echo-news



.co.uk/archive/2012/



08/16/Basildon+News+



%28basildon_news%29/



9875101.Experts_chec



k_former_Dale_Farm_t



raveller_site_for_po



llution/

There is nothing new (no findings as yet) to report so it is not news. Surely even you can work that out ...unless you know something the Echo doesn't of course.
I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing.

You will just have to wait to know what else there is i know in regards to DF.
E.T., have you any idea how ridiculous you sound ? Why do you insist on embarrassing yourself ? You should team up with Rich~Carol.
Have you any idea how childish and stupid you sound using that obvious tactic?

How i sound to an idiot like you is of no concern to me. Id say most people sound ridiculous to you as your brain struggles with dealing with even simple language.

Can you show where embarrassment would be noticeable? Besides your own?

I feel your silly posts using the same words and contentions time and again not only shows your limitations but actually embarrasses you. You dont have anything of consequence to say and so pad it out with you juvenile nonsense.

Any thing to post on the thread issue rather than what i have written?

Somehow i dont think so. (ever the case)
[quote][p][bold]Camp Incontinent[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Son of stropmag[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types..: The story of the checks for toxic waste was reported by the Echo: http://www.echo-news .co.uk/archive/2012/ 08/16/Basildon+News+ %28basildon_news%29/ 9875101.Experts_chec k_former_Dale_Farm_t raveller_site_for_po llution/ There is nothing new (no findings as yet) to report so it is not news. Surely even you can work that out ...unless you know something the Echo doesn't of course.[/p][/quote]I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing. You will just have to wait to know what else there is i know in regards to DF.[/p][/quote]E.T., have you any idea how ridiculous you sound ? Why do you insist on embarrassing yourself ? You should team up with Rich~Carol.[/p][/quote]Have you any idea how childish and stupid you sound using that obvious tactic? How i sound to an idiot like you is of no concern to me. Id say most people sound ridiculous to you as your brain struggles with dealing with even simple language. Can you show where embarrassment would be noticeable? Besides your own? I feel your silly posts using the same words and contentions time and again not only shows your limitations but actually embarrasses you. You dont have anything of consequence to say and so pad it out with you juvenile nonsense. Any thing to post on the thread issue rather than what i have written? Somehow i dont think so. (ever the case) E-Types..
  • Score: -8

11:01pm Wed 5 Sep 12

King 'El says...

E-Types.. wrote:
King 'El wrote:
@ E-Types who asks
"I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?".

Yes, that is precisely what I am saying.
I would also like to add that I see a distinct possibility of hydro-carbon deposits being found as a result of the large number of tyres illegally burnt there during the period the land was being occupied by travellers. Certainly the plumes of black smoke and the stench of burning rubber was clearly evident on many occasions. Indeed, such fires were so common that they came to be known locally as Pikey Barbecues. Obviously those responsible considered themselves to be above the law and had no consideration for the health of local residents or the damage caused to the environment. No surprises there !
Well it would seem you are wrong as the Echo did do a piece on the matter so what worth your opinion now? LOL.

Have you any proof such activity took place on the land in question while Travellers were there?

Would this illegal burning be undertaken right outside peoples homes with all the smoke you mention choking people in their homes

Or would it be undertaken on the roads that allowed cars to get from A to B thereby damaging them? Roads they had to pay to have maintained?

Which part of DF do you refer to incidentally?

You know nothing about Travellers and every post makes that even more abundantly clear..you are taking out of ignorance and prejudice which makes you an @rse in any right minded persons books.

Do all people who commit crime think themselves above the law?

The term you use i find racially offensive please desist from using it. You are aware that people have been convicted of using the term in the past.

The fact you use it to describe something you say is a term used locally (a term i have never heard before and im sure neither have others) does not make it legal or lawful.
I am well aware that there was an article on the matter in The Echo. I read it. That does not make the matter newsworthy nor do I consider it such.

As for the burning of tyres , I think this link will serve to answer your question.

http://www.echo-news
.co.uk/news/local_ne
ws/basildon/9426331.
Updated__Bonfire_bil
llows_over_A127/

This was not an isolated incident (though it may have been the most serious one). I have witnessed these fires myself as will others have done. They were often clearly visible from the A127.

The term Pikey's Barbecue is not one I have invented for my own amusement. It is, as I have already stated, commonly used in the area to describe the often witnessed plumes of black smoke eminating from the Dale Farm area. It may well be that you have not heard the term used but then you do appear to lead something of a sheltered existence so perhaps it is not surprising. You really ought to try to get out and mix more !.
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types who asks "I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?". Yes, that is precisely what I am saying. I would also like to add that I see a distinct possibility of hydro-carbon deposits being found as a result of the large number of tyres illegally burnt there during the period the land was being occupied by travellers. Certainly the plumes of black smoke and the stench of burning rubber was clearly evident on many occasions. Indeed, such fires were so common that they came to be known locally as Pikey Barbecues. Obviously those responsible considered themselves to be above the law and had no consideration for the health of local residents or the damage caused to the environment. No surprises there ![/p][/quote]Well it would seem you are wrong as the Echo did do a piece on the matter so what worth your opinion now? LOL. Have you any proof such activity took place on the land in question while Travellers were there? Would this illegal burning be undertaken right outside peoples homes with all the smoke you mention choking people in their homes Or would it be undertaken on the roads that allowed cars to get from A to B thereby damaging them? Roads they had to pay to have maintained? Which part of DF do you refer to incidentally? You know nothing about Travellers and every post makes that even more abundantly clear..you are taking out of ignorance and prejudice which makes you an @rse in any right minded persons books. Do all people who commit crime think themselves above the law? The term you use i find racially offensive please desist from using it. You are aware that people have been convicted of using the term in the past. The fact you use it to describe something you say is a term used locally (a term i have never heard before and im sure neither have others) does not make it legal or lawful.[/p][/quote]I am well aware that there was an article on the matter in The Echo. I read it. That does not make the matter newsworthy nor do I consider it such. As for the burning of tyres , I think this link will serve to answer your question. http://www.echo-news .co.uk/news/local_ne ws/basildon/9426331. Updated__Bonfire_bil llows_over_A127/ This was not an isolated incident (though it may have been the most serious one). I have witnessed these fires myself as will others have done. They were often clearly visible from the A127. The term Pikey's Barbecue is not one I have invented for my own amusement. It is, as I have already stated, commonly used in the area to describe the often witnessed plumes of black smoke eminating from the Dale Farm area. It may well be that you have not heard the term used but then you do appear to lead something of a sheltered existence so perhaps it is not surprising. You really ought to try to get out and mix more !. King 'El
  • Score: 13

11:12pm Wed 5 Sep 12

SpaffSpiff84 says...

toxic waste at dale farm? how ironic
toxic waste at dale farm? how ironic SpaffSpiff84
  • Score: 6

11:46pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

King 'El wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
King 'El wrote:
@ E-Types who asks
"I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?".

Yes, that is precisely what I am saying.
I would also like to add that I see a distinct possibility of hydro-carbon deposits being found as a result of the large number of tyres illegally burnt there during the period the land was being occupied by travellers. Certainly the plumes of black smoke and the stench of burning rubber was clearly evident on many occasions. Indeed, such fires were so common that they came to be known locally as Pikey Barbecues. Obviously those responsible considered themselves to be above the law and had no consideration for the health of local residents or the damage caused to the environment. No surprises there !
Well it would seem you are wrong as the Echo did do a piece on the matter so what worth your opinion now? LOL.

Have you any proof such activity took place on the land in question while Travellers were there?

Would this illegal burning be undertaken right outside peoples homes with all the smoke you mention choking people in their homes

Or would it be undertaken on the roads that allowed cars to get from A to B thereby damaging them? Roads they had to pay to have maintained?

Which part of DF do you refer to incidentally?

You know nothing about Travellers and every post makes that even more abundantly clear..you are taking out of ignorance and prejudice which makes you an @rse in any right minded persons books.

Do all people who commit crime think themselves above the law?

The term you use i find racially offensive please desist from using it. You are aware that people have been convicted of using the term in the past.

The fact you use it to describe something you say is a term used locally (a term i have never heard before and im sure neither have others) does not make it legal or lawful.
I am well aware that there was an article on the matter in The Echo. I read it. That does not make the matter newsworthy nor do I consider it such.

As for the burning of tyres , I think this link will serve to answer your question.

http://www.echo-news

.co.uk/news/local_ne

ws/basildon/9426331.

Updated__Bonfire_bil

llows_over_A127/

This was not an isolated incident (though it may have been the most serious one). I have witnessed these fires myself as will others have done. They were often clearly visible from the A127.

The term Pikey's Barbecue is not one I have invented for my own amusement. It is, as I have already stated, commonly used in the area to describe the often witnessed plumes of black smoke eminating from the Dale Farm area. It may well be that you have not heard the term used but then you do appear to lead something of a sheltered existence so perhaps it is not surprising. You really ought to try to get out and mix more !.
Well if you dont consider it news then thats good enough for the whole world then...without a doubt!

The story you highlight doesn't seem to say the fire was on the DF part that is in discussion here does it. In fact its seems to point to another part of the site! But of course that matters not to you does it.

Again you use the offensive term after being asked not to use it. I do not believe for one moment the term is one used regularly but one you use to try pretend its not racially offensive... but notwithstanding that let me ask you if your racist mates were to use the term n***** would you think it acceptable to use it twice on a public site as you have the racially offensive term you have?

Unless you are completely warped you must be aware that you will have to answer to this abuse on this thread and in the past, surely you are aware of that!

Can you explain how i, a Traveller, live a sheltered existence? Or is this more of your warped thinking?
I think you will find your race hate wont be welcomed in most places.

But the thread issue, hows that burn your apples that the Basildon council, who got you all rooting for them for saving a bit of land they stated was GB although it had been a scrap yard for 20 years, have now started selling of GB land and report they are going to knock out more....ever feel you have been mugged?
Well you have curtsey of Mr beach Ball
[quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types who asks "I see, so your saying the newspaper, in your opinion, doesn't think the taking of earth samples off a piece of land to see if it is contaminated by toxic waste is not newsworthy UNTILL the results come back?". Yes, that is precisely what I am saying. I would also like to add that I see a distinct possibility of hydro-carbon deposits being found as a result of the large number of tyres illegally burnt there during the period the land was being occupied by travellers. Certainly the plumes of black smoke and the stench of burning rubber was clearly evident on many occasions. Indeed, such fires were so common that they came to be known locally as Pikey Barbecues. Obviously those responsible considered themselves to be above the law and had no consideration for the health of local residents or the damage caused to the environment. No surprises there ![/p][/quote]Well it would seem you are wrong as the Echo did do a piece on the matter so what worth your opinion now? LOL. Have you any proof such activity took place on the land in question while Travellers were there? Would this illegal burning be undertaken right outside peoples homes with all the smoke you mention choking people in their homes Or would it be undertaken on the roads that allowed cars to get from A to B thereby damaging them? Roads they had to pay to have maintained? Which part of DF do you refer to incidentally? You know nothing about Travellers and every post makes that even more abundantly clear..you are taking out of ignorance and prejudice which makes you an @rse in any right minded persons books. Do all people who commit crime think themselves above the law? The term you use i find racially offensive please desist from using it. You are aware that people have been convicted of using the term in the past. The fact you use it to describe something you say is a term used locally (a term i have never heard before and im sure neither have others) does not make it legal or lawful.[/p][/quote]I am well aware that there was an article on the matter in The Echo. I read it. That does not make the matter newsworthy nor do I consider it such. As for the burning of tyres , I think this link will serve to answer your question. http://www.echo-news .co.uk/news/local_ne ws/basildon/9426331. Updated__Bonfire_bil llows_over_A127/ This was not an isolated incident (though it may have been the most serious one). I have witnessed these fires myself as will others have done. They were often clearly visible from the A127. The term Pikey's Barbecue is not one I have invented for my own amusement. It is, as I have already stated, commonly used in the area to describe the often witnessed plumes of black smoke eminating from the Dale Farm area. It may well be that you have not heard the term used but then you do appear to lead something of a sheltered existence so perhaps it is not surprising. You really ought to try to get out and mix more !.[/p][/quote]Well if you dont consider it news then thats good enough for the whole world then...without a doubt! The story you highlight doesn't seem to say the fire was on the DF part that is in discussion here does it. In fact its seems to point to another part of the site! But of course that matters not to you does it. Again you use the offensive term after being asked not to use it. I do not believe for one moment the term is one used regularly but one you use to try pretend its not racially offensive... but notwithstanding that let me ask you if your racist mates were to use the term n***** would you think it acceptable to use it twice on a public site as you have the racially offensive term you have? Unless you are completely warped you must be aware that you will have to answer to this abuse on this thread and in the past, surely you are aware of that! Can you explain how i, a Traveller, live a sheltered existence? Or is this more of your warped thinking? I think you will find your race hate wont be welcomed in most places. But the thread issue, hows that burn your apples that the Basildon council, who got you all rooting for them for saving a bit of land they stated was GB although it had been a scrap yard for 20 years, have now started selling of GB land and report they are going to knock out more....ever feel you have been mugged? Well you have curtsey of Mr beach Ball E-Types..
  • Score: -6

11:47pm Wed 5 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

SpaffSpiff84 wrote:
toxic waste at dale farm? how ironic
Indeed? In what way is it ironic?
[quote][p][bold]SpaffSpiff84[/bold] wrote: toxic waste at dale farm? how ironic[/p][/quote]Indeed? In what way is it ironic? E-Types..
  • Score: -6

10:01am Thu 6 Sep 12

angryofessex says...

Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.
Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site. angryofessex
  • Score: 7

10:35am Thu 6 Sep 12

eurodoomed says...

Green belt is green belt. This means that without very good reason, it cannot be built on. I suggest the would-be developers sell the land they have bought, or face massive losses. We will not accept development when the infrastructure simply does not support the current population, and there is no demand for more homes in our area.
Green belt is green belt. This means that without very good reason, it cannot be built on. I suggest the would-be developers sell the land they have bought, or face massive losses. We will not accept development when the infrastructure simply does not support the current population, and there is no demand for more homes in our area. eurodoomed
  • Score: 3

12:55pm Thu 6 Sep 12

Karl S Zimmerman says...

angryofessex wrote:
Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.
I can rather see why this poster irks you, angryofessex but I actually find some of his posts quite amusing. He is clearly an idiot but some idiots can be quite funny when they're trying to be something they are not. Try to drink up the humour, albeit unintentioned, and have a good laugh. I tend to post rarely but monitor regularly and I find E-types.. is a constant source of entertainment.
[quote][p][bold]angryofessex[/bold] wrote: Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.[/p][/quote]I can rather see why this poster irks you, angryofessex but I actually find some of his posts quite amusing. He is clearly an idiot but some idiots can be quite funny when they're trying to be something they are not. Try to drink up the humour, albeit unintentioned, and have a good laugh. I tend to post rarely but monitor regularly and I find E-types.. is a constant source of entertainment. Karl S Zimmerman
  • Score: 5

3:32pm Thu 6 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

No point trying to argue logically with ET, he has his own personal logic which only he understands, and as usual anyone who diagrees with him is slagged off as racist which is plain daft as the Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since. Bad decision as restricting their gene pool has led to a higher rate of congenital birth defects than any other group in Ireland and ET is the living proof of that.
No point trying to argue logically with ET, he has his own personal logic which only he understands, and as usual anyone who diagrees with him is slagged off as racist which is plain daft as the Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since. Bad decision as restricting their gene pool has led to a higher rate of congenital birth defects than any other group in Ireland and ET is the living proof of that. God Almighty
  • Score: 6

3:46pm Thu 6 Sep 12

Gina the weaner says...

@ E-Types.. who drivelled:

"I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing."

If that is true, you have obviously taken up my suggestion and enrolled in an adult literacy course. Congratulations. Good boy!
@ E-Types.. who drivelled: "I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing." If that is true, you have obviously taken up my suggestion and enrolled in an adult literacy course. Congratulations. Good boy! Gina the weaner
  • Score: 6

4:01pm Thu 6 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Nah, he's just been using a spell checker. You can't believe a word he says, he's been trying to deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists for ages despite the fact that I've sent him two links to reports in the Irish press about it! Shame there is no such thing as a logic checker for him to use but then again if there was it would reject most of his rants.
Nah, he's just been using a spell checker. You can't believe a word he says, he's been trying to deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists for ages despite the fact that I've sent him two links to reports in the Irish press about it! Shame there is no such thing as a logic checker for him to use but then again if there was it would reject most of his rants. God Almighty
  • Score: 6

4:48pm Thu 6 Sep 12

TheWizzard says...

Buckley says - “It may be the case we have to allocate some green belt for development, but it will be at our choosing, not developers’.” Anything north of the A127 will be safe then!
Buckley says - “It may be the case we have to allocate some green belt for development, but it will be at our choosing, not developers’.” Anything north of the A127 will be safe then! TheWizzard
  • Score: 0

6:19pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

angryofessex wrote:
Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.
I have made fair comment on here, if you care to read, and then replied to posts and racial abuse directed at me which do not deal with the issue at hand!

Who is to blame for the dethreading of the post, those who aim off topic posts and racial abuse at me to reply to or me for replying?

I would say your post is infantile in that it has no mature semblance of fairness about it and is of course off topic!

Why have you not remonstrated with those who have not only veered off topic but used racial terminology?

Do you even know the answer to those questions yourself?

This site is ruined by racist and people like you who give the racist succour by ignoring their illegal and unlawful actions while denigrating the victim of their criminal behaviour.
[quote][p][bold]angryofessex[/bold] wrote: Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.[/p][/quote]I have made fair comment on here, if you care to read, and then replied to posts and racial abuse directed at me which do not deal with the issue at hand! Who is to blame for the dethreading of the post, those who aim off topic posts and racial abuse at me to reply to or me for replying? I would say your post is infantile in that it has no mature semblance of fairness about it and is of course off topic! Why have you not remonstrated with those who have not only veered off topic but used racial terminology? Do you even know the answer to those questions yourself? This site is ruined by racist and people like you who give the racist succour by ignoring their illegal and unlawful actions while denigrating the victim of their criminal behaviour. E-Types..
  • Score: -7

6:22pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:
angryofessex wrote:
Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.
I can rather see why this poster irks you, angryofessex but I actually find some of his posts quite amusing. He is clearly an idiot but some idiots can be quite funny when they're trying to be something they are not. Try to drink up the humour, albeit unintentioned, and have a good laugh. I tend to post rarely but monitor regularly and I find E-types.. is a constant source of entertainment.
Your post really does show the level of your intelligence and ego!

Please show how i can be considered an idiot other than through your sickening prejudice? Can you?

It is just as well you do post rarely for you really dont have anything of merit to say to be brutally honest.
[quote][p][bold]Karl S Zimmerman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angryofessex[/bold] wrote: Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.[/p][/quote]I can rather see why this poster irks you, angryofessex but I actually find some of his posts quite amusing. He is clearly an idiot but some idiots can be quite funny when they're trying to be something they are not. Try to drink up the humour, albeit unintentioned, and have a good laugh. I tend to post rarely but monitor regularly and I find E-types.. is a constant source of entertainment.[/p][/quote]Your post really does show the level of your intelligence and ego! Please show how i can be considered an idiot other than through your sickening prejudice? Can you? It is just as well you do post rarely for you really dont have anything of merit to say to be brutally honest. E-Types..
  • Score: -7

6:46pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
No point trying to argue logically with ET, he has his own personal logic which only he understands, and as usual anyone who diagrees with him is slagged off as racist which is plain daft as the Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since. Bad decision as restricting their gene pool has led to a higher rate of congenital birth defects than any other group in Ireland and ET is the living proof of that.
Im sorry, can you elaborate on how my comments on this issue are illogical?

I do you you at least attempt to answer that straight forward request, you usually slither away flicking your forked tongue but not replying to any such request for evidence of what you lisp.

I only denounce those who make racist comments and use racist abuse as racist! surely even to a ground slider like you that makes sense.

"Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since."

Does it indeed, can you post up this report and let others see if it says as you suggest. The fact you have never been able to exceed to this request in the past would suggest you are basically a liar, not mistaken but an out and out liar.

Your racial slur on a whole community of people, which has no scientific basis in fact has been noted and you will be held accountable for your racial slur at a later date. it is all part of the pattern being allowed to establish itself.

You have also failed to understand, you are quite thick as i have proven many times before, that Travellers born in this country some for generations on generations are not Irish born Travellers or from that stock!

Do you know where your breed came from? Well research it and then when you have the knowledge suggest that you are the same as the people who came to this country whenever your lot fetched up here. Its probably a good guess Pavee were here before your breed. Not a fact? The research you background.

Im afraid it is clearly you who is from a degenerated gene pool as your previous post on this and other threads prove simply and clearly.

Who can be considered degenerate?

A person who thinks there is only one race and all else is culture

Or

A person who thinks being born in a certain country or off a certain colour or culture makes you less equal.

Im in favour of the first example.
You are of the opinion the second example is correct, as your many sluring, racial abusing psychologically flawed posts give evidence to.

The evidence is there for all those who can see through any debilitating prejudice they might have.


But back to the thread. Green belt land, i take it you have been bombarding Mr Ball with protests about Basildon council not only selling off GB but intending to make more available?

I bet you write four or five emails a day, more than you post on these threads to argue the toss about DF.

It's over DF you have a grievance against Travellers isn't it?

Not their culture or accents or their difference. Just DF or the many stereotypical myths that ground sliders like you find to explain your race hate.

Your one very sick individual.
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: No point trying to argue logically with ET, he has his own personal logic which only he understands, and as usual anyone who diagrees with him is slagged off as racist which is plain daft as the Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since. Bad decision as restricting their gene pool has led to a higher rate of congenital birth defects than any other group in Ireland and ET is the living proof of that.[/p][/quote]Im sorry, can you elaborate on how my comments on this issue are illogical? I do you you at least attempt to answer that straight forward request, you usually slither away flicking your forked tongue but not replying to any such request for evidence of what you lisp. I only denounce those who make racist comments and use racist abuse as racist! surely even to a ground slider like you that makes sense. "Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since." Does it indeed, can you post up this report and let others see if it says as you suggest. The fact you have never been able to exceed to this request in the past would suggest you are basically a liar, not mistaken but an out and out liar. Your racial slur on a whole community of people, which has no scientific basis in fact has been noted and you will be held accountable for your racial slur at a later date. it is all part of the pattern being allowed to establish itself. You have also failed to understand, you are quite thick as i have proven many times before, that Travellers born in this country some for generations on generations are not Irish born Travellers or from that stock! Do you know where your breed came from? Well research it and then when you have the knowledge suggest that you are the same as the people who came to this country whenever your lot fetched up here. Its probably a good guess Pavee were here before your breed. Not a fact? The research you background. Im afraid it is clearly you who is from a degenerated gene pool as your previous post on this and other threads prove simply and clearly. Who can be considered degenerate? A person who thinks there is only one race and all else is culture Or A person who thinks being born in a certain country or off a certain colour or culture makes you less equal. Im in favour of the first example. You are of the opinion the second example is correct, as your many sluring, racial abusing psychologically flawed posts give evidence to. The evidence is there for all those who can see through any debilitating prejudice they might have. But back to the thread. Green belt land, i take it you have been bombarding Mr Ball with protests about Basildon council not only selling off GB but intending to make more available? I bet you write four or five emails a day, more than you post on these threads to argue the toss about DF. It's over DF you have a grievance against Travellers isn't it? Not their culture or accents or their difference. Just DF or the many stereotypical myths that ground sliders like you find to explain your race hate. Your one very sick individual. E-Types..
  • Score: -9

6:54pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Gina the weaner wrote:
@ E-Types.. who drivelled:

"I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing."

If that is true, you have obviously taken up my suggestion and enrolled in an adult literacy course. Congratulations. Good boy!
Im sorry but any suggestion from you would need a health and safety clause attached, your not the brightest spark are you my dear?

Now you do realise that you are supposed to comment at least once on the issue of the thread rather than just concentrate and react to my posts?

I know im some sort of magnet for you my little dumpling, you never post else where on the site do you, but really have a bit of decorum!

People will talk, you might not be concerned but i certainly worry what my community might think of you flirting with me...Please dont get huffy you know its only makes your foot sore when you stamp it.
[quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types.. who drivelled: "I know lots the Echo dont know..how to spell is one thing." If that is true, you have obviously taken up my suggestion and enrolled in an adult literacy course. Congratulations. Good boy![/p][/quote]Im sorry but any suggestion from you would need a health and safety clause attached, your not the brightest spark are you my dear? Now you do realise that you are supposed to comment at least once on the issue of the thread rather than just concentrate and react to my posts? I know im some sort of magnet for you my little dumpling, you never post else where on the site do you, but really have a bit of decorum! People will talk, you might not be concerned but i certainly worry what my community might think of you flirting with me...Please dont get huffy you know its only makes your foot sore when you stamp it. E-Types..
  • Score: -8

7:00pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
Nah, he's just been using a spell checker. You can't believe a word he says, he's been trying to deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists for ages despite the fact that I've sent him two links to reports in the Irish press about it! Shame there is no such thing as a logic checker for him to use but then again if there was it would reject most of his rants.
" he's been trying to deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists for ages "

Thats not the truth is it? Again you are caught out telling bare faced lies. The thing is like any pathological liar you are not aware you are lying thats why i ask you to produce the report on a Thread, to date you havent been able to although you can post up link to said report! Now why is it you can post links to links to said report but not the report itself?

Could it be because you know, please be aware of the nicety of what i write next, that a report as you state it does not exist? ( im sure the meaning of what i have written in regards to nicety has again sailed high above your sloped forehead)
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: Nah, he's just been using a spell checker. You can't believe a word he says, he's been trying to deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists for ages despite the fact that I've sent him two links to reports in the Irish press about it! Shame there is no such thing as a logic checker for him to use but then again if there was it would reject most of his rants.[/p][/quote]" he's been trying to deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists for ages " Thats not the truth is it? Again you are caught out telling bare faced lies. The thing is like any pathological liar you are not aware you are lying thats why i ask you to produce the report on a Thread, to date you havent been able to although you can post up link to said report! Now why is it you can post links to links to said report but not the report itself? Could it be because you know, please be aware of the nicety of what i write next, that a report as you state it does not exist? ( im sure the meaning of what i have written in regards to nicety has again sailed high above your sloped forehead) E-Types..
  • Score: -9

7:02pm Thu 6 Sep 12

Gina the weaner says...

@ E-Types.. who wrote:

"....your not the brightest spark are you my dear?"

You must have missed a few lessons. LOL.
@ E-Types.. who wrote: "....your not the brightest spark are you my dear?" You must have missed a few lessons. LOL. Gina the weaner
  • Score: 6

7:11pm Thu 6 Sep 12

King 'El says...

Gina the weaner wrote:
@ E-Types.. who wrote:

"....your not the brightest spark are you my dear?"

You must have missed a few lessons. LOL.
Give him some credit Geaner. That post was a vast improvement on his usual iliterate ramblings. Must have taken him ages to compile ! I was tempted to say "could do better" but I'm not sure he can.
[quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types.. who wrote: "....your not the brightest spark are you my dear?" You must have missed a few lessons. LOL.[/p][/quote]Give him some credit Geaner. That post was a vast improvement on his usual iliterate ramblings. Must have taken him ages to compile ! I was tempted to say "could do better" but I'm not sure he can. King 'El
  • Score: 7

7:29pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Gina the weaner wrote:
@ E-Types.. who wrote:

"....your not the brightest spark are you my dear?"

You must have missed a few lessons. LOL.
Still no comment on the thread issue...your obsession is becoming to obvious!

Quick write something relevant to the thread topic or your carers will shunt you off to a nunnery!
[quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types.. who wrote: "....your not the brightest spark are you my dear?" You must have missed a few lessons. LOL.[/p][/quote]Still no comment on the thread issue...your obsession is becoming to obvious! Quick write something relevant to the thread topic or your carers will shunt you off to a nunnery! E-Types..
  • Score: -7

7:48pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

King 'El wrote:
Gina the weaner wrote:
@ E-Types.. who wrote:

"....your not the brightest spark are you my dear?"

You must have missed a few lessons. LOL.
Give him some credit Geaner. That post was a vast improvement on his usual iliterate ramblings. Must have taken him ages to compile ! I was tempted to say "could do better" but I'm not sure he can.
Oh dear, the idiot who also cant comment on tread issues but comes out with his usual inane comments on what I write or how i spell it...really pathetic, would seem your education is wasted on you.

As for compiling, try looking at the time the post i replied to was posted and when i posted to it. Im not long on here and reply as soon as a see the usual dribbling post by wing-nut like you.

Basildon council making MORE green belt land available for purchase? Any comment?


Btw, its known i didn't have much in the way of formal or structured education!

That being the case dont you make yourself look stupid commenting on my lack of education?

Would you be at the same level of intelligence i am without your education. They are different things of course but they do impact on and compliment each other.

BTW I have a 130 IQ, has any of you distractors got higher?

If you who do make such ridiculous comments, knowing my lack of education, had the same level you would now be swinging your arms aimlessly working behind some burger joint thinking of the latest boy/girl band.

Many of your comments suggest that.


Now you are either on here to deal with my comments on the thread topic or you have purposely come on here to attack me...you do not know me and so it can only be concluded you carry out your attacks because of my culture and by such attacks try to disuade me from commenting on this site.
[quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: @ E-Types.. who wrote: "....your not the brightest spark are you my dear?" You must have missed a few lessons. LOL.[/p][/quote]Give him some credit Geaner. That post was a vast improvement on his usual iliterate ramblings. Must have taken him ages to compile ! I was tempted to say "could do better" but I'm not sure he can.[/p][/quote]Oh dear, the idiot who also cant comment on tread issues but comes out with his usual inane comments on what I write or how i spell it...really pathetic, would seem your education is wasted on you. As for compiling, try looking at the time the post i replied to was posted and when i posted to it. Im not long on here and reply as soon as a see the usual dribbling post by wing-nut like you. Basildon council making MORE green belt land available for purchase? Any comment? Btw, its known i didn't have much in the way of formal or structured education! That being the case dont you make yourself look stupid commenting on my lack of education? Would you be at the same level of intelligence i am without your education. They are different things of course but they do impact on and compliment each other. BTW I have a 130 IQ, has any of you distractors got higher? If you who do make such ridiculous comments, knowing my lack of education, had the same level you would now be swinging your arms aimlessly working behind some burger joint thinking of the latest boy/girl band. Many of your comments suggest that. Now you are either on here to deal with my comments on the thread topic or you have purposely come on here to attack me...you do not know me and so it can only be concluded you carry out your attacks because of my culture and by such attacks try to disuade me from commenting on this site. E-Types..
  • Score: -8

8:33pm Thu 6 Sep 12

President3 says...

angryofessex wrote:
Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.
Yup.

He can brighten any room just by leaving it.

Responsible for more hijacks than the PLO.

Time and time again he has accused anyone who opposes his views is an idiot, a racist or a facist.

Review the threads he as 'contributed' to and you will find that the overwhelming view of this forum is that he is to be humoured rather than ridiculed.

Oh! How we laughed!!!
[quote][p][bold]angryofessex[/bold] wrote: Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.[/p][/quote]Yup. He can brighten any room just by leaving it. Responsible for more hijacks than the PLO. Time and time again he has accused anyone who opposes his views is an idiot, a racist or a facist. Review the threads he as 'contributed' to and you will find that the overwhelming view of this forum is that he is to be humoured rather than ridiculed. Oh! How we laughed!!! President3
  • Score: 6

9:03pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

President3 wrote:
angryofessex wrote:
Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.
Yup.

He can brighten any room just by leaving it.

Responsible for more hijacks than the PLO.

Time and time again he has accused anyone who opposes his views is an idiot, a racist or a facist.

Review the threads he as 'contributed' to and you will find that the overwhelming view of this forum is that he is to be humoured rather than ridiculed.

Oh! How we laughed!!!
Do you ever say anything original or is that too much for your feeble brain to conjure up?

You lies are there for all to see!

I call only those who use racist abuse or racial slur a racist...those i call an idiot are those, like you, who post idiotic posts (such as your latest offering)

Im not sure i have called anyone a fascist as i feel fascism isn't based on one ideology or on racism although that could be part of.

The overwhelming view of racists, idiots, disturbed or prejudiced individuals is of no worry or concern to me, for what should i expect off a site burdened with such inadequate human beings?

You for instance, you have no beef with the issue of any thread i am on but come on only to attack my posts or try to suggest in your feeble and pathetic way that you are superior to me in all ways when in truth you are not that in anyway.

You came onto the site from another area, you dont even reside in Essex, pretending to be supporting Green Belt land and issues and yet your posts never concern themselves with that, as your lack of comment on this thread proves

You use the threads to attack my posts and myself. I believe you do this to stop me posting and giving my opinion on issues. I believe you do this because of my culture and for no other reason.

I believe in your case a pattern of that has been proven a long time back and you are bang to rights. Remember its not what i think in regards to your agenda that counts but what overs over viewing the whole matter think.

You are wrapped up and waiting to go in my opinion so keep your toilet bag ready and hopefully your racism will be reported and those sharing any confined area with you will be aware of it.

Wasn't it you a while back sprouting about how high a percentage of ethnic minorities were incarcerated?

Hopefully you will have a chance to count them personally as a convicted racist abuser.

You continuing pattern of attacking me and my posts for no seemly reason other than my culture has been noted and will be forwarded.

I see you as one of the main racial abusers on this forum and a long lasting one. I will demanding that you are made an example of in any victim statement i have the chance to provide.
[quote][p][bold]President3[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angryofessex[/bold] wrote: Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.[/p][/quote]Yup. He can brighten any room just by leaving it. Responsible for more hijacks than the PLO. Time and time again he has accused anyone who opposes his views is an idiot, a racist or a facist. Review the threads he as 'contributed' to and you will find that the overwhelming view of this forum is that he is to be humoured rather than ridiculed. Oh! How we laughed!!![/p][/quote]Do you ever say anything original or is that too much for your feeble brain to conjure up? You lies are there for all to see! I call only those who use racist abuse or racial slur a racist...those i call an idiot are those, like you, who post idiotic posts (such as your latest offering) Im not sure i have called anyone a fascist as i feel fascism isn't based on one ideology or on racism although that could be part of. The overwhelming view of racists, idiots, disturbed or prejudiced individuals is of no worry or concern to me, for what should i expect off a site burdened with such inadequate human beings? You for instance, you have no beef with the issue of any thread i am on but come on only to attack my posts or try to suggest in your feeble and pathetic way that you are superior to me in all ways when in truth you are not that in anyway. You came onto the site from another area, you dont even reside in Essex, pretending to be supporting Green Belt land and issues and yet your posts never concern themselves with that, as your lack of comment on this thread proves You use the threads to attack my posts and myself. I believe you do this to stop me posting and giving my opinion on issues. I believe you do this because of my culture and for no other reason. I believe in your case a pattern of that has been proven a long time back and you are bang to rights. Remember its not what i think in regards to your agenda that counts but what overs over viewing the whole matter think. You are wrapped up and waiting to go in my opinion so keep your toilet bag ready and hopefully your racism will be reported and those sharing any confined area with you will be aware of it. Wasn't it you a while back sprouting about how high a percentage of ethnic minorities were incarcerated? Hopefully you will have a chance to count them personally as a convicted racist abuser. You continuing pattern of attacking me and my posts for no seemly reason other than my culture has been noted and will be forwarded. I see you as one of the main racial abusers on this forum and a long lasting one. I will demanding that you are made an example of in any victim statement i have the chance to provide. E-Types..
  • Score: -8

9:10pm Thu 6 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

ET: "Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since." Does it indeed, can you post up this report and let others see if it says as you suggest. The fact you have never been able to exceed to this request in the past would suggest you are basically a liar, not mistaken but an out and out liar. Your racial slur on a whole community of people, which has no scientific basis in fact has been noted and you will be held accountable for your racial slur at a later date. it is all part of the pattern being allowed to establish itself."
.
Ha ha! You don't half talk a load of drivel ET. Let's see, I'll open another window, then I'll type "wilson cavalleri irish traveller genetic" into Google and ... hey presto ... right at the top of the search results there's an article in the irish press about the report, oh and more on it further down the page. How hard was that? You owe me an apology but I won't hold my breath because you are never wrong are you ET? LMFAO
.
http://www.irishexam
iner.com/ireland/dna
-study-travellers-a-
distinct-ethnicity-1
56324.html
.
Isn't it time you were getting back to your own planet ET?
ET: "Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since." Does it indeed, can you post up this report and let others see if it says as you suggest. The fact you have never been able to exceed to this request in the past would suggest you are basically a liar, not mistaken but an out and out liar. Your racial slur on a whole community of people, which has no scientific basis in fact has been noted and you will be held accountable for your racial slur at a later date. it is all part of the pattern being allowed to establish itself." . Ha ha! You don't half talk a load of drivel ET. Let's see, I'll open another window, then I'll type "wilson cavalleri irish traveller genetic" into Google and ... hey presto ... right at the top of the search results there's an article in the irish press about the report, oh and more on it further down the page. How hard was that? You owe me an apology but I won't hold my breath because you are never wrong are you ET? LMFAO . http://www.irishexam iner.com/ireland/dna -study-travellers-a- distinct-ethnicity-1 56324.html . Isn't it time you were getting back to your own planet ET? God Almighty
  • Score: 5

9:13pm Thu 6 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

ps I'm still waiting for the Police to knock ET! Ho ho!
.
(this is like being back in the old Junior school playground, such fun!)
ps I'm still waiting for the Police to knock ET! Ho ho! . (this is like being back in the old Junior school playground, such fun!) God Almighty
  • Score: 5

11:02pm Thu 6 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
ET: "Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since." Does it indeed, can you post up this report and let others see if it says as you suggest. The fact you have never been able to exceed to this request in the past would suggest you are basically a liar, not mistaken but an out and out liar. Your racial slur on a whole community of people, which has no scientific basis in fact has been noted and you will be held accountable for your racial slur at a later date. it is all part of the pattern being allowed to establish itself."
.
Ha ha! You don't half talk a load of drivel ET. Let's see, I'll open another window, then I'll type "wilson cavalleri irish traveller genetic" into Google and ... hey presto ... right at the top of the search results there's an article in the irish press about the report, oh and more on it further down the page. How hard was that? You owe me an apology but I won't hold my breath because you are never wrong are you ET? LMFAO
.
http://www.irishexam

iner.com/ireland/dna

-study-travellers-a-

distinct-ethnicity-1

56324.html
.
Isn't it time you were getting back to your own planet ET?
" right at the top of the search results there's an article in the irish press about the report"

An article ABOUT the report but not the report? Isn't that the case?

You state you have read the report and you state that what you quote came from the report but to date you have never produced the report, just this link about the report!

Very strange. i suggested you havent read the report, you state you have! It would be very simple to prove me wrong by simply posting the report you quote from.

But even so, the link you provide seems to give the lie to your contention Travellers are just lowly Irish people (whatever that means) It shows clearly, even in the link headline, that Pavee are a distinct ethnicity from the Irish people. ie DIFFERENT!

It must be clear to all, after all these months of you quoting this report, if you could put up such a report you would do so rather than just a link about a report about the report...The truth is you cant put up the actual report can you? Can you answer this question with a simple YES or NO.

No apology from me to you is needed how could it possibly be? ... you quote something and when asked to show the source of your quote you provide not the source but links mentioning the source but not the actual source. Do you understand that?

Pretending that you have presented proof of what you have quoted for months, for the sole reason to slur a whole community, is fooling no-one but yourself.

Provide the source of your contention or it can only be dismissed as lies with an agenda (part of the pattern)

When im wrong i will first recognise if im wrong then deal with that, there is no shame in being wrong but great shame in lying as you are surely guilty of.

As for planet, it must be clear when this matter of the report is taken into consideration, that you are rather disturbed.

On any other reasonably adjusted site, less encumbered with prejudiced posters, you would of been held to account for your obfuscation by the simple methord of being asked by people, other than I, to provide the source of your quotes. Not links to a report about the source but the actual report.

This hasn't happened here for the reason given and so you have only one opponent to your sheer thickness in understanding how you fail miserably in connection with the source of your quote.

And if, as is the case here, you didn't provide that source on another site you might be labelled a liar UNLESS you are not aware that you are lying! Or just a d***head

But Is that the problem with you? You dont know your lying?

Ask yourself that and then ask yourself to provide the source of your quote to yourself! And see what you come up with!

Perhaps you will come to realise the reason you cant post a report, as you quote it, is because no such report exists as you quote!

This probably all too high brow but im sure others understand it and know you are looking like a prize pillock although they would never concede that...( must stick together against the Traveller what! Even if our kin is acting like a rather stupid pomegranate) LOL
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: ET: "Wilson Cavalleri report proves that Irish travellers are not a different race at all, they are just Irish people who were dispossesed a thousand years ago and have kept themselves to themselves ever since." Does it indeed, can you post up this report and let others see if it says as you suggest. The fact you have never been able to exceed to this request in the past would suggest you are basically a liar, not mistaken but an out and out liar. Your racial slur on a whole community of people, which has no scientific basis in fact has been noted and you will be held accountable for your racial slur at a later date. it is all part of the pattern being allowed to establish itself." . Ha ha! You don't half talk a load of drivel ET. Let's see, I'll open another window, then I'll type "wilson cavalleri irish traveller genetic" into Google and ... hey presto ... right at the top of the search results there's an article in the irish press about the report, oh and more on it further down the page. How hard was that? You owe me an apology but I won't hold my breath because you are never wrong are you ET? LMFAO . http://www.irishexam iner.com/ireland/dna -study-travellers-a- distinct-ethnicity-1 56324.html . Isn't it time you were getting back to your own planet ET?[/p][/quote]" right at the top of the search results there's an article in the irish press about the report" An article ABOUT the report but not the report? Isn't that the case? You state you have read the report and you state that what you quote came from the report but to date you have never produced the report, just this link about the report! Very strange. i suggested you havent read the report, you state you have! It would be very simple to prove me wrong by simply posting the report you quote from. But even so, the link you provide seems to give the lie to your contention Travellers are just lowly Irish people (whatever that means) It shows clearly, even in the link headline, that Pavee are a distinct ethnicity from the Irish people. ie DIFFERENT! It must be clear to all, after all these months of you quoting this report, if you could put up such a report you would do so rather than just a link about a report about the report...The truth is you cant put up the actual report can you? Can you answer this question with a simple YES or NO. No apology from me to you is needed how could it possibly be? ... you quote something and when asked to show the source of your quote you provide not the source but links mentioning the source but not the actual source. Do you understand that? Pretending that you have presented proof of what you have quoted for months, for the sole reason to slur a whole community, is fooling no-one but yourself. Provide the source of your contention or it can only be dismissed as lies with an agenda (part of the pattern) When im wrong i will first recognise if im wrong then deal with that, there is no shame in being wrong but great shame in lying as you are surely guilty of. As for planet, it must be clear when this matter of the report is taken into consideration, that you are rather disturbed. On any other reasonably adjusted site, less encumbered with prejudiced posters, you would of been held to account for your obfuscation by the simple methord of being asked by people, other than I, to provide the source of your quotes. Not links to a report about the source but the actual report. This hasn't happened here for the reason given and so you have only one opponent to your sheer thickness in understanding how you fail miserably in connection with the source of your quote. And if, as is the case here, you didn't provide that source on another site you might be labelled a liar UNLESS you are not aware that you are lying! Or just a d***head But Is that the problem with you? You dont know your lying? Ask yourself that and then ask yourself to provide the source of your quote to yourself! And see what you come up with! Perhaps you will come to realise the reason you cant post a report, as you quote it, is because no such report exists as you quote! This probably all too high brow but im sure others understand it and know you are looking like a prize pillock although they would never concede that...( must stick together against the Traveller what! Even if our kin is acting like a rather stupid pomegranate) LOL E-Types..
  • Score: -6

11:21pm Thu 6 Sep 12

fearsiuil says...

Well, 'tis almost a year now since I started writing on these silly anti-traveller threads that this paper seems to encourage ( and then close), and
the encouraging thing out of the whole sad debacle
is that
what our side said and predicted has mostly come true.

Despite the few more reasonable pro-eviction supporters insisting, in post after post, that
the so-called "GREEBELT" was the over-riding concern of both council and State
we knew all along that 'twas nothing more than a ruse and soundbight to rally the more stupid
of anti-traveller types across the land
whilst attempting to show some sort of
justification for the expensive and horrendous nonsense that followed.

As we predicted, this sham excuse was to be soon forgotten once they had forced folk out of their own homes on their own land.

Second, we told all who'd listen that the council's work would be to devastate and mess up the scrapyard, and, again, this is exactly what happened.

Third, we said that we had no place to go, so, here we are on our approach road, a year after the invasion.

Fourth, we always doubted the council's intentions and wwre ahead of the game in realising that they had plans afoot to build on proper greenfield "greenbelt" ( which is a crying shame when you think of all the crap wasteland that is in and around Basildon New Town ( London slum-clearance scheme of yesteryear.)

If only folk had listened, all those millions of pounds could have been saved, instead of being ewasted on a fool-hardy project that badly back-fired on Tony and even left Len saying that things are now worse than ever!
It seems hard to believe now that gullible fools were calling for these two clowns to be knighted, just about a year ago.
Dear oh dear! Talk about the blind leading the blind.

And talking of old Len, does anybody know how come him and his dad were allowed to build on the so-called "greenbelt", while other folks weren't?

The mystery is even more intriguing when we ask why Len was alloewed to build those big gates ON the SCRAPYARD ( Traveller's property).

It really does make you wonder who's kidding whom.

And, maybe the likes of WAYNE G - "council worker"/ "benefits officer"/ "expert on travellers"/ and "special investigator",
can come up with an answer to the question I asked last year in this very paper about the ownership of all the rubble?

I think many of ye bright sparks ( with all your perfect breeding and pedigrees) didn't see the relevance of the question back in the day. Actually, the point remains as important now as it was then.

Finally, it is worth noting that the power was all re-connected by order of the court. Yet another little weakness in the tired and jaded old anti-traveller tirade that gets regurgitated over and over.

Btw, who, from Oak Lane, chats about these so -called tyre-burning barbecues using the phrase trotted out in the posts above?
Are you sure some folks ain't still fantasising about things that happened in Belfast or places like that?

Let's be honest and face the fact that the council made a right lash-up at the scrapyard.. It gets more and more obvious, by the day.
Well, 'tis almost a year now since I started writing on these silly anti-traveller threads that this paper seems to encourage ( and then close), and the encouraging thing out of the whole sad debacle is that what our side said and predicted has mostly come true. Despite the few more reasonable pro-eviction supporters insisting, in post after post, that the so-called "GREEBELT" was the over-riding concern of both council and State we knew all along that 'twas nothing more than a ruse and soundbight to rally the more stupid of anti-traveller types across the land whilst attempting to show some sort of justification for the expensive and horrendous nonsense that followed. As we predicted, this sham excuse was to be soon forgotten once they had forced folk out of their own homes on their own land. Second, we told all who'd listen that the council's work would be to devastate and mess up the scrapyard, and, again, this is exactly what happened. Third, we said that we had no place to go, so, here we are on our approach road, a year after the invasion. Fourth, we always doubted the council's intentions and wwre ahead of the game in realising that they had plans afoot to build on proper greenfield "greenbelt" ( which is a crying shame when you think of all the crap wasteland that is in and around Basildon New Town ( London slum-clearance scheme of yesteryear.) If only folk had listened, all those millions of pounds could have been saved, instead of being ewasted on a fool-hardy project that badly back-fired on Tony and even left Len saying that things are now worse than ever! It seems hard to believe now that gullible fools were calling for these two clowns to be knighted, just about a year ago. Dear oh dear! Talk about the blind leading the blind. And talking of old Len, does anybody know how come him and his dad were allowed to build on the so-called "greenbelt", while other folks weren't? The mystery is even more intriguing when we ask why Len was alloewed to build those big gates ON the SCRAPYARD ( Traveller's property). It really does make you wonder who's kidding whom. And, maybe the likes of WAYNE G - "council worker"/ "benefits officer"/ "expert on travellers"/ and "special investigator", can come up with an answer to the question I asked last year in this very paper about the ownership of all the rubble? I think many of ye bright sparks ( with all your perfect breeding and pedigrees) didn't see the relevance of the question back in the day. Actually, the point remains as important now as it was then. Finally, it is worth noting that the power was all re-connected by order of the court. Yet another little weakness in the tired and jaded old anti-traveller tirade that gets regurgitated over and over. Btw, who, from Oak Lane, chats about these so -called tyre-burning barbecues using the phrase trotted out in the posts above? Are you sure some folks ain't still fantasising about things that happened in Belfast or places like that? Let's be honest and face the fact that the council made a right lash-up at the scrapyard.. It gets more and more obvious, by the day. fearsiuil
  • Score: -8

1:46am Fri 7 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

ET you have repeatedly told us that you are more intelligent than everyone else so prove it and find the report yourself. Ethnicity is different from race, the Scottish islanders, the Cornish and some Welsh are about as different genetically from the mainstream population as you lot are from the mainstream Irish population. Are the Scottish islanders or the Cornish a different race to the rest of us? Of course not, that would be silly, so why do you persist in calling yourself a different race when you are not? Btw I'm still waiting for the Police to call.
ET you have repeatedly told us that you are more intelligent than everyone else so prove it and find the report yourself. Ethnicity is different from race, the Scottish islanders, the Cornish and some Welsh are about as different genetically from the mainstream population as you lot are from the mainstream Irish population. Are the Scottish islanders or the Cornish a different race to the rest of us? Of course not, that would be silly, so why do you persist in calling yourself a different race when you are not? Btw I'm still waiting for the Police to call. God Almighty
  • Score: 7

2:39am Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
ET you have repeatedly told us that you are more intelligent than everyone else so prove it and find the report yourself. Ethnicity is different from race, the Scottish islanders, the Cornish and some Welsh are about as different genetically from the mainstream population as you lot are from the mainstream Irish population. Are the Scottish islanders or the Cornish a different race to the rest of us? Of course not, that would be silly, so why do you persist in calling yourself a different race when you are not? Btw I'm still waiting for the Police to call.
Stating an IQ level is not stating someone is more intelligent than all others.
But of course some are more intelligent than others.
Im more intelligent than you for instance there cannot be a doubt on that! How that must smart lol.

You make quotes from a source, you are challenged to provide the source so the truth of your quotes can be ascertained..you refuse! Only one conclusion...you are lying!

Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist

There is only one race in my opinion the human race. The rest is culture!

But even while i say that an ethnic minority, which is recognised as such, can if they so wish consider themselves a race. There are definitions of race that might also consider that to be the case.

If you are concerned the police have not called to see you then i suggest you ring them and explain your concerns that they are taking their time.

They are trained to listen even to half wits and thats a category you fit into snugly

I think we can put the posting of this fabled report to bed as its clear this is something you have conjured up during a drugged induced weekend.
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: ET you have repeatedly told us that you are more intelligent than everyone else so prove it and find the report yourself. Ethnicity is different from race, the Scottish islanders, the Cornish and some Welsh are about as different genetically from the mainstream population as you lot are from the mainstream Irish population. Are the Scottish islanders or the Cornish a different race to the rest of us? Of course not, that would be silly, so why do you persist in calling yourself a different race when you are not? Btw I'm still waiting for the Police to call.[/p][/quote]Stating an IQ level is not stating someone is more intelligent than all others. But of course some are more intelligent than others. Im more intelligent than you for instance there cannot be a doubt on that! How that must smart lol. You make quotes from a source, you are challenged to provide the source so the truth of your quotes can be ascertained..you refuse! Only one conclusion...you are lying! Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist There is only one race in my opinion the human race. The rest is culture! But even while i say that an ethnic minority, which is recognised as such, can if they so wish consider themselves a race. There are definitions of race that might also consider that to be the case. If you are concerned the police have not called to see you then i suggest you ring them and explain your concerns that they are taking their time. They are trained to listen even to half wits and thats a category you fit into snugly I think we can put the posting of this fabled report to bed as its clear this is something you have conjured up during a drugged induced weekend. E-Types..
  • Score: -7

8:45am Fri 7 Sep 12

Eric Whim says...

BTW I have a 130 IQ,


is that all?
[quote]BTW I have a 130 IQ, [/quote] is that all? Eric Whim
  • Score: 6

10:02am Fri 7 Sep 12

Gina the weaner says...

Eric Whim wrote:
BTW I have a 130 IQ,


is that all?
It is my experience that people who find it necessary to tell others of their IQ are normally socially inadequate. I doubt ET will be an exception.
[quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: [quote]BTW I have a 130 IQ, [/quote] is that all?[/p][/quote]It is my experience that people who find it necessary to tell others of their IQ are normally socially inadequate. I doubt ET will be an exception. Gina the weaner
  • Score: 6

10:16am Fri 7 Sep 12

King 'El says...

Eric Whim wrote:
BTW I have a 130 IQ,


is that all?
I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.
[quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: [quote]BTW I have a 130 IQ, [/quote] is that all?[/p][/quote]I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots. King 'El
  • Score: 7

11:56am Fri 7 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

What's the matter ET, don't you believe your own Irish press? Are they in the habit of just making up their stories? No point referring you to the original Wilson report, you wouldn't understand it - what do you know of haplotypes and PCR technology? Funny thing is you claim to be ultra intelligent but I'm the one who belongs to one of the most respected professions and a member of a Royal Institute, which takes years of study at Uni, whilst you live in a caravan and lay tarmac for a living, you don't even understand the concept of "race" so what went wrong with your life? Just for everyone else here's the link I posted earlier...
.
http://www.irishexam
iner.com/ireland/dna
-study-travellers-a-
distinct-ethnicity-1
56324.html
.
What's the matter ET, don't you believe your own Irish press? Are they in the habit of just making up their stories? No point referring you to the original Wilson report, you wouldn't understand it - what do you know of haplotypes and PCR technology? Funny thing is you claim to be ultra intelligent but I'm the one who belongs to one of the most respected professions and a member of a Royal Institute, which takes years of study at Uni, whilst you live in a caravan and lay tarmac for a living, you don't even understand the concept of "race" so what went wrong with your life? Just for everyone else here's the link I posted earlier... . http://www.irishexam iner.com/ireland/dna -study-travellers-a- distinct-ethnicity-1 56324.html . God Almighty
  • Score: 4

12:16pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Eric Whim wrote:
BTW I have a 130 IQ,


is that all?
Yes, although i believe if you were to take a IQ standardised test every day the results could marginally fluctuate one way or the other.
[quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: [quote]BTW I have a 130 IQ, [/quote] is that all?[/p][/quote]Yes, although i believe if you were to take a IQ standardised test every day the results could marginally fluctuate one way or the other. E-Types..
  • Score: -4

12:17pm Fri 7 Sep 12

its all minchy says...

I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard!



dat aint not no toxic waste it just the crusty flakes from da gusset of minty's fishy knickers
[quote]I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard! [/quote] dat aint not no toxic waste it just the crusty flakes from da gusset of minty's fishy knickers its all minchy
  • Score: 5

12:55pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Eric Whim says...

It is my experience that people who find it necessary to tell others of their IQ are normally socially inadequate. I doubt ET will be an exception.



I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.


one would think, wouldn't one that a person who purports to have what they feel is a sufficiently high enough I.Q. to brag about it in a long ongoing and increasingly tedious public internet forum dispute/name calling exercise in order, it would appear, to 'big themselves up' and attempt to belittle their opposition would be able to use a capital letter when referring to themself as 'i' (sic) and would also know the difference between 'your' and 'you're' and also 'would of'/'shouldof' and 'would have'/should have' ?

I think that there's possibly been an omission of a decimal point somewhere along the line. It's the only rational explanation
[quote]It is my experience that people who find it necessary to tell others of their IQ are normally socially inadequate. I doubt ET will be an exception.[/quote] [quote] I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.[/quote] one would think, wouldn't one that a person who purports to have what they feel is a sufficiently high enough I.Q. to brag about it in a long ongoing and increasingly tedious public internet forum dispute/name calling exercise in order, it would appear, to 'big themselves up' and attempt to belittle their opposition would be able to use a capital letter when referring to themself as 'i' (sic) and would also know the difference between 'your' and 'you're' and also 'would of'/'shouldof' and 'would have'/should have' ? I think that there's possibly been an omission of a decimal point somewhere along the line. It's the only rational explanation Eric Whim
  • Score: 4

1:17pm Fri 7 Sep 12

squarewheels. says...

"Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist"

Well, don't let that stop you calling people racist eh!
"Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist" Well, don't let that stop you calling people racist eh! squarewheels.
  • Score: 5

1:30pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Gina the weaner wrote:
Eric Whim wrote:
BTW I have a 130 IQ,


is that all?
It is my experience that people who find it necessary to tell others of their IQ are normally socially inadequate. I doubt ET will be an exception.
I make mention of my IQ level to reinforce my contention education isn't the gateway to intelligence but, circumstances permitting, the opposite might be the case

Your constant and rather limited remarks about my educational level is one of the reasons i do make mention of it.

Imo, doesn't it clearly suggest that those who have to point out spelling and grammar mistakes to another (especially if that other freely admits to lacking a formal education) are themselves mentally inadequate in that they cant understand that people have a different level of education and discipline in communicating in the written form?

Continuing on from that, Doesn't your constant pointing out of another's lack of education, thereby announcing your own superior level, tarnish you with your own brush of inadequacy?

You call into view my lack of education in virtually every post to me and yet here you are complaining and nagging about the result of your actions? Ie my underpinning my contention that intelligence isn't defined by education.

Will you never be satisfied in your dreary little life?

Just what experience have you had where people are compelled by you to report their intelligence level?

Does this happen quite regularly with you? Doesn't that say more about you than the others who react to your?

Your posts are really petty and of no worth other than to buoy the REAL inadequate's on here who attack me for cultural reasons.

Strange how you dont consider people who attack another because of their culture inadequate? Does that reveal lot more about you?
[quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: [quote]BTW I have a 130 IQ, [/quote] is that all?[/p][/quote]It is my experience that people who find it necessary to tell others of their IQ are normally socially inadequate. I doubt ET will be an exception.[/p][/quote]I make mention of my IQ level to reinforce my contention education isn't the gateway to intelligence but, circumstances permitting, the opposite might be the case Your constant and rather limited remarks about my educational level is one of the reasons i do make mention of it. Imo, doesn't it clearly suggest that those who have to point out spelling and grammar mistakes to another (especially if that other freely admits to lacking a formal education) are themselves mentally inadequate in that they cant understand that people have a different level of education and discipline in communicating in the written form? Continuing on from that, Doesn't your constant pointing out of another's lack of education, thereby announcing your own superior level, tarnish you with your own brush of inadequacy? You call into view my lack of education in virtually every post to me and yet here you are complaining and nagging about the result of your actions? Ie my underpinning my contention that intelligence isn't defined by education. Will you never be satisfied in your dreary little life? Just what experience have you had where people are compelled by you to report their intelligence level? Does this happen quite regularly with you? Doesn't that say more about you than the others who react to your? Your posts are really petty and of no worth other than to buoy the REAL inadequate's on here who attack me for cultural reasons. Strange how you dont consider people who attack another because of their culture inadequate? Does that reveal lot more about you? E-Types..
  • Score: -7

2:18pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

King 'El wrote:
Eric Whim wrote:
BTW I have a 130 IQ,


is that all?
I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.
You cant even have you own scepticism but have to share one. Oh dear baaaaaaaa!

"Idiocy Quotient" is there such a thing? If not, yet you speak as if it does exist, wouldn't this suggest you would have a high level within it?

Any comment yet on the thread issue? Or are you on this thread to attack me because of the culture i belong to as you have done on other threads?

You lack of comment on the thread issue might suggest that is the case might it not?
[quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: [quote]BTW I have a 130 IQ, [/quote] is that all?[/p][/quote]I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.[/p][/quote]You cant even have you own scepticism but have to share one. Oh dear baaaaaaaa! "Idiocy Quotient" is there such a thing? If not, yet you speak as if it does exist, wouldn't this suggest you would have a high level within it? Any comment yet on the thread issue? Or are you on this thread to attack me because of the culture i belong to as you have done on other threads? You lack of comment on the thread issue might suggest that is the case might it not? E-Types..
  • Score: -7

2:42pm Fri 7 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

You are right ET (for once) education does not improve intelligence, it just refines it and adds to knowledge. I have known several people who didn't do well at school for one reason or another (problems at home, dyslexia etc) but who were indisputedly very intelligent people. The difference is they understood pure logic whereas you have your own form of logic which isn't the same as everyone elses and is undeniably self centred. As I have said before you remind me of those X Factor contestants who are useless at singing but think they are brilliant (and no I am not a fan or a regular watcher of X Factor, I prefer Verdi, Hendrix, Iggy etc, why would I like no hopers like your scummy Cheryl whatsername). I have seen the same phenomena in all sorts of fields and the reason is simple, those who don't know enough (like small children) think they are great because they don't know enough to know better whereas those who really do know what they are talking about are also aware that they could have done better. I am sure you can guess which camp you fall into, that's right, you're one of the ones who is thick as two short planks and don't know enough to know how wrong you are. Just because you say you are right doesn't mean you are. Just because you say you are intelligent doesn't make you so. Just because you claim to have won an argument doesn't mean you have. Loser.
You are right ET (for once) education does not improve intelligence, it just refines it and adds to knowledge. I have known several people who didn't do well at school for one reason or another (problems at home, dyslexia etc) but who were indisputedly very intelligent people. The difference is they understood pure logic whereas you have your own form of logic which isn't the same as everyone elses and is undeniably self centred. As I have said before you remind me of those X Factor contestants who are useless at singing but think they are brilliant (and no I am not a fan or a regular watcher of X Factor, I prefer Verdi, Hendrix, Iggy etc, why would I like no hopers like your scummy Cheryl whatsername). I have seen the same phenomena in all sorts of fields and the reason is simple, those who don't know enough (like small children) think they are great because they don't know enough to know better whereas those who really do know what they are talking about are also aware that they could have done better. I am sure you can guess which camp you fall into, that's right, you're one of the ones who is thick as two short planks and don't know enough to know how wrong you are. Just because you say you are right doesn't mean you are. Just because you say you are intelligent doesn't make you so. Just because you claim to have won an argument doesn't mean you have. Loser. God Almighty
  • Score: 6

2:54pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
What's the matter ET, don't you believe your own Irish press? Are they in the habit of just making up their stories? No point referring you to the original Wilson report, you wouldn't understand it - what do you know of haplotypes and PCR technology? Funny thing is you claim to be ultra intelligent but I'm the one who belongs to one of the most respected professions and a member of a Royal Institute, which takes years of study at Uni, whilst you live in a caravan and lay tarmac for a living, you don't even understand the concept of "race" so what went wrong with your life? Just for everyone else here's the link I posted earlier...
.
http://www.irishexam

iner.com/ireland/dna

-study-travellers-a-

distinct-ethnicity-1

56324.html
.
My own Irish press? How do you work out that the Irish press is mine? Is this just more of your preposterous reasoning? You are challenged aren't you?

Forget all your filibustering, you have quoted something and have been asked to post up the source THAT YOU HAVE QUOTED FROM...not articles or allusion by people to said source but the actual source itself. Let me ask do you under stand the request?

I do not claim to be "ultra intelligent" that is the perception you have, i have simply stated my IQ percentile and you have done the rest! But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal.

You belong to a respected profession? Then your racism will be a deep worry to the hierarchy of that proffssion when it is revealed..i hope you have other wage earning talents!

If you paid for your studies i'd get your money back, for going by your posts on here for many months, you would have learnt as much sitting in a pub frequented by National Front members.

If you had commented in Uni as you do on here i have no doubt you would of been kicked out after being ostracised. No one respect a racist moron.

I do not lay tarmac for a living! Isn't this comment indicative and more proof of your level of intelligence?

I do indeed understand the concept of race and you saying i dont isnt any kind of evidence i dont, much more so when taken in conjunction with your rather dim reasoning and conclusions drawn on this very thread! I am quite sure You are embarrassing your allies with your slop-browed low intelligent replies to my posts.

The article you post alludes to a investigation carried out, it does not produce the results of the investigation. You have stated for the last 5 months that you have read the results of this investogation ( report) and you quote from it which brings us back to the question and request...why havent you post up the source of your quote ( it does exist doesn't it? ) and can you post it up for ll to see.

Just what do you think your superiors and colleagues would make of your level of argument on this issue?

You constantly quote from a source, are constantly requested to provide a link to that source and instead consistently link to a article that alludes to a report but no more than that! The article you link to doesn't quote from the source and thus doesn't link to the source, but you do and, in the normal way of things, should be happy to provide a link to that source but to date you havent!

The most obvious reason you dont provide the link is you cant...the question then becomes why cant you provide a link to a source you quote from.

On any other site you would be laughed off it for the idiot you are. I hope you dont deal with the public in your 'respected profession' or their might be concerns for their well being!
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: What's the matter ET, don't you believe your own Irish press? Are they in the habit of just making up their stories? No point referring you to the original Wilson report, you wouldn't understand it - what do you know of haplotypes and PCR technology? Funny thing is you claim to be ultra intelligent but I'm the one who belongs to one of the most respected professions and a member of a Royal Institute, which takes years of study at Uni, whilst you live in a caravan and lay tarmac for a living, you don't even understand the concept of "race" so what went wrong with your life? Just for everyone else here's the link I posted earlier... . http://www.irishexam iner.com/ireland/dna -study-travellers-a- distinct-ethnicity-1 56324.html .[/p][/quote]My own Irish press? How do you work out that the Irish press is mine? Is this just more of your preposterous reasoning? You are challenged aren't you? Forget all your filibustering, you have quoted something and have been asked to post up the source THAT YOU HAVE QUOTED FROM...not articles or allusion by people to said source but the actual source itself. Let me ask do you under stand the request? I do not claim to be "ultra intelligent" that is the perception you have, i have simply stated my IQ percentile and you have done the rest! But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal. You belong to a respected profession? Then your racism will be a deep worry to the hierarchy of that proffssion when it is revealed..i hope you have other wage earning talents! If you paid for your studies i'd get your money back, for going by your posts on here for many months, you would have learnt as much sitting in a pub frequented by National Front members. If you had commented in Uni as you do on here i have no doubt you would of been kicked out after being ostracised. No one respect a racist moron. I do not lay tarmac for a living! Isn't this comment indicative and more proof of your level of intelligence? I do indeed understand the concept of race and you saying i dont isnt any kind of evidence i dont, much more so when taken in conjunction with your rather dim reasoning and conclusions drawn on this very thread! I am quite sure You are embarrassing your allies with your slop-browed low intelligent replies to my posts. The article you post alludes to a investigation carried out, it does not produce the results of the investigation. You have stated for the last 5 months that you have read the results of this investogation ( report) and you quote from it which brings us back to the question and request...why havent you post up the source of your quote ( it does exist doesn't it? ) and can you post it up for ll to see. Just what do you think your superiors and colleagues would make of your level of argument on this issue? You constantly quote from a source, are constantly requested to provide a link to that source and instead consistently link to a article that alludes to a report but no more than that! The article you link to doesn't quote from the source and thus doesn't link to the source, but you do and, in the normal way of things, should be happy to provide a link to that source but to date you havent! The most obvious reason you dont provide the link is you cant...the question then becomes why cant you provide a link to a source you quote from. On any other site you would be laughed off it for the idiot you are. I hope you dont deal with the public in your 'respected profession' or their might be concerns for their well being! E-Types..
  • Score: -6

3:01pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

squarewheels. wrote:
"Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist"

Well, don't let that stop you calling people racist eh!
If a person makes, using a term society recognises, racist remarks then what do you suggest they should be called?

Are you suggesting i should call them culturist via my belief? If not then your post is vacuous
[quote][p][bold]squarewheels.[/bold] wrote: "Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist" Well, don't let that stop you calling people racist eh![/p][/quote]If a person makes, using a term society recognises, racist remarks then what do you suggest they should be called? Are you suggesting i should call them culturist via my belief? If not then your post is vacuous E-Types..
  • Score: -6

3:03pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

its all minchy wrote:
I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard!



dat aint not no toxic waste it just the crusty flakes from da gusset of minty's fishy knickers
Dimwit! But saying that your in good company with some of your community on here.
[quote][p][bold]its all minchy[/bold] wrote: [quote]I wonder why this Paper hasn't an article on of the fact the environmental department of the government have been on Dale farm looking for evidence of Asbestos and hydro-carbons dumped there by the council when the greenbelt land was a operating scrap yard! [/quote] dat aint not no toxic waste it just the crusty flakes from da gusset of minty's fishy knickers[/p][/quote]Dimwit! But saying that your in good company with some of your community on here. E-Types..
  • Score: -6

3:23pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Gina the weaner says...

Oh ET!!

"But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal."

I think that quote speaks for itself, you are funny!!!!!
Oh ET!! "But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal." I think that quote speaks for itself, you are funny!!!!! Gina the weaner
  • Score: 6

3:32pm Fri 7 Sep 12

King 'El says...

E-Types.. wrote:
King 'El wrote:
Eric Whim wrote:
BTW I have a 130 IQ,


is that all?
I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.
You cant even have you own scepticism but have to share one. Oh dear baaaaaaaa!

"Idiocy Quotient" is there such a thing? If not, yet you speak as if it does exist, wouldn't this suggest you would have a high level within it?

Any comment yet on the thread issue? Or are you on this thread to attack me because of the culture i belong to as you have done on other threads?

You lack of comment on the thread issue might suggest that is the case might it not?
As it happens, I had a reasonably long and detailed comment regarding my views on the development of green belt drafted and just a click away from posting . It reiterated the opinions I have shared on these threads before. I did not make the decisive click as I realised that it would simply involve me in a long and drawn out debate with ET on the subject of Dale Farm yet again. Since the traveller site at DF no longer exists I do not consider it a topic worth discussing. For this reason I did not make that fateful click and I do not regret that decision.
I'm afraid there is not such a thing as an Idiocy Quota as far as I'm aware. I would have expected most people reading my comment to have seen it for what it was. In fact I'm sure that most did. Unfortunately you seem to be unable to accept criticism or being wound up even when it is put in a polite way. Your egoism lets you down time and time again so that you come across as a very unpleasant character of the type few would want anything to do with in everyday life. Whether this is as a result of your traveller background or simply a genetic defficiency is not for me to say. I dare say you have your own theory. In either case it is no wonder that you choose to display a blind loyalty towards your close knit community. Frankly, nobody else would want you.
One thing I feel I must set straight. I have never attacked you because of the culture you claim to belong to. When I attack you it is for the type of person you appear to be. That you are from the travelling community has no bearing whatsoever on my attitude towards you. If it is of any consolation, I frequently criticise others on these threads and often to the point of being rude. Rich~Carol , for instance, is a typical example. She's neither Gypsy nor traveller of any kind as far as I know. She is simply an obnoxious fool . Do you see the common denominator ?
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: [quote]BTW I have a 130 IQ, [/quote] is that all?[/p][/quote]I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.[/p][/quote]You cant even have you own scepticism but have to share one. Oh dear baaaaaaaa! "Idiocy Quotient" is there such a thing? If not, yet you speak as if it does exist, wouldn't this suggest you would have a high level within it? Any comment yet on the thread issue? Or are you on this thread to attack me because of the culture i belong to as you have done on other threads? You lack of comment on the thread issue might suggest that is the case might it not?[/p][/quote]As it happens, I had a reasonably long and detailed comment regarding my views on the development of green belt drafted and just a click away from posting . It reiterated the opinions I have shared on these threads before. I did not make the decisive click as I realised that it would simply involve me in a long and drawn out debate with ET on the subject of Dale Farm yet again. Since the traveller site at DF no longer exists I do not consider it a topic worth discussing. For this reason I did not make that fateful click and I do not regret that decision. I'm afraid there is not such a thing as an Idiocy Quota as far as I'm aware. I would have expected most people reading my comment to have seen it for what it was. In fact I'm sure that most did. Unfortunately you seem to be unable to accept criticism or being wound up even when it is put in a polite way. Your egoism lets you down time and time again so that you come across as a very unpleasant character of the type few would want anything to do with in everyday life. Whether this is as a result of your traveller background or simply a genetic defficiency is not for me to say. I dare say you have your own theory. In either case it is no wonder that you choose to display a blind loyalty towards your close knit community. Frankly, nobody else would want you. One thing I feel I must set straight. I have never attacked you because of the culture you claim to belong to. When I attack you it is for the type of person you appear to be. That you are from the travelling community has no bearing whatsoever on my attitude towards you. If it is of any consolation, I frequently criticise others on these threads and often to the point of being rude. Rich~Carol , for instance, is a typical example. She's neither Gypsy nor traveller of any kind as far as I know. She is simply an obnoxious fool . Do you see the common denominator ? King 'El
  • Score: 23

3:40pm Fri 7 Sep 12

King 'El says...

Gina the weaner wrote:
Oh ET!!

"But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal."

I think that quote speaks for itself, you are funny!!!!!
A shame George Orwell is no longer with us. I'm sure he would have put such a statement to good use in his novel Dale Farm.
[quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: Oh ET!! "But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal." I think that quote speaks for itself, you are funny!!!!![/p][/quote]A shame George Orwell is no longer with us. I'm sure he would have put such a statement to good use in his novel Dale Farm. King 'El
  • Score: 7

3:44pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Eric Whim wrote:
It is my experience that people who find it necessary to tell others of their IQ are normally socially inadequate. I doubt ET will be an exception.



I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.


one would think, wouldn't one that a person who purports to have what they feel is a sufficiently high enough I.Q. to brag about it in a long ongoing and increasingly tedious public internet forum dispute/name calling exercise in order, it would appear, to 'big themselves up' and attempt to belittle their opposition would be able to use a capital letter when referring to themself as 'i' (sic) and would also know the difference between 'your' and 'you're' and also 'would of'/'shouldof' and 'would have'/should have' ?

I think that there's possibly been an omission of a decimal point somewhere along the line. It's the only rational explanation
Your post started

"one would think, wouldn't one"

and continued

"would be able to use a capital letter when referring to themself as 'i'"

Can I perhaps suggest that while you call to task my lack of education in the rules of grammer, that you might use a capital to start a sentence?

Are you not, by pointing out my lack of grammar, 'bigging yourself up to try belittle me? The very thing you accuse me of?
Isn't that a tad hypocritical? Are you a hypocrite?

You have also been guilty of bad grammar, my excuse being lack of instruction in such, what is your excuse?

Does this then follow, going by your own "rational" reasoning and considering your bad grammer, that there would be a misplaced decimal point in any IQ level attributed to your good self? Or is it different when it comes to you? ( Does this loop us back to the hypocritical question?)

Just a thought... which is worse, (If thats the right word) a person using bad grammer who has never been instructed in the rules or a person who has been instructed in the rules using bad grammer?

Perhaps you might try giving a " rational explanation" to that question if you will.

I react on this site to articles in which i might have an interest in, but when doing so nearly always find myself beleaguered by those who have no interest in the actual thread, as their lack of comment on the issue at hand shows, for daring to post! Is this acceptable to you?

Why have you cited me out for censor on this thread yet ignored other's?


I do not "brag" but make the point to, as mentioned before, reinforce my contention education isn't the gateway to intelligence.

The fact i have had no real education,
but may be considered intelligent for achieving a higher than average IQ result, would seemingly be proof of my contention.

If you see providing proof to contradict another's contention as bragging then all contentions are true and valid in spite of there being contradictions in the way of proof. Proof which cannot be alluded to for fear of 'bragging'

I do believe i may of put you right on a few things, i do hope so.

I have always said i would listen to a child if the child was telling me something i didn't know or hadn't considered. Are you like minded?
[quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: [quote]It is my experience that people who find it necessary to tell others of their IQ are normally socially inadequate. I doubt ET will be an exception.[/quote] [quote] I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.[/quote] one would think, wouldn't one that a person who purports to have what they feel is a sufficiently high enough I.Q. to brag about it in a long ongoing and increasingly tedious public internet forum dispute/name calling exercise in order, it would appear, to 'big themselves up' and attempt to belittle their opposition would be able to use a capital letter when referring to themself as 'i' (sic) and would also know the difference between 'your' and 'you're' and also 'would of'/'shouldof' and 'would have'/should have' ? I think that there's possibly been an omission of a decimal point somewhere along the line. It's the only rational explanation[/p][/quote]Your post started "one would think, wouldn't one" and continued "would be able to use a capital letter when referring to themself as 'i'" Can I perhaps suggest that while you call to task my lack of education in the rules of grammer, that you might use a capital to start a sentence? Are you not, by pointing out my lack of grammar, 'bigging yourself up to try belittle me? The very thing you accuse me of? Isn't that a tad hypocritical? Are you a hypocrite? You have also been guilty of bad grammar, my excuse being lack of instruction in such, what is your excuse? Does this then follow, going by your own "rational" reasoning and considering your bad grammer, that there would be a misplaced decimal point in any IQ level attributed to your good self? Or is it different when it comes to you? ( Does this loop us back to the hypocritical question?) Just a thought... which is worse, (If thats the right word) a person using bad grammer who has never been instructed in the rules or a person who has been instructed in the rules using bad grammer? Perhaps you might try giving a " rational explanation" to that question if you will. I react on this site to articles in which i might have an interest in, but when doing so nearly always find myself beleaguered by those who have no interest in the actual thread, as their lack of comment on the issue at hand shows, for daring to post! Is this acceptable to you? Why have you cited me out for censor on this thread yet ignored other's? I do not "brag" but make the point to, as mentioned before, reinforce my contention education isn't the gateway to intelligence. The fact i have had no real education, but may be considered intelligent for achieving a higher than average IQ result, would seemingly be proof of my contention. If you see providing proof to contradict another's contention as bragging then all contentions are true and valid in spite of there being contradictions in the way of proof. Proof which cannot be alluded to for fear of 'bragging' I do believe i may of put you right on a few things, i do hope so. I have always said i would listen to a child if the child was telling me something i didn't know or hadn't considered. Are you like minded? E-Types..
  • Score: -6

4:13pm Fri 7 Sep 12

fearsiuil says...

Yet again it seems the usual suspects on here want nothing more than to engage in the personal abuse and banter about abstract concepts,
while trying to ignore the embarrassing nonsense of
how the council botched up its expensive attempt to deal with another abstract concept,
namely, the "Greenbelt".

All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made.

Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property) we get
this diversionary tactic
where beano scriptwriters queue up to
try attack E Types.

And btw, Dale farm hasn't gone away, as one mistaken poster suggested.
It is still there but in devastated form.

Meanwhile we are on the side of our own road, just yards away.

So much for progress, eh? You dudes must have some IQ if you think the mess Tony made is somehow good.
Especially, if you really do care for what you constantly harp on about as "the greenbelt".

Complete and utter comedians, imo.
Good luck to ye! You'll certainly need it.
Yet again it seems the usual suspects on here want nothing more than to engage in the personal abuse and banter about abstract concepts, while trying to ignore the embarrassing nonsense of how the council botched up its expensive attempt to deal with another abstract concept, namely, the "Greenbelt". All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made. Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property) we get this diversionary tactic where beano scriptwriters queue up to try attack E Types. And btw, Dale farm hasn't gone away, as one mistaken poster suggested. It is still there but in devastated form. Meanwhile we are on the side of our own road, just yards away. So much for progress, eh? You dudes must have some IQ if you think the mess Tony made is somehow good. Especially, if you really do care for what you constantly harp on about as "the greenbelt". Complete and utter comedians, imo. Good luck to ye! You'll certainly need it. fearsiuil
  • Score: -6

4:21pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
You are right ET (for once) education does not improve intelligence, it just refines it and adds to knowledge. I have known several people who didn't do well at school for one reason or another (problems at home, dyslexia etc) but who were indisputedly very intelligent people. The difference is they understood pure logic whereas you have your own form of logic which isn't the same as everyone elses and is undeniably self centred. As I have said before you remind me of those X Factor contestants who are useless at singing but think they are brilliant (and no I am not a fan or a regular watcher of X Factor, I prefer Verdi, Hendrix, Iggy etc, why would I like no hopers like your scummy Cheryl whatsername). I have seen the same phenomena in all sorts of fields and the reason is simple, those who don't know enough (like small children) think they are great because they don't know enough to know better whereas those who really do know what they are talking about are also aware that they could have done better. I am sure you can guess which camp you fall into, that's right, you're one of the ones who is thick as two short planks and don't know enough to know how wrong you are. Just because you say you are right doesn't mean you are. Just because you say you are intelligent doesn't make you so. Just because you claim to have won an argument doesn't mean you have. Loser.
Can you provide a example of where my logic is different from "everyone else's"
Isn't ALL peoples logic dictated to by many different factors? Isn't that logical?

How can my "logic" be any more "self-centred" than others? This is truly meaningless drivel! But although i think that i invite you to expand on your strange comment.

What I do or dont remind you of is a moot point. I will not reveal what you put me in mind of.

You have again ventured into the tactic of filibustering to cover your lack of proof to what you state.
X-factor, 'celebrities' etc and then use this tactic to suggest there is a "phenomena" where people ask for proof of source only to promote their 'greatness' That really is disturbed reasoning? Again i hope you dont work with the public. That is already being discussed!

Im many things and like anybody when it comes to things i dont know about, im thick or perhaps ignorant might be a better way to describe it.

You have simply been asked to provide the source where you gleaned your "information" from! Is that such an unreasonable request?


"Loser" Rather pathetic dont you think?
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: You are right ET (for once) education does not improve intelligence, it just refines it and adds to knowledge. I have known several people who didn't do well at school for one reason or another (problems at home, dyslexia etc) but who were indisputedly very intelligent people. The difference is they understood pure logic whereas you have your own form of logic which isn't the same as everyone elses and is undeniably self centred. As I have said before you remind me of those X Factor contestants who are useless at singing but think they are brilliant (and no I am not a fan or a regular watcher of X Factor, I prefer Verdi, Hendrix, Iggy etc, why would I like no hopers like your scummy Cheryl whatsername). I have seen the same phenomena in all sorts of fields and the reason is simple, those who don't know enough (like small children) think they are great because they don't know enough to know better whereas those who really do know what they are talking about are also aware that they could have done better. I am sure you can guess which camp you fall into, that's right, you're one of the ones who is thick as two short planks and don't know enough to know how wrong you are. Just because you say you are right doesn't mean you are. Just because you say you are intelligent doesn't make you so. Just because you claim to have won an argument doesn't mean you have. Loser.[/p][/quote]Can you provide a example of where my logic is different from "everyone else's" Isn't ALL peoples logic dictated to by many different factors? Isn't that logical? How can my "logic" be any more "self-centred" than others? This is truly meaningless drivel! But although i think that i invite you to expand on your strange comment. What I do or dont remind you of is a moot point. I will not reveal what you put me in mind of. You have again ventured into the tactic of filibustering to cover your lack of proof to what you state. X-factor, 'celebrities' etc and then use this tactic to suggest there is a "phenomena" where people ask for proof of source only to promote their 'greatness' That really is disturbed reasoning? Again i hope you dont work with the public. That is already being discussed! Im many things and like anybody when it comes to things i dont know about, im thick or perhaps ignorant might be a better way to describe it. You have simply been asked to provide the source where you gleaned your "information" from! Is that such an unreasonable request? "Loser" Rather pathetic dont you think? E-Types..
  • Score: -5

4:22pm Fri 7 Sep 12

doasilikey says...

@ fearsiuil:

I take it that when you say "All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made." you are alluding to the decision by a large number of chancers to breach planning regs. and set up an illegal traveller site on land adjacent to the legal site at DF?
@ fearsiuil: I take it that when you say "All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made." you are alluding to the decision by a large number of chancers to breach planning regs. and set up an illegal traveller site on land adjacent to the legal site at DF? doasilikey
  • Score: 9

4:24pm Fri 7 Sep 12

squarewheels. says...

E-Types.. wrote:
squarewheels. wrote: "Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist" Well, don't let that stop you calling people racist eh!
If a person makes, using a term society recognises, racist remarks then what do you suggest they should be called? Are you suggesting i should call them culturist via my belief? If not then your post is vacuous
You state in one of your many posts above that you have never said travellers were a different race. Your continual accusations of racism would indicate you believe otherwise. How can you tell us what society recognises as a racist remark when you choose to live a life of exclusion from mainstream society?

It would, no doubt, very convenient for you if travellers were a different race but the science is just not there is it. Was that why the Wilson report was commissioned? But that was almost 2 years ago, why have the finds not yet been publically released? Can we have an answer that does'nt involve unicorns please.
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]squarewheels.[/bold] wrote: "Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist" Well, don't let that stop you calling people racist eh![/p][/quote]If a person makes, using a term society recognises, racist remarks then what do you suggest they should be called? Are you suggesting i should call them culturist via my belief? If not then your post is vacuous[/p][/quote]You state in one of your many posts above that you have never said travellers were a different race. Your continual accusations of racism would indicate you believe otherwise. How can you tell us what society recognises as a racist remark when you choose to live a life of exclusion from mainstream society? It would, no doubt, very convenient for you if travellers were a different race but the science is just not there is it. Was that why the Wilson report was commissioned? But that was almost 2 years ago, why have the finds not yet been publically released? Can we have an answer that does'nt involve unicorns please. squarewheels.
  • Score: 5

4:33pm Fri 7 Sep 12

muffindamule says...

fearsiuil wrote:
Yet again it seems the usual suspects on here want nothing more than to engage in the personal abuse and banter about abstract concepts,
while trying to ignore the embarrassing nonsense of
how the council botched up its expensive attempt to deal with another abstract concept,
namely, the "Greenbelt".

All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made.

Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property) we get
this diversionary tactic
where beano scriptwriters queue up to
try attack E Types.

And btw, Dale farm hasn't gone away, as one mistaken poster suggested.
It is still there but in devastated form.

Meanwhile we are on the side of our own road, just yards away.

So much for progress, eh? You dudes must have some IQ if you think the mess Tony made is somehow good.
Especially, if you really do care for what you constantly harp on about as "the greenbelt".

Complete and utter comedians, imo.
Good luck to ye! You'll certainly need it.
Hello fearsiuil, nice to see you back.
You say " Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property)".

Now come on, you can't have it both ways. Either the land is greenbelt or it is not. The courts have accepted that it is and there is nothing notional about that. Just how this gate which you keep on about came to be erected I don't know. If it was erected without planning permision and/or without the consent of the landowner then it should simply be removed. Is it such a big deal ? I believe I have asked you before just why you attach such importance to this gate and why you consider it to be of such relevance. I don't remember reading a reply.
[quote][p][bold]fearsiuil[/bold] wrote: Yet again it seems the usual suspects on here want nothing more than to engage in the personal abuse and banter about abstract concepts, while trying to ignore the embarrassing nonsense of how the council botched up its expensive attempt to deal with another abstract concept, namely, the "Greenbelt". All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made. Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property) we get this diversionary tactic where beano scriptwriters queue up to try attack E Types. And btw, Dale farm hasn't gone away, as one mistaken poster suggested. It is still there but in devastated form. Meanwhile we are on the side of our own road, just yards away. So much for progress, eh? You dudes must have some IQ if you think the mess Tony made is somehow good. Especially, if you really do care for what you constantly harp on about as "the greenbelt". Complete and utter comedians, imo. Good luck to ye! You'll certainly need it.[/p][/quote]Hello fearsiuil, nice to see you back. You say " Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property)". Now come on, you can't have it both ways. Either the land is greenbelt or it is not. The courts have accepted that it is and there is nothing notional about that. Just how this gate which you keep on about came to be erected I don't know. If it was erected without planning permision and/or without the consent of the landowner then it should simply be removed. Is it such a big deal ? I believe I have asked you before just why you attach such importance to this gate and why you consider it to be of such relevance. I don't remember reading a reply. muffindamule
  • Score: 7

4:55pm Fri 7 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Squarewheels, you are right that the Wilson Cavalleri report (I take you have read it or the media reports on it) was actually commissioned by a high profile traveller who wanted to prove his ancestry was more exotic than it actually is. He failed miserably cos you can't dispute the science.
.
You are such a joker ET but then I suppose we should all be grateful that whilst you are wasting your time on here you are not out indulging in those favourite traveller pastimes of conning our OAPs or taking slaves. Btw I have dealt with clever people all my life and you aint it. When I was at Uni the first time MENSA were offering IQ tests at my college so I did the test out of interest (do you even know how long the test takes, go on tel me, bet you don't know) and I came out way above your claimed result (not telling how much cos you will only say it's not true). Others who did the test and came out around the 130 mark you claim to be were vastly intellectually superior to you matey so stop telling lies.
Squarewheels, you are right that the Wilson Cavalleri report (I take you have read it or the media reports on it) was actually commissioned by a high profile traveller who wanted to prove his ancestry was more exotic than it actually is. He failed miserably cos you can't dispute the science. . You are such a joker ET but then I suppose we should all be grateful that whilst you are wasting your time on here you are not out indulging in those favourite traveller pastimes of conning our OAPs or taking slaves. Btw I have dealt with clever people all my life and you aint it. When I was at Uni the first time MENSA were offering IQ tests at my college so I did the test out of interest (do you even know how long the test takes, go on tel me, bet you don't know) and I came out way above your claimed result (not telling how much cos you will only say it's not true). Others who did the test and came out around the 130 mark you claim to be were vastly intellectually superior to you matey so stop telling lies. God Almighty
  • Score: 4

5:22pm Fri 7 Sep 12

squarewheels. says...

God Almighty wrote:
Squarewheels, you are right that the Wilson Cavalleri report (I take you have read it or the media reports on it) was actually commissioned by a high profile traveller who wanted to prove his ancestry was more exotic than it actually is. He failed miserably cos you can't dispute the science. . You are such a joker ET but then I suppose we should all be grateful that whilst you are wasting your time on here you are not out indulging in those favourite traveller pastimes of conning our OAPs or taking slaves. Btw I have dealt with clever people all my life and you aint it. When I was at Uni the first time MENSA were offering IQ tests at my college so I did the test out of interest (do you even know how long the test takes, go on tel me, bet you don't know) and I came out way above your claimed result (not telling how much cos you will only say it's not true). Others who did the test and came out around the 130 mark you claim to be were vastly intellectually superior to you matey so stop telling lies.
I have read many media references but not the final Wilson report. Dr Wilson has a site with downloads of his published works but there is no sign of it. After 2 years the work must have been finished and one can only assume that he is not free to release the findings.
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: Squarewheels, you are right that the Wilson Cavalleri report (I take you have read it or the media reports on it) was actually commissioned by a high profile traveller who wanted to prove his ancestry was more exotic than it actually is. He failed miserably cos you can't dispute the science. . You are such a joker ET but then I suppose we should all be grateful that whilst you are wasting your time on here you are not out indulging in those favourite traveller pastimes of conning our OAPs or taking slaves. Btw I have dealt with clever people all my life and you aint it. When I was at Uni the first time MENSA were offering IQ tests at my college so I did the test out of interest (do you even know how long the test takes, go on tel me, bet you don't know) and I came out way above your claimed result (not telling how much cos you will only say it's not true). Others who did the test and came out around the 130 mark you claim to be were vastly intellectually superior to you matey so stop telling lies.[/p][/quote]I have read many media references but not the final Wilson report. Dr Wilson has a site with downloads of his published works but there is no sign of it. After 2 years the work must have been finished and one can only assume that he is not free to release the findings. squarewheels.
  • Score: 2

5:26pm Fri 7 Sep 12

muffindamule says...

My wife, Marey, once told me she had just missed out on joining Mensa. Eight months later our daughter was born.
My wife, Marey, once told me she had just missed out on joining Mensa. Eight months later our daughter was born. muffindamule
  • Score: 7

5:30pm Fri 7 Sep 12

doasilikey says...

muffindamule wrote:
My wife, Marey, once told me she had just missed out on joining Mensa. Eight months later our daughter was born.
I take it you kept with tradition and called her Jenny?
[quote][p][bold]muffindamule[/bold] wrote: My wife, Marey, once told me she had just missed out on joining Mensa. Eight months later our daughter was born.[/p][/quote]I take it you kept with tradition and called her Jenny? doasilikey
  • Score: 4

6:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Gina the weaner wrote:
Oh ET!!

"But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal."

I think that quote speaks for itself, you are funny!!!!!
Yes indeed the quote speaks for itself! Isn't that what its supposed to do?

Id say your post speaks for itself too, meaning it is rather silly and vacuous...bit like you really.
[quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: Oh ET!! "But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal." I think that quote speaks for itself, you are funny!!!!![/p][/quote]Yes indeed the quote speaks for itself! Isn't that what its supposed to do? Id say your post speaks for itself too, meaning it is rather silly and vacuous...bit like you really. E-Types..
  • Score: -7

7:18pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

King 'El wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
King 'El wrote:
Eric Whim wrote:
BTW I have a 130 IQ,


is that all?
I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.
You cant even have you own scepticism but have to share one. Oh dear baaaaaaaa!

"Idiocy Quotient" is there such a thing? If not, yet you speak as if it does exist, wouldn't this suggest you would have a high level within it?

Any comment yet on the thread issue? Or are you on this thread to attack me because of the culture i belong to as you have done on other threads?

You lack of comment on the thread issue might suggest that is the case might it not?
As it happens, I had a reasonably long and detailed comment regarding my views on the development of green belt drafted and just a click away from posting . It reiterated the opinions I have shared on these threads before. I did not make the decisive click as I realised that it would simply involve me in a long and drawn out debate with ET on the subject of Dale Farm yet again. Since the traveller site at DF no longer exists I do not consider it a topic worth discussing. For this reason I did not make that fateful click and I do not regret that decision.
I'm afraid there is not such a thing as an Idiocy Quota as far as I'm aware. I would have expected most people reading my comment to have seen it for what it was. In fact I'm sure that most did. Unfortunately you seem to be unable to accept criticism or being wound up even when it is put in a polite way. Your egoism lets you down time and time again so that you come across as a very unpleasant character of the type few would want anything to do with in everyday life. Whether this is as a result of your traveller background or simply a genetic defficiency is not for me to say. I dare say you have your own theory. In either case it is no wonder that you choose to display a blind loyalty towards your close knit community. Frankly, nobody else would want you.
One thing I feel I must set straight. I have never attacked you because of the culture you claim to belong to. When I attack you it is for the type of person you appear to be. That you are from the travelling community has no bearing whatsoever on my attitude towards you. If it is of any consolation, I frequently criticise others on these threads and often to the point of being rude. Rich~Carol , for instance, is a typical example. She's neither Gypsy nor traveller of any kind as far as I know. She is simply an obnoxious fool . Do you see the common denominator ?
Oh what a coincidence, I point out your total lack of interest in the subject of the thread in the 6 posts you made, and remark on your many posts attacking me for having an such an interest, and then suddenly you was just ready to press the submit button when....you decide not to. 6 posts it took you before you NEARLY commented on the thread topic!

You obviously think we are as naive as you. But lets look at the reason you give why you didn't post in regards to the topic of the thread.

You dont want to deal with the issue in case it spills over into the matter of DF...But how could this be the case unless you make mention of DF.

I use DF in the points i making to draw a comparison to the topic, if there is a point and comparison.
By my doing so thats doesn't mean you have to rehash all the objections you had to DF all over again, thus causing the 'drawn out debate' you fear. Does it? Isn't that really your call?
( Btw aren't you already having a long drawn out engagement about DF and/or Travellers?)


Yet while you say you dont want to discuss the thread topic because of this concern, you are ready and willing to spend a great deal of time on a long drawn out attack on me for being willing to address the thread topic and using compassions, i fee,l might make my points or add to the mix of the topic!

You have the choice not to discuss the thread topic, but im not to have that choice, without the risk of being verbally attacked by you for daring to engage and post on the matter.
This is quite clear not just on this thread and other threads. You and others attack me to disuade me from taking part or making comment on a public forum?

In regard to the "idiocy quotient"

You are stating that you expect me to take seriously you not being serious, when you make something up to attack me. Are you serious?

You were making no criticism by your comment on this nonexistent quotient but ridiculing me which isn't criticism but an attack. Do you know the difference?

You make mention to egotism while ignoring your own displayed in your posts.

Im quite sure on more balanced forums many people would find your 'criticism' and wind ups unpleasant and consider you totally unpleasant to, i know i do! So what worth your opinion as compared to mine?

Im also sure they would find your racial abuse more than unpleasant and wonder if you were born like that or made or a bit of both.
It has been stated that racists are psychologically flawed individuals, it hasn't yet been research to see if people defending themselves from such flawed people are themselves flawed for reacting in a defensive manner.
Im sure many would consider defence a natural response to racial abuse by flawed people.

It would seem that you see nothing wrong in your behaviour which kind of proves the flaw!

Im not sure what you mean " nobody else would want you" You would need to expand on that if you can...there will be a good chance you can't as to do so would make it clear, even to you, what a stupid comment it is!

I have posts ( many) from you which make it quite clear (see now what i meant when i posted about patterns?) that you were attacking what i posted because of who i was not because of what i was saying.

Your previous constant usage of a racially abusive term in your posts give lie to your contention "That you are from the travelling community has no bearing whatsoever on my attitude towards you"

You and other like you on these threads have tried to restrict me, with racial abuse and concentrated attack, from defending my community from you and they when you post racial abuse, slurs and lies about us. That is quite clear to even the most simple minded. You ad they want a clear field to say what you like about my community without the hindrance of being challenge on such.

As for you compassion to your posts to Rich-Carol: Do you make abusive comments on her gender, her age, her sexual preferences, her ethnicity?

I think we know the answer to that and thats why that comparison is not valid.

I get the feeling you are posting this not so much to me but for another reason. I think its beginning to sink in isn't it Mr "King"
[quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Eric Whim[/bold] wrote: [quote]BTW I have a 130 IQ, [/quote] is that all?[/p][/quote]I share your scepticism. ET is obviously referring to his Idiocy Quotient. This runs on a scale from 1 to 150. Exceptionally high ratings of 120 and above are obtainable by complete idiots.[/p][/quote]You cant even have you own scepticism but have to share one. Oh dear baaaaaaaa! "Idiocy Quotient" is there such a thing? If not, yet you speak as if it does exist, wouldn't this suggest you would have a high level within it? Any comment yet on the thread issue? Or are you on this thread to attack me because of the culture i belong to as you have done on other threads? You lack of comment on the thread issue might suggest that is the case might it not?[/p][/quote]As it happens, I had a reasonably long and detailed comment regarding my views on the development of green belt drafted and just a click away from posting . It reiterated the opinions I have shared on these threads before. I did not make the decisive click as I realised that it would simply involve me in a long and drawn out debate with ET on the subject of Dale Farm yet again. Since the traveller site at DF no longer exists I do not consider it a topic worth discussing. For this reason I did not make that fateful click and I do not regret that decision. I'm afraid there is not such a thing as an Idiocy Quota as far as I'm aware. I would have expected most people reading my comment to have seen it for what it was. In fact I'm sure that most did. Unfortunately you seem to be unable to accept criticism or being wound up even when it is put in a polite way. Your egoism lets you down time and time again so that you come across as a very unpleasant character of the type few would want anything to do with in everyday life. Whether this is as a result of your traveller background or simply a genetic defficiency is not for me to say. I dare say you have your own theory. In either case it is no wonder that you choose to display a blind loyalty towards your close knit community. Frankly, nobody else would want you. One thing I feel I must set straight. I have never attacked you because of the culture you claim to belong to. When I attack you it is for the type of person you appear to be. That you are from the travelling community has no bearing whatsoever on my attitude towards you. If it is of any consolation, I frequently criticise others on these threads and often to the point of being rude. Rich~Carol , for instance, is a typical example. She's neither Gypsy nor traveller of any kind as far as I know. She is simply an obnoxious fool . Do you see the common denominator ?[/p][/quote]Oh what a coincidence, I point out your total lack of interest in the subject of the thread in the 6 posts you made, and remark on your many posts attacking me for having an such an interest, and then suddenly you was just ready to press the submit button when....you decide not to. 6 posts it took you before you NEARLY commented on the thread topic! You obviously think we are as naive as you. But lets look at the reason you give why you didn't post in regards to the topic of the thread. You dont want to deal with the issue in case it spills over into the matter of DF...But how could this be the case unless you make mention of DF. I use DF in the points i making to draw a comparison to the topic, if there is a point and comparison. By my doing so thats doesn't mean you have to rehash all the objections you had to DF all over again, thus causing the 'drawn out debate' you fear. Does it? Isn't that really your call? ( Btw aren't you already having a long drawn out engagement about DF and/or Travellers?) Yet while you say you dont want to discuss the thread topic because of this concern, you are ready and willing to spend a great deal of time on a long drawn out attack on me for being willing to address the thread topic and using compassions, i fee,l might make my points or add to the mix of the topic! You have the choice not to discuss the thread topic, but im not to have that choice, without the risk of being verbally attacked by you for daring to engage and post on the matter. This is quite clear not just on this thread and other threads. You and others attack me to disuade me from taking part or making comment on a public forum? In regard to the "idiocy quotient" You are stating that you expect me to take seriously you not being serious, when you make something up to attack me. Are you serious? You were making no criticism by your comment on this nonexistent quotient but ridiculing me which isn't criticism but an attack. Do you know the difference? You make mention to egotism while ignoring your own displayed in your posts. Im quite sure on more balanced forums many people would find your 'criticism' and wind ups unpleasant and consider you totally unpleasant to, i know i do! So what worth your opinion as compared to mine? Im also sure they would find your racial abuse more than unpleasant and wonder if you were born like that or made or a bit of both. It has been stated that racists are psychologically flawed individuals, it hasn't yet been research to see if people defending themselves from such flawed people are themselves flawed for reacting in a defensive manner. Im sure many would consider defence a natural response to racial abuse by flawed people. It would seem that you see nothing wrong in your behaviour which kind of proves the flaw! Im not sure what you mean " nobody else would want you" You would need to expand on that if you can...there will be a good chance you can't as to do so would make it clear, even to you, what a stupid comment it is! I have posts ( many) from you which make it quite clear (see now what i meant when i posted about patterns?) that you were attacking what i posted because of who i was not because of what i was saying. Your previous constant usage of a racially abusive term in your posts give lie to your contention "That you are from the travelling community has no bearing whatsoever on my attitude towards you" You and other like you on these threads have tried to restrict me, with racial abuse and concentrated attack, from defending my community from you and they when you post racial abuse, slurs and lies about us. That is quite clear to even the most simple minded. You ad they want a clear field to say what you like about my community without the hindrance of being challenge on such. As for you compassion to your posts to Rich-Carol: Do you make abusive comments on her gender, her age, her sexual preferences, her ethnicity? I think we know the answer to that and thats why that comparison is not valid. I get the feeling you are posting this not so much to me but for another reason. I think its beginning to sink in isn't it Mr "King" E-Types..
  • Score: -8

7:24pm Fri 7 Sep 12

doasilikey says...

Hey Hey! Stanley's back!
Hey Hey! Stanley's back! doasilikey
  • Score: 5

7:35pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

King 'El wrote:
Gina the weaner wrote:
Oh ET!!

"But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal."

I think that quote speaks for itself, you are funny!!!!!
A shame George Orwell is no longer with us. I'm sure he would have put such a statement to good use in his novel Dale Farm.
Im quite sure if he had wrote such you wouldn't of understood it!
[quote][p][bold]King 'El[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Gina the weaner[/bold] wrote: Oh ET!! "But on saying that i do claim to be more intelligent than you all things being equal." I think that quote speaks for itself, you are funny!!!!![/p][/quote]A shame George Orwell is no longer with us. I'm sure he would have put such a statement to good use in his novel Dale Farm.[/p][/quote]Im quite sure if he had wrote such you wouldn't of understood it! E-Types..
  • Score: -6

7:48pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

doasilikey wrote:
@ fearsiuil:

I take it that when you say "All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made." you are alluding to the decision by a large number of chancers to breach planning regs. and set up an illegal traveller site on land adjacent to the legal site at DF?
Ah one of the vultures, your a bit late aren't you? Where have you been?

I hope you havent been standing in the high street again, glaring at people you believe to be Travellers. Its going to get you into trouble one day if not sectioned.
[quote][p][bold]doasilikey[/bold] wrote: @ fearsiuil: I take it that when you say "All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made." you are alluding to the decision by a large number of chancers to breach planning regs. and set up an illegal traveller site on land adjacent to the legal site at DF?[/p][/quote]Ah one of the vultures, your a bit late aren't you? Where have you been? I hope you havent been standing in the high street again, glaring at people you believe to be Travellers. Its going to get you into trouble one day if not sectioned. E-Types..
  • Score: -7

7:54pm Fri 7 Sep 12

doasilikey says...

E-Types.. wrote:
doasilikey wrote:
@ fearsiuil:

I take it that when you say "All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made." you are alluding to the decision by a large number of chancers to breach planning regs. and set up an illegal traveller site on land adjacent to the legal site at DF?
Ah one of the vultures, your a bit late aren't you? Where have you been?

I hope you havent been standing in the high street again, glaring at people you believe to be Travellers. Its going to get you into trouble one day if not sectioned.
No, I've been gainfully employed and providing the exchequer with some tax monies in order that the country can function. You?
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]doasilikey[/bold] wrote: @ fearsiuil: I take it that when you say "All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made." you are alluding to the decision by a large number of chancers to breach planning regs. and set up an illegal traveller site on land adjacent to the legal site at DF?[/p][/quote]Ah one of the vultures, your a bit late aren't you? Where have you been? I hope you havent been standing in the high street again, glaring at people you believe to be Travellers. Its going to get you into trouble one day if not sectioned.[/p][/quote]No, I've been gainfully employed and providing the exchequer with some tax monies in order that the country can function. You? doasilikey
  • Score: 6

8:24pm Fri 7 Sep 12

President3 says...

E-Types.. wrote:
President3 wrote:
angryofessex wrote:
Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.
Yup.

He can brighten any room just by leaving it.

Responsible for more hijacks than the PLO.

Time and time again he has accused anyone who opposes his views is an idiot, a racist or a facist.

Review the threads he as 'contributed' to and you will find that the overwhelming view of this forum is that he is to be humoured rather than ridiculed.

Oh! How we laughed!!!
Do you ever say anything original or is that too much for your feeble brain to conjure up?

You lies are there for all to see!

I call only those who use racist abuse or racial slur a racist...those i call an idiot are those, like you, who post idiotic posts (such as your latest offering)

Im not sure i have called anyone a fascist as i feel fascism isn't based on one ideology or on racism although that could be part of.

The overwhelming view of racists, idiots, disturbed or prejudiced individuals is of no worry or concern to me, for what should i expect off a site burdened with such inadequate human beings?

You for instance, you have no beef with the issue of any thread i am on but come on only to attack my posts or try to suggest in your feeble and pathetic way that you are superior to me in all ways when in truth you are not that in anyway.

You came onto the site from another area, you dont even reside in Essex, pretending to be supporting Green Belt land and issues and yet your posts never concern themselves with that, as your lack of comment on this thread proves

You use the threads to attack my posts and myself. I believe you do this to stop me posting and giving my opinion on issues. I believe you do this because of my culture and for no other reason.

I believe in your case a pattern of that has been proven a long time back and you are bang to rights. Remember its not what i think in regards to your agenda that counts but what overs over viewing the whole matter think.

You are wrapped up and waiting to go in my opinion so keep your toilet bag ready and hopefully your racism will be reported and those sharing any confined area with you will be aware of it.

Wasn't it you a while back sprouting about how high a percentage of ethnic minorities were incarcerated?

Hopefully you will have a chance to count them personally as a convicted racist abuser.

You continuing pattern of attacking me and my posts for no seemly reason other than my culture has been noted and will be forwarded.

I see you as one of the main racial abusers on this forum and a long lasting one. I will demanding that you are made an example of in any victim statement i have the chance to provide.
Yet another post from the illiterate, ill-informed, rabid elitist-racist aka E-types.

a) I have lived in Basildon since long before you rolled up, and I will still be
here long after they kick your sorry ar5e into touch.

b) I have never remarked on the number of ethnic minorities that are incarcerated

c) You have threatened lots of people on this forum with legal action - but as
always, you are just wind and p1ss.

No credibility at all - especially when you claim an IQ of 130!

Your funniest post yet!!

Oh! How we laughed!!
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]President3[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angryofessex[/bold] wrote: Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.[/p][/quote]Yup. He can brighten any room just by leaving it. Responsible for more hijacks than the PLO. Time and time again he has accused anyone who opposes his views is an idiot, a racist or a facist. Review the threads he as 'contributed' to and you will find that the overwhelming view of this forum is that he is to be humoured rather than ridiculed. Oh! How we laughed!!![/p][/quote]Do you ever say anything original or is that too much for your feeble brain to conjure up? You lies are there for all to see! I call only those who use racist abuse or racial slur a racist...those i call an idiot are those, like you, who post idiotic posts (such as your latest offering) Im not sure i have called anyone a fascist as i feel fascism isn't based on one ideology or on racism although that could be part of. The overwhelming view of racists, idiots, disturbed or prejudiced individuals is of no worry or concern to me, for what should i expect off a site burdened with such inadequate human beings? You for instance, you have no beef with the issue of any thread i am on but come on only to attack my posts or try to suggest in your feeble and pathetic way that you are superior to me in all ways when in truth you are not that in anyway. You came onto the site from another area, you dont even reside in Essex, pretending to be supporting Green Belt land and issues and yet your posts never concern themselves with that, as your lack of comment on this thread proves You use the threads to attack my posts and myself. I believe you do this to stop me posting and giving my opinion on issues. I believe you do this because of my culture and for no other reason. I believe in your case a pattern of that has been proven a long time back and you are bang to rights. Remember its not what i think in regards to your agenda that counts but what overs over viewing the whole matter think. You are wrapped up and waiting to go in my opinion so keep your toilet bag ready and hopefully your racism will be reported and those sharing any confined area with you will be aware of it. Wasn't it you a while back sprouting about how high a percentage of ethnic minorities were incarcerated? Hopefully you will have a chance to count them personally as a convicted racist abuser. You continuing pattern of attacking me and my posts for no seemly reason other than my culture has been noted and will be forwarded. I see you as one of the main racial abusers on this forum and a long lasting one. I will demanding that you are made an example of in any victim statement i have the chance to provide.[/p][/quote]Yet another post from the illiterate, ill-informed, rabid elitist-racist aka E-types. a) I have lived in Basildon since long before you rolled up, and I will still be here long after they kick your sorry ar5e into touch. b) I have never remarked on the number of ethnic minorities that are incarcerated c) You have threatened lots of people on this forum with legal action - but as always, you are just wind and p1ss. No credibility at all - especially when you claim an IQ of 130! Your funniest post yet!! Oh! How we laughed!! President3
  • Score: 5

8:40pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

squarewheels. wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
squarewheels. wrote: "Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist" Well, don't let that stop you calling people racist eh!
If a person makes, using a term society recognises, racist remarks then what do you suggest they should be called? Are you suggesting i should call them culturist via my belief? If not then your post is vacuous
You state in one of your many posts above that you have never said travellers were a different race. Your continual accusations of racism would indicate you believe otherwise. How can you tell us what society recognises as a racist remark when you choose to live a life of exclusion from mainstream society?

It would, no doubt, very convenient for you if travellers were a different race but the science is just not there is it. Was that why the Wilson report was commissioned? But that was almost 2 years ago, why have the finds not yet been publically released? Can we have an answer that does'nt involve unicorns please.
I have explained this in the very post you quote!

Shall i quote what you have quoted from what i posted? * sighs*

" If a person makes, using a term society recognises, racist remarks then what do you suggest they should be called"

The term 'racism' is the one used and recognised within society when referring to abuse (among other crimes) because of cultural difference ! Im not responsible for society's decision to use this term.

So your assertion my using that term, shows i have a belief in Travellers being another race, doesn't really stand up to even mild scrutiny does it

Are you saying you have to be told what is or isn't a racist remark otherwise you wouldn't know it? I feel a little research might give you the information you seem to lack.

"How can you tell us what society recognises as a racist remark when you choose to live a life of exclusion from mainstream society?"

The definition of racism is legion!

Heres one that isn't too complicated

"Racism may be defined as the hatred of one person by another -- or the belief that another person is less than human -- because of skin color, language, customs, place of birth or any factor that supposedly reveals the basic nature of that person."

Nothing there about being excluded from the protection of the race relations Act because of cultural traditions and difference. Ie living a insular life!

Can ethnic minority Nuns and Monks, living in seclusion, be considered fodder for racism because of their insular life's?

I think you have got the wrong end of the stick here my friend. My belief is there is only one race but many cultures.
So convenience doesn't come into it.

Science hasn't played a great part in defining race as far as i know.
You might know differently.

Im not sure what those who feel humans beings belong to different race's actually mean by that! Do you?

I believe the investigation into Pavee DNA was to try to trace back to where Pavee came from? (The term Traveller is another term given out by society) Not to see if they were a different race! It certainly proved Pavee was a different culture to the Irish.

I believe the crux of the report has been reported on and it isn't much.

It seems to state Pavee are a distinct culture from the Irish culture

That Pavee broke away from the Irish culture but they cant say why or how they came to that conclusion.

That Pavee have the same unique DNA strand that isn't matched anywhere in the world (which would seem to undermine their tenuous connection to the Irish)

What else may be within the report who knows. maybe thats the meat of it.

The amazing thing is, there are certain elder Pavee who could of informed them of this if they had but asked in the correct manner!

To some up Travellers are not a different potato crisp just a different flavour!
[quote][p][bold]squarewheels.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]squarewheels.[/bold] wrote: "Provide the post where i state we are a different race? It doesn't exist" Well, don't let that stop you calling people racist eh![/p][/quote]If a person makes, using a term society recognises, racist remarks then what do you suggest they should be called? Are you suggesting i should call them culturist via my belief? If not then your post is vacuous[/p][/quote]You state in one of your many posts above that you have never said travellers were a different race. Your continual accusations of racism would indicate you believe otherwise. How can you tell us what society recognises as a racist remark when you choose to live a life of exclusion from mainstream society? It would, no doubt, very convenient for you if travellers were a different race but the science is just not there is it. Was that why the Wilson report was commissioned? But that was almost 2 years ago, why have the finds not yet been publically released? Can we have an answer that does'nt involve unicorns please.[/p][/quote]I have explained this in the very post you quote! Shall i quote what you have quoted from what i posted? * sighs* " If a person makes, using a term society recognises, racist remarks then what do you suggest they should be called" The term 'racism' is the one used and recognised within society when referring to abuse (among other crimes) because of cultural difference ! Im not responsible for society's decision to use this term. So your assertion my using that term, shows i have a belief in Travellers being another race, doesn't really stand up to even mild scrutiny does it Are you saying you have to be told what is or isn't a racist remark otherwise you wouldn't know it? I feel a little research might give you the information you seem to lack. "How can you tell us what society recognises as a racist remark when you choose to live a life of exclusion from mainstream society?" The definition of racism is legion! Heres one that isn't too complicated "Racism may be defined as the hatred of one person by another -- or the belief that another person is less than human -- because of skin color, language, customs, place of birth or any factor that supposedly reveals the basic nature of that person." Nothing there about being excluded from the protection of the race relations Act because of cultural traditions and difference. Ie living a insular life! Can ethnic minority Nuns and Monks, living in seclusion, be considered fodder for racism because of their insular life's? I think you have got the wrong end of the stick here my friend. My belief is there is only one race but many cultures. So convenience doesn't come into it. Science hasn't played a great part in defining race as far as i know. You might know differently. Im not sure what those who feel humans beings belong to different race's actually mean by that! Do you? I believe the investigation into Pavee DNA was to try to trace back to where Pavee came from? (The term Traveller is another term given out by society) Not to see if they were a different race! It certainly proved Pavee was a different culture to the Irish. I believe the crux of the report has been reported on and it isn't much. It seems to state Pavee are a distinct culture from the Irish culture That Pavee broke away from the Irish culture but they cant say why or how they came to that conclusion. That Pavee have the same unique DNA strand that isn't matched anywhere in the world (which would seem to undermine their tenuous connection to the Irish) What else may be within the report who knows. maybe thats the meat of it. The amazing thing is, there are certain elder Pavee who could of informed them of this if they had but asked in the correct manner! To some up Travellers are not a different potato crisp just a different flavour! E-Types..
  • Score: -5

8:48pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

muffindamule wrote:
fearsiuil wrote:
Yet again it seems the usual suspects on here want nothing more than to engage in the personal abuse and banter about abstract concepts,
while trying to ignore the embarrassing nonsense of
how the council botched up its expensive attempt to deal with another abstract concept,
namely, the "Greenbelt".

All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made.

Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property) we get
this diversionary tactic
where beano scriptwriters queue up to
try attack E Types.

And btw, Dale farm hasn't gone away, as one mistaken poster suggested.
It is still there but in devastated form.

Meanwhile we are on the side of our own road, just yards away.

So much for progress, eh? You dudes must have some IQ if you think the mess Tony made is somehow good.
Especially, if you really do care for what you constantly harp on about as "the greenbelt".

Complete and utter comedians, imo.
Good luck to ye! You'll certainly need it.
Hello fearsiuil, nice to see you back.
You say " Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property)".

Now come on, you can't have it both ways. Either the land is greenbelt or it is not. The courts have accepted that it is and there is nothing notional about that. Just how this gate which you keep on about came to be erected I don't know. If it was erected without planning permision and/or without the consent of the landowner then it should simply be removed. Is it such a big deal ? I believe I have asked you before just why you attach such importance to this gate and why you consider it to be of such relevance. I don't remember reading a reply.
Perhaps the carrot left dangling is why has the council allowed this man to build on what they consider GBL?

It doesn't matter whether the owners countenance it or not!
By the councils own 'laws' this isn't allowed!
Yet they have allowed it?
[quote][p][bold]muffindamule[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fearsiuil[/bold] wrote: Yet again it seems the usual suspects on here want nothing more than to engage in the personal abuse and banter about abstract concepts, while trying to ignore the embarrassing nonsense of how the council botched up its expensive attempt to deal with another abstract concept, namely, the "Greenbelt". All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made. Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property) we get this diversionary tactic where beano scriptwriters queue up to try attack E Types. And btw, Dale farm hasn't gone away, as one mistaken poster suggested. It is still there but in devastated form. Meanwhile we are on the side of our own road, just yards away. So much for progress, eh? You dudes must have some IQ if you think the mess Tony made is somehow good. Especially, if you really do care for what you constantly harp on about as "the greenbelt". Complete and utter comedians, imo. Good luck to ye! You'll certainly need it.[/p][/quote]Hello fearsiuil, nice to see you back. You say " Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property)". Now come on, you can't have it both ways. Either the land is greenbelt or it is not. The courts have accepted that it is and there is nothing notional about that. Just how this gate which you keep on about came to be erected I don't know. If it was erected without planning permision and/or without the consent of the landowner then it should simply be removed. Is it such a big deal ? I believe I have asked you before just why you attach such importance to this gate and why you consider it to be of such relevance. I don't remember reading a reply.[/p][/quote]Perhaps the carrot left dangling is why has the council allowed this man to build on what they consider GBL? It doesn't matter whether the owners countenance it or not! By the councils own 'laws' this isn't allowed! Yet they have allowed it? E-Types..
  • Score: -3

9:18pm Fri 7 Sep 12

muffindamule says...

E-Types.. wrote:
muffindamule wrote:
fearsiuil wrote:
Yet again it seems the usual suspects on here want nothing more than to engage in the personal abuse and banter about abstract concepts,
while trying to ignore the embarrassing nonsense of
how the council botched up its expensive attempt to deal with another abstract concept,
namely, the "Greenbelt".

All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made.

Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property) we get
this diversionary tactic
where beano scriptwriters queue up to
try attack E Types.

And btw, Dale farm hasn't gone away, as one mistaken poster suggested.
It is still there but in devastated form.

Meanwhile we are on the side of our own road, just yards away.

So much for progress, eh? You dudes must have some IQ if you think the mess Tony made is somehow good.
Especially, if you really do care for what you constantly harp on about as "the greenbelt".

Complete and utter comedians, imo.
Good luck to ye! You'll certainly need it.
Hello fearsiuil, nice to see you back.
You say " Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property)".

Now come on, you can't have it both ways. Either the land is greenbelt or it is not. The courts have accepted that it is and there is nothing notional about that. Just how this gate which you keep on about came to be erected I don't know. If it was erected without planning permision and/or without the consent of the landowner then it should simply be removed. Is it such a big deal ? I believe I have asked you before just why you attach such importance to this gate and why you consider it to be of such relevance. I don't remember reading a reply.
Perhaps the carrot left dangling is why has the council allowed this man to build on what they consider GBL?

It doesn't matter whether the owners countenance it or not!
By the councils own 'laws' this isn't allowed!
Yet they have allowed it?
Sounds as though you have a good point. Have you spoken to the council about it and if so, what do they have to say ?
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]muffindamule[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fearsiuil[/bold] wrote: Yet again it seems the usual suspects on here want nothing more than to engage in the personal abuse and banter about abstract concepts, while trying to ignore the embarrassing nonsense of how the council botched up its expensive attempt to deal with another abstract concept, namely, the "Greenbelt". All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made. Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property) we get this diversionary tactic where beano scriptwriters queue up to try attack E Types. And btw, Dale farm hasn't gone away, as one mistaken poster suggested. It is still there but in devastated form. Meanwhile we are on the side of our own road, just yards away. So much for progress, eh? You dudes must have some IQ if you think the mess Tony made is somehow good. Especially, if you really do care for what you constantly harp on about as "the greenbelt". Complete and utter comedians, imo. Good luck to ye! You'll certainly need it.[/p][/quote]Hello fearsiuil, nice to see you back. You say " Again, when we ask how come Len and co were allowed to build on the notional "greenbelt" including the gates actually ON the scrapyard ( another man's property)". Now come on, you can't have it both ways. Either the land is greenbelt or it is not. The courts have accepted that it is and there is nothing notional about that. Just how this gate which you keep on about came to be erected I don't know. If it was erected without planning permision and/or without the consent of the landowner then it should simply be removed. Is it such a big deal ? I believe I have asked you before just why you attach such importance to this gate and why you consider it to be of such relevance. I don't remember reading a reply.[/p][/quote]Perhaps the carrot left dangling is why has the council allowed this man to build on what they consider GBL? It doesn't matter whether the owners countenance it or not! By the councils own 'laws' this isn't allowed! Yet they have allowed it?[/p][/quote]Sounds as though you have a good point. Have you spoken to the council about it and if so, what do they have to say ? muffindamule
  • Score: 4

9:32pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
Squarewheels, you are right that the Wilson Cavalleri report (I take you have read it or the media reports on it) was actually commissioned by a high profile traveller who wanted to prove his ancestry was more exotic than it actually is. He failed miserably cos you can't dispute the science.
.
You are such a joker ET but then I suppose we should all be grateful that whilst you are wasting your time on here you are not out indulging in those favourite traveller pastimes of conning our OAPs or taking slaves. Btw I have dealt with clever people all my life and you aint it. When I was at Uni the first time MENSA were offering IQ tests at my college so I did the test out of interest (do you even know how long the test takes, go on tel me, bet you don't know) and I came out way above your claimed result (not telling how much cos you will only say it's not true). Others who did the test and came out around the 130 mark you claim to be were vastly intellectually superior to you matey so stop telling lies.
Has the poster you replied to read the report? ( or is this a desperate attempt to get someone to lie to support you)

Or has he read the type of article you have provided as proof of what the report says, although the article doesn't say what you say is what the report has said!

The only way to see if what you say the report said is fact is for you to provide the source from where you got the information you state came from the report! The paper doesn't state what you state does it? Put up the source!

The report was not commissioned by Travellers but by the documentary company.

Would you say BFGW was commissioned by the Travellers who appeared in it?

You struggle to remain creditable when you come out with such rubbish.

It must be clear to all if you could post any source that stated what you said it stated you would have had it posted up 5 months ago and ten times on this thread alone.
In the same way you post the link to an article stating there was a investigation in the DNA of Pavee's (not Travellers)

No link to source because the source doesn't exist, you LIED and have been filibustering since to cover that LIE. Proof that you are psychologically flawed imo.

Ah, now you return to slur to cover up the fact that you have been outed as a liar and a not very intelligent one at that.

You imply in your slur that i con OAPs and take slaves! That is something i will take up at a later date with you, when all investigations and actions are completed.

I really do hope you have other employment in mind for if you work with the public, you are going to be scrutinised and more than likely evaluated for fitness to deal with the public. And if you belong to a society that has a standards board you are going to be aNswering to them.

Does the so called 'profession' you belong to rip off epaulettes, buttons, stripes (or the equivalent) i do hope so.

Are you guilty of paedophila, rape, murder? By your own logic you are!

Members of your community certainly are which means, going by your intelligent reasoning, you are too.

In every post from now on can i accuse you of paedophila?

Im not sure you opinion on who or what is clever is worth anything! Not when your posts show you clearly lack even the average level of understanding on issue on this thread and indeed site. I mean you are pig thick!

I have never taken the Mensa test and have no intention of doing so...isn't such membership just a way of feeling superior to those around you?
Id be more impressed by the Mensa membership and organisation if they put their intelligence to solving issue's in this country which would be a benefit to all.
Carrying a Mensa card is as meaningless as carrying a bottle of designer water and much less useful.

University college? Is that the same as University?

So you have a higher IQ than I, ( you would have wouldn't you) well who would of thought it, of course you do and you prove it every time you engage with me! I wipe the floor with you every time and you know it!

Im sorry but you have been shown to be a liar on here in regards to this report that you say you read but refuse to produce (while trying to ask others to say they have read it too) so this claim of mensa snobbery has to be put into the same category..ie its a LIE.

Id say those who came out around the 130 mark were at least 40 marks higher than you.

It does seem going of a few comments on this thread that people believe the report hasn't been released? now either they are wrong and it has or you have never read the report and thus proven to be a LIAR! Which is it?
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: Squarewheels, you are right that the Wilson Cavalleri report (I take you have read it or the media reports on it) was actually commissioned by a high profile traveller who wanted to prove his ancestry was more exotic than it actually is. He failed miserably cos you can't dispute the science. . You are such a joker ET but then I suppose we should all be grateful that whilst you are wasting your time on here you are not out indulging in those favourite traveller pastimes of conning our OAPs or taking slaves. Btw I have dealt with clever people all my life and you aint it. When I was at Uni the first time MENSA were offering IQ tests at my college so I did the test out of interest (do you even know how long the test takes, go on tel me, bet you don't know) and I came out way above your claimed result (not telling how much cos you will only say it's not true). Others who did the test and came out around the 130 mark you claim to be were vastly intellectually superior to you matey so stop telling lies.[/p][/quote]Has the poster you replied to read the report? ( or is this a desperate attempt to get someone to lie to support you) Or has he read the type of article you have provided as proof of what the report says, although the article doesn't say what you say is what the report has said! The only way to see if what you say the report said is fact is for you to provide the source from where you got the information you state came from the report! The paper doesn't state what you state does it? Put up the source! The report was not commissioned by Travellers but by the documentary company. Would you say BFGW was commissioned by the Travellers who appeared in it? You struggle to remain creditable when you come out with such rubbish. It must be clear to all if you could post any source that stated what you said it stated you would have had it posted up 5 months ago and ten times on this thread alone. In the same way you post the link to an article stating there was a investigation in the DNA of Pavee's (not Travellers) No link to source because the source doesn't exist, you LIED and have been filibustering since to cover that LIE. Proof that you are psychologically flawed imo. Ah, now you return to slur to cover up the fact that you have been outed as a liar and a not very intelligent one at that. You imply in your slur that i con OAPs and take slaves! That is something i will take up at a later date with you, when all investigations and actions are completed. I really do hope you have other employment in mind for if you work with the public, you are going to be scrutinised and more than likely evaluated for fitness to deal with the public. And if you belong to a society that has a standards board you are going to be aNswering to them. Does the so called 'profession' you belong to rip off epaulettes, buttons, stripes (or the equivalent) i do hope so. Are you guilty of paedophila, rape, murder? By your own logic you are! Members of your community certainly are which means, going by your intelligent reasoning, you are too. In every post from now on can i accuse you of paedophila? Im not sure you opinion on who or what is clever is worth anything! Not when your posts show you clearly lack even the average level of understanding on issue on this thread and indeed site. I mean you are pig thick! I have never taken the Mensa test and have no intention of doing so...isn't such membership just a way of feeling superior to those around you? Id be more impressed by the Mensa membership and organisation if they put their intelligence to solving issue's in this country which would be a benefit to all. Carrying a Mensa card is as meaningless as carrying a bottle of designer water and much less useful. University college? Is that the same as University? So you have a higher IQ than I, ( you would have wouldn't you) well who would of thought it, of course you do and you prove it every time you engage with me! I wipe the floor with you every time and you know it! Im sorry but you have been shown to be a liar on here in regards to this report that you say you read but refuse to produce (while trying to ask others to say they have read it too) so this claim of mensa snobbery has to be put into the same category..ie its a LIE. Id say those who came out around the 130 mark were at least 40 marks higher than you. It does seem going of a few comments on this thread that people believe the report hasn't been released? now either they are wrong and it has or you have never read the report and thus proven to be a LIAR! Which is it? E-Types..
  • Score: -5

9:35pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

squarewheels. wrote:
God Almighty wrote:
Squarewheels, you are right that the Wilson Cavalleri report (I take you have read it or the media reports on it) was actually commissioned by a high profile traveller who wanted to prove his ancestry was more exotic than it actually is. He failed miserably cos you can't dispute the science. . You are such a joker ET but then I suppose we should all be grateful that whilst you are wasting your time on here you are not out indulging in those favourite traveller pastimes of conning our OAPs or taking slaves. Btw I have dealt with clever people all my life and you aint it. When I was at Uni the first time MENSA were offering IQ tests at my college so I did the test out of interest (do you even know how long the test takes, go on tel me, bet you don't know) and I came out way above your claimed result (not telling how much cos you will only say it's not true). Others who did the test and came out around the 130 mark you claim to be were vastly intellectually superior to you matey so stop telling lies.
I have read many media references but not the final Wilson report. Dr Wilson has a site with downloads of his published works but there is no sign of it. After 2 years the work must have been finished and one can only assume that he is not free to release the findings.
Why not email him and ask rather than making assumptions? Not rocker science is it?
[quote][p][bold]squarewheels.[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: Squarewheels, you are right that the Wilson Cavalleri report (I take you have read it or the media reports on it) was actually commissioned by a high profile traveller who wanted to prove his ancestry was more exotic than it actually is. He failed miserably cos you can't dispute the science. . You are such a joker ET but then I suppose we should all be grateful that whilst you are wasting your time on here you are not out indulging in those favourite traveller pastimes of conning our OAPs or taking slaves. Btw I have dealt with clever people all my life and you aint it. When I was at Uni the first time MENSA were offering IQ tests at my college so I did the test out of interest (do you even know how long the test takes, go on tel me, bet you don't know) and I came out way above your claimed result (not telling how much cos you will only say it's not true). Others who did the test and came out around the 130 mark you claim to be were vastly intellectually superior to you matey so stop telling lies.[/p][/quote]I have read many media references but not the final Wilson report. Dr Wilson has a site with downloads of his published works but there is no sign of it. After 2 years the work must have been finished and one can only assume that he is not free to release the findings.[/p][/quote]Why not email him and ask rather than making assumptions? Not rocker science is it? E-Types..
  • Score: -4

9:41pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

doasilikey wrote:
Hey Hey! Stanley's back!
Yes indeed you are.
[quote][p][bold]doasilikey[/bold] wrote: Hey Hey! Stanley's back![/p][/quote]Yes indeed you are. E-Types..
  • Score: -6

9:46pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

doasilikey wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
doasilikey wrote:
@ fearsiuil:

I take it that when you say "All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made." you are alluding to the decision by a large number of chancers to breach planning regs. and set up an illegal traveller site on land adjacent to the legal site at DF?
Ah one of the vultures, your a bit late aren't you? Where have you been?

I hope you havent been standing in the high street again, glaring at people you believe to be Travellers. Its going to get you into trouble one day if not sectioned.
No, I've been gainfully employed and providing the exchequer with some tax monies in order that the country can function. You?
Yes.

Now that you are back, if i say anything that you struggle with dont get in a hissy fit of abuse, just ask me to simplify it and i will.
[quote][p][bold]doasilikey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]doasilikey[/bold] wrote: @ fearsiuil: I take it that when you say "All perfectly understandable; nobody likes to be reminded of any terrible mistake that he/she/it has made." you are alluding to the decision by a large number of chancers to breach planning regs. and set up an illegal traveller site on land adjacent to the legal site at DF?[/p][/quote]Ah one of the vultures, your a bit late aren't you? Where have you been? I hope you havent been standing in the high street again, glaring at people you believe to be Travellers. Its going to get you into trouble one day if not sectioned.[/p][/quote]No, I've been gainfully employed and providing the exchequer with some tax monies in order that the country can function. You?[/p][/quote]Yes. Now that you are back, if i say anything that you struggle with dont get in a hissy fit of abuse, just ask me to simplify it and i will. E-Types..
  • Score: -5

10:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

President3 wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
President3 wrote:
angryofessex wrote:
Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.
Yup.

He can brighten any room just by leaving it.

Responsible for more hijacks than the PLO.

Time and time again he has accused anyone who opposes his views is an idiot, a racist or a facist.

Review the threads he as 'contributed' to and you will find that the overwhelming view of this forum is that he is to be humoured rather than ridiculed.

Oh! How we laughed!!!
Do you ever say anything original or is that too much for your feeble brain to conjure up?

You lies are there for all to see!

I call only those who use racist abuse or racial slur a racist...those i call an idiot are those, like you, who post idiotic posts (such as your latest offering)

Im not sure i have called anyone a fascist as i feel fascism isn't based on one ideology or on racism although that could be part of.

The overwhelming view of racists, idiots, disturbed or prejudiced individuals is of no worry or concern to me, for what should i expect off a site burdened with such inadequate human beings?

You for instance, you have no beef with the issue of any thread i am on but come on only to attack my posts or try to suggest in your feeble and pathetic way that you are superior to me in all ways when in truth you are not that in anyway.

You came onto the site from another area, you dont even reside in Essex, pretending to be supporting Green Belt land and issues and yet your posts never concern themselves with that, as your lack of comment on this thread proves

You use the threads to attack my posts and myself. I believe you do this to stop me posting and giving my opinion on issues. I believe you do this because of my culture and for no other reason.

I believe in your case a pattern of that has been proven a long time back and you are bang to rights. Remember its not what i think in regards to your agenda that counts but what overs over viewing the whole matter think.

You are wrapped up and waiting to go in my opinion so keep your toilet bag ready and hopefully your racism will be reported and those sharing any confined area with you will be aware of it.

Wasn't it you a while back sprouting about how high a percentage of ethnic minorities were incarcerated?

Hopefully you will have a chance to count them personally as a convicted racist abuser.

You continuing pattern of attacking me and my posts for no seemly reason other than my culture has been noted and will be forwarded.

I see you as one of the main racial abusers on this forum and a long lasting one. I will demanding that you are made an example of in any victim statement i have the chance to provide.
Yet another post from the illiterate, ill-informed, rabid elitist-racist aka E-types.

a) I have lived in Basildon since long before you rolled up, and I will still be
here long after they kick your sorry ar5e into touch.

b) I have never remarked on the number of ethnic minorities that are incarcerated

c) You have threatened lots of people on this forum with legal action - but as
always, you are just wind and p1ss.

No credibility at all - especially when you claim an IQ of 130!

Your funniest post yet!!

Oh! How we laughed!!
Sorry in your reply to my post you seemed to have missed the simple questions ask of you, i wonder if you would be so good as to answer them if you can. Of course it will be totally understandably if you cant as you do struggle a bit dont you...poor soul!

So now you are stating you live in Basildon? Oh! When did you move back?

Or was it you never moved away just pretended you did to make mention of another site in another area that you stated you live beside!

Are you sure you know where you live, i mean ill call you a taxi if you like?

Im sorry but you will be long gone before i leave Basildon...in a simular way as you! I have the years on you.

Im afraid you did remark on the number of ethic minorities in prison but of course not in that manner but in your usual ranting manner picking out the cultural difference. but again its understandable that you might forget considering all the hate and abuse you have incited and took part in on this site. No matter its collated.

I have explained that legal action is pendent on other investigations and actions occurring first. Now hug you comfort blanket for you know deep down your day in the spot light is coming and rightly so you deserve it.

I dont claim an IQ of 130! I state that's what was indicated by the results of was the tests i took.

Im looking forward to see how long you laugh for. Those who laugh last etc.
[quote][p][bold]President3[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]President3[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angryofessex[/bold] wrote: Once again the tread is dominated by infantile comments from E Types. Please find something else to do, you are ruining this site.[/p][/quote]Yup. He can brighten any room just by leaving it. Responsible for more hijacks than the PLO. Time and time again he has accused anyone who opposes his views is an idiot, a racist or a facist. Review the threads he as 'contributed' to and you will find that the overwhelming view of this forum is that he is to be humoured rather than ridiculed. Oh! How we laughed!!![/p][/quote]Do you ever say anything original or is that too much for your feeble brain to conjure up? You lies are there for all to see! I call only those who use racist abuse or racial slur a racist...those i call an idiot are those, like you, who post idiotic posts (such as your latest offering) Im not sure i have called anyone a fascist as i feel fascism isn't based on one ideology or on racism although that could be part of. The overwhelming view of racists, idiots, disturbed or prejudiced individuals is of no worry or concern to me, for what should i expect off a site burdened with such inadequate human beings? You for instance, you have no beef with the issue of any thread i am on but come on only to attack my posts or try to suggest in your feeble and pathetic way that you are superior to me in all ways when in truth you are not that in anyway. You came onto the site from another area, you dont even reside in Essex, pretending to be supporting Green Belt land and issues and yet your posts never concern themselves with that, as your lack of comment on this thread proves You use the threads to attack my posts and myself. I believe you do this to stop me posting and giving my opinion on issues. I believe you do this because of my culture and for no other reason. I believe in your case a pattern of that has been proven a long time back and you are bang to rights. Remember its not what i think in regards to your agenda that counts but what overs over viewing the whole matter think. You are wrapped up and waiting to go in my opinion so keep your toilet bag ready and hopefully your racism will be reported and those sharing any confined area with you will be aware of it. Wasn't it you a while back sprouting about how high a percentage of ethnic minorities were incarcerated? Hopefully you will have a chance to count them personally as a convicted racist abuser. You continuing pattern of attacking me and my posts for no seemly reason other than my culture has been noted and will be forwarded. I see you as one of the main racial abusers on this forum and a long lasting one. I will demanding that you are made an example of in any victim statement i have the chance to provide.[/p][/quote]Yet another post from the illiterate, ill-informed, rabid elitist-racist aka E-types. a) I have lived in Basildon since long before you rolled up, and I will still be here long after they kick your sorry ar5e into touch. b) I have never remarked on the number of ethnic minorities that are incarcerated c) You have threatened lots of people on this forum with legal action - but as always, you are just wind and p1ss. No credibility at all - especially when you claim an IQ of 130! Your funniest post yet!! Oh! How we laughed!![/p][/quote]Sorry in your reply to my post you seemed to have missed the simple questions ask of you, i wonder if you would be so good as to answer them if you can. Of course it will be totally understandably if you cant as you do struggle a bit dont you...poor soul! So now you are stating you live in Basildon? Oh! When did you move back? Or was it you never moved away just pretended you did to make mention of another site in another area that you stated you live beside! Are you sure you know where you live, i mean ill call you a taxi if you like? Im sorry but you will be long gone before i leave Basildon...in a simular way as you! I have the years on you. Im afraid you did remark on the number of ethic minorities in prison but of course not in that manner but in your usual ranting manner picking out the cultural difference. but again its understandable that you might forget considering all the hate and abuse you have incited and took part in on this site. No matter its collated. I have explained that legal action is pendent on other investigations and actions occurring first. Now hug you comfort blanket for you know deep down your day in the spot light is coming and rightly so you deserve it. I dont claim an IQ of 130! I state that's what was indicated by the results of was the tests i took. Im looking forward to see how long you laugh for. Those who laugh last etc. E-Types..
  • Score: -5

11:04pm Fri 7 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

" Yet another post from the illiterate, ill-informed, rabid elitist-racist aka E-types."

Perhaps you might be able to explain your post?

Illiterate: You do know what that means dont you? I mean you do...right?

Ill-informed: There is not a soul on earth that Isn't ill-informed about something or other! Isn't that the case? So your point is?

Rabid elitist-racist: WOW this is opened to so much interpretation that only you can explain what you mean!

Can you expand on that, if in trying to do so your little brain doesn't also expand and dribble out of your nose.


You really are a strange weird person!

Do dogs run away from you when you approach them?

Do cats arch their backs and spit?

Do children cry when you smile at them?

Do women instinctively and nervously shift about when your in close proximity?

Do men dislike you on sight?

Im not saying this is the case im just asking.
" Yet another post from the illiterate, ill-informed, rabid elitist-racist aka E-types." Perhaps you might be able to explain your post? Illiterate: You do know what that means dont you? I mean you do...right? Ill-informed: There is not a soul on earth that Isn't ill-informed about something or other! Isn't that the case? So your point is? Rabid elitist-racist: WOW this is opened to so much interpretation that only you can explain what you mean! Can you expand on that, if in trying to do so your little brain doesn't also expand and dribble out of your nose. You really are a strange weird person! Do dogs run away from you when you approach them? Do cats arch their backs and spit? Do children cry when you smile at them? Do women instinctively and nervously shift about when your in close proximity? Do men dislike you on sight? Im not saying this is the case im just asking. E-Types..
  • Score: -6

11:55pm Fri 7 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Strewth! You really should talk to a doctor ET, before you burst a blood vessel. First you deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists, now you admit it does (but still no apology) but you say it doesn't say what I told you it says - that you lot are just Irish people who were kicked out of their homes, which is exactly what it says and it even says that in the Irish press. No point arguing with demented fools like you, you never admit when you are wrong, which you are a a lot of the time. I honestly think you are suffering from a mental illness, you really should see your Doctor quick, you shouldn't be allowed out on your own.
Strewth! You really should talk to a doctor ET, before you burst a blood vessel. First you deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists, now you admit it does (but still no apology) but you say it doesn't say what I told you it says - that you lot are just Irish people who were kicked out of their homes, which is exactly what it says and it even says that in the Irish press. No point arguing with demented fools like you, you never admit when you are wrong, which you are a a lot of the time. I honestly think you are suffering from a mental illness, you really should see your Doctor quick, you shouldn't be allowed out on your own. God Almighty
  • Score: 4

12:19am Sat 8 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
Strewth! You really should talk to a doctor ET, before you burst a blood vessel. First you deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists, now you admit it does (but still no apology) but you say it doesn't say what I told you it says - that you lot are just Irish people who were kicked out of their homes, which is exactly what it says and it even says that in the Irish press. No point arguing with demented fools like you, you never admit when you are wrong, which you are a a lot of the time. I honestly think you are suffering from a mental illness, you really should see your Doctor quick, you shouldn't be allowed out on your own.
I see, so the fact i can confront you and resident3 and others at the same time makes you think im unders stress and strained? LOL

I have a thread where i was dealing with 9 (nine) attacking posters at once!

I deny the report exists as you state it does! And have always stated just that!

The problem is you dont understand the nicety of what i have always denied. Notwithstanding your higher than 130 IQ.

Others on this thread have stated correctly that to date it hasn't been put into the public domain, yet you insist you have read it and even quote from it!

Thats where a certain branch of medicine is need!

There is no report that states Pavee (Travellers) were Irish people kicked out of their homes! Not even on the links you provide of reports on the test! This is a new twist to the information you say you gleaned from a report not yet available to the public.

Why dont you answer why you dont post up the source you got your information from, not a link to a newspaper but a link to the actual source?

You provide a link and then state something that isn't in the link and then accuse me of being demented...LOL

You are really disturbed. I seriously intend to have you investigated in case you are actually in a position of trust with the public and might have Travellers welfare to consider in you occupation

(Although you are such a liar you are probably a shelf stacker).
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: Strewth! You really should talk to a doctor ET, before you burst a blood vessel. First you deny the Wilson Cavalleri report exists, now you admit it does (but still no apology) but you say it doesn't say what I told you it says - that you lot are just Irish people who were kicked out of their homes, which is exactly what it says and it even says that in the Irish press. No point arguing with demented fools like you, you never admit when you are wrong, which you are a a lot of the time. I honestly think you are suffering from a mental illness, you really should see your Doctor quick, you shouldn't be allowed out on your own.[/p][/quote]I see, so the fact i can confront you and resident3 and others at the same time makes you think im unders stress and strained? LOL I have a thread where i was dealing with 9 (nine) attacking posters at once! I deny the report exists as you state it does! And have always stated just that! The problem is you dont understand the nicety of what i have always denied. Notwithstanding your higher than 130 IQ. Others on this thread have stated correctly that to date it hasn't been put into the public domain, yet you insist you have read it and even quote from it! Thats where a certain branch of medicine is need! There is no report that states Pavee (Travellers) were Irish people kicked out of their homes! Not even on the links you provide of reports on the test! This is a new twist to the information you say you gleaned from a report not yet available to the public. Why dont you answer why you dont post up the source you got your information from, not a link to a newspaper but a link to the actual source? You provide a link and then state something that isn't in the link and then accuse me of being demented...LOL You are really disturbed. I seriously intend to have you investigated in case you are actually in a position of trust with the public and might have Travellers welfare to consider in you occupation (Although you are such a liar you are probably a shelf stacker). E-Types..
  • Score: -6

10:34am Sat 8 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Ha ha, you are such a joker ET, you should be on the stage. And I never lie but you misinterpret and distort everything that is said to you, a sure sign of a sad twisted mind. You really should take those pills the Doctors prescribed for you.
Ha ha, you are such a joker ET, you should be on the stage. And I never lie but you misinterpret and distort everything that is said to you, a sure sign of a sad twisted mind. You really should take those pills the Doctors prescribed for you. God Almighty
  • Score: 4

12:10pm Sat 8 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

It is abundantly clear that you lie and constantly. It is also abundantly clear why you lie.

Now ill state it again so maybe you will see how you are shown to be a liar to all the site. The dont need to take into account the personalities involved just the evidence in front of them.

You have stated for months that you have read a report that newspapers and informed individuals have stated hasn't been released into the public domain.

Notwithstanding that, to prove you have read the report you provide links to newspaper articles that make mention of a report, they also mention the report hasn't been released into the public domain. You provide something as proof of what you say that disproves what you claim!

And yet you dont get it! And you with a near genius IQ.

When you are reasoned with, and its requested that all this can be cleared up with you providing a link to the report you've read, you ignore that and re-post articles that disprove your claim!


You try to get others to say they have read the report too, in fact one of those you try to pathetically solicit support off by telling him you take it he has read the report replies

" I have read many media references but not the final Wilson report. Dr Wilson has a site with downloads of his published works but there is no sign of it. After 2 years the work must have been finished and one can only assume that he is not free to release the findings."

Here you have a poster who has researched the issue seemingly quite throughly and states clearly that this report, that you claim to have read, has not been released! Yet you still maintain you have read it and even quote from it but refuse to provide a link for it.

This shows clearly you are a pathological liar. You have been caught out in a lie, one fashioned to slur a community, and then you invent a whole raft of lies to cover that lie. Listed below.

You are part of a high society held in high esteem

That you have been to UNI twice.

That you have a near genius IQ

That for years you have mixed with extreme clever people and in fact your

"the one who belongs to one of the most respected professions and a member of a Royal Institute, which takes years of study at Uni"

Which bears investigation in regards to your comments on this site.

That you have posted reports from newspapers when in fact you post the same one all the time.

You should not be working with the public and i think its my civil duty to report you to make sure you are not dealing with what might be vulnerable people. Which might include people you have a pathological intense hate for!


For those who wonder why a more fuller report hasn't been released this might help quell any conspiracy theories

" Dr Wilson said he wants to carry out more research to pin down a more accurate date for the split and look at historical records for that period to try and find out why it occurred. "


He hasn't finished it research! What scientist releases a report on a half researched investigation?

here we have the clear proof that the poster who states he read the report and quotes from it is lying.
It is abundantly clear that you lie and constantly. It is also abundantly clear why you lie. Now ill state it again so maybe you will see how you are shown to be a liar to all the site. The dont need to take into account the personalities involved just the evidence in front of them. You have stated for months that you have read a report that newspapers and informed individuals have stated hasn't been released into the public domain. Notwithstanding that, to prove you have read the report you provide links to newspaper articles that make mention of a report, they also mention the report hasn't been released into the public domain. You provide something as proof of what you say that disproves what you claim! And yet you dont get it! And you with a near genius IQ. When you are reasoned with, and its requested that all this can be cleared up with you providing a link to the report you've read, you ignore that and re-post articles that disprove your claim! You try to get others to say they have read the report too, in fact one of those you try to pathetically solicit support off by telling him you take it he has read the report replies " I have read many media references but not the final Wilson report. Dr Wilson has a site with downloads of his published works but there is no sign of it. After 2 years the work must have been finished and one can only assume that he is not free to release the findings." Here you have a poster who has researched the issue seemingly quite throughly and states clearly that this report, that you claim to have read, has not been released! Yet you still maintain you have read it and even quote from it but refuse to provide a link for it. This shows clearly you are a pathological liar. You have been caught out in a lie, one fashioned to slur a community, and then you invent a whole raft of lies to cover that lie. Listed below. You are part of a high society held in high esteem That you have been to UNI twice. That you have a near genius IQ That for years you have mixed with extreme clever people and in fact your "the one who belongs to one of the most respected professions and a member of a Royal Institute, which takes years of study at Uni" Which bears investigation in regards to your comments on this site. That you have posted reports from newspapers when in fact you post the same one all the time. You should not be working with the public and i think its my civil duty to report you to make sure you are not dealing with what might be vulnerable people. Which might include people you have a pathological intense hate for! For those who wonder why a more fuller report hasn't been released this might help quell any conspiracy theories " Dr Wilson said he wants to carry out more research to pin down a more accurate date for the split and look at historical records for that period to try and find out why it occurred. " He hasn't finished it research! What scientist releases a report on a half researched investigation? here we have the clear proof that the poster who states he read the report and quotes from it is lying. E-Types..
  • Score: -7

12:33pm Sat 8 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Ha ha! This is just like being back in the playground, childish logic, childish name calling, childish threats and all (btw I'm still waiting for the Police to call, not). As I've said before ET if the press reports aren't good enough for you then show us all how clever you are (or claim to be, ha ha!) and find the report yourself. Do you seriously think the Irish press just made it all up? That might be the sort of thing you would do but I'd expect better of the Irish press. Have a nice day sweetie x
Ha ha! This is just like being back in the playground, childish logic, childish name calling, childish threats and all (btw I'm still waiting for the Police to call, not). As I've said before ET if the press reports aren't good enough for you then show us all how clever you are (or claim to be, ha ha!) and find the report yourself. Do you seriously think the Irish press just made it all up? That might be the sort of thing you would do but I'd expect better of the Irish press. Have a nice day sweetie x God Almighty
  • Score: 4

1:46pm Sat 8 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
Ha ha! This is just like being back in the playground, childish logic, childish name calling, childish threats and all (btw I'm still waiting for the Police to call, not). As I've said before ET if the press reports aren't good enough for you then show us all how clever you are (or claim to be, ha ha!) and find the report yourself. Do you seriously think the Irish press just made it all up? That might be the sort of thing you would do but I'd expect better of the Irish press. Have a nice day sweetie x
Childish Logic? It is childish in its simplicity to remedy for sure.

You make a claim (stating you have a report) and post quotes from that.

You are asked to post up the source of your quotes, you ignore that request and instead put up links to newspapers that undermine your claim! Yet you still use these links to reiterate your claims.

You call on another to substantiate and support your claim, that other replies with a post that further undermines your claim "Dr Wilson has a site with downloads of his published works but there is no sign of it"

Yet not withstanding that informed comment you continue with your claim to having read this report!

All else in your post is a failed attempt to distract people from the issue. Which is the report, your quotes, the lack of link to source and the proof this report has not been released.

Here is the simple remedy bit,

You post up the report that you say you quote from (a report I and others have proven hasn't been released yet and isn't in the public domain for you to have had access to it)

Thats it in a nutshell

Obfuscating like a demented psychopath to avoid admitting your lie only makes you look just like that!

Put up the source or it has to be accepted by all that you cant and your quotes are lies.

Btw, you have not once referred to the topic of this thread! Which suggests you are only on here to confront me and to make slurs about a whole community with invented quotes!

There are no threats but clear warnings of what will be carried out in the correct and given pace of time.
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: Ha ha! This is just like being back in the playground, childish logic, childish name calling, childish threats and all (btw I'm still waiting for the Police to call, not). As I've said before ET if the press reports aren't good enough for you then show us all how clever you are (or claim to be, ha ha!) and find the report yourself. Do you seriously think the Irish press just made it all up? That might be the sort of thing you would do but I'd expect better of the Irish press. Have a nice day sweetie x[/p][/quote]Childish Logic? It is childish in its simplicity to remedy for sure. You make a claim (stating you have a report) and post quotes from that. You are asked to post up the source of your quotes, you ignore that request and instead put up links to newspapers that undermine your claim! Yet you still use these links to reiterate your claims. You call on another to substantiate and support your claim, that other replies with a post that further undermines your claim "Dr Wilson has a site with downloads of his published works but there is no sign of it" Yet not withstanding that informed comment you continue with your claim to having read this report! All else in your post is a failed attempt to distract people from the issue. Which is the report, your quotes, the lack of link to source and the proof this report has not been released. Here is the simple remedy bit, You post up the report that you say you quote from (a report I and others have proven hasn't been released yet and isn't in the public domain for you to have had access to it) Thats it in a nutshell Obfuscating like a demented psychopath to avoid admitting your lie only makes you look just like that! Put up the source or it has to be accepted by all that you cant and your quotes are lies. Btw, you have not once referred to the topic of this thread! Which suggests you are only on here to confront me and to make slurs about a whole community with invented quotes! There are no threats but clear warnings of what will be carried out in the correct and given pace of time. E-Types..
  • Score: -7

2:10pm Sat 8 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Ha ha ha you are such a joker ET, but you know as well as I do that you are all mouth and no trousers. As for slurs on a whole community, if the DF travellers are all like you (which the evidence to date suggest is true) then you lot deserve a good slagging. Can't be bothered to spend time searching for the report, you've read the press reports on it, haven't you, so you find it if you are so clever. Donk.
Ha ha ha you are such a joker ET, but you know as well as I do that you are all mouth and no trousers. As for slurs on a whole community, if the DF travellers are all like you (which the evidence to date suggest is true) then you lot deserve a good slagging. Can't be bothered to spend time searching for the report, you've read the press reports on it, haven't you, so you find it if you are so clever. Donk. God Almighty
  • Score: 7

6:28pm Sat 8 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Now you try to pretend its all a joke thereby alluding to the reader its all jolly good fun.

It isn't a joke and you havent been jesting.. its been serious and your lies have been revealed....mostly by yourself.

" all mouth and no trousers" Well time will be the judge of that. Its clear you dont know what Travellers are like, more stubborn people you will never meet (double negative?)

What evidence do you have that Travellers are all the same regardless if that sameness is for the positive or negative?

You do puke out such dribble without thinking dont you?

You cant bother looking for the report because the report has never been released to the public!

Are you denying that?


Are you saying it has been released to the public?

You have been revealed as a very stupid, warped person and ironically enough by your own posts!

You cant escape proof of yourself by yourself.
Now you try to pretend its all a joke thereby alluding to the reader its all jolly good fun. It isn't a joke and you havent been jesting.. its been serious and your lies have been revealed....mostly by yourself. " all mouth and no trousers" Well time will be the judge of that. Its clear you dont know what Travellers are like, more stubborn people you will never meet (double negative?) What evidence do you have that Travellers are all the same regardless if that sameness is for the positive or negative? You do puke out such dribble without thinking dont you? You cant bother looking for the report because the report has never been released to the public! Are you denying that? Are you saying it has been released to the public? You have been revealed as a very stupid, warped person and ironically enough by your own posts! You cant escape proof of yourself by yourself. E-Types..
  • Score: -5

6:54pm Sat 8 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

You ridiculous little man, on another thread you are trying to claim that Councils don't own any land which is absolute hogwash, on here you are trying to cover up your own inadequacies with completely unjustifiable insults and meaningless threats of legal retribution that will never happen in a month of sundays. Are you sure you don't still go to Junior school because you come across like a small petulant child.
.
As for your claim that "Its clear you dont know what Travellers are like, more stubborn people you will never meet", oh I think we have found that out by dealing with you but just because you say something is so doesn't make it so no matter how much you rant and rave. And stubborness is not a positive quality, refusing to acknowledge the truth is a personality disorder. Didn't you learn anything from losing your DF case? Clearly not.
You ridiculous little man, on another thread you are trying to claim that Councils don't own any land which is absolute hogwash, on here you are trying to cover up your own inadequacies with completely unjustifiable insults and meaningless threats of legal retribution that will never happen in a month of sundays. Are you sure you don't still go to Junior school because you come across like a small petulant child. . As for your claim that "Its clear you dont know what Travellers are like, more stubborn people you will never meet", oh I think we have found that out by dealing with you but just because you say something is so doesn't make it so no matter how much you rant and rave. And stubborness is not a positive quality, refusing to acknowledge the truth is a personality disorder. Didn't you learn anything from losing your DF case? Clearly not. God Almighty
  • Score: 3

7:39pm Sat 8 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

As yet on the other thread you have not made any useful contribution to that or even shown that council do in fact own the land or social houses. You state they do but give no evidence other than you opinion and we all know what that is worth after the quoting from a report that has never been released or indeed probably isn't yet complete!

You have never been able to refute what i say and have even ignored it when your 'allies' tell you there is no evidence of the report you quote from being released although they have research the matter deeply!

I make no treats but gave warning which i intend will be carried out!
In dee its you who have made the treat f reporting me to the admin for proving you are a Liar!


It is clear its you with your ridiculous logic that all of a community is guilty for the crimes of a small minority with in it that is decidedly childish.

Do you still stand by that logic?

I have not ranted or raved put requested information and responded to your warped logic and lies.

I know you'd rather i didn't challenge you but when you lie about my community i will confront you and out you as a liar if you are indeed lying.

Tell the truth and the most i will do is disagree with you if its the case i do.

What part of the DF case are you referring to that we lost? The eviction? When something is lost very often there is something gained and that has been true about the DF eviction apart!

DF is still an ongoing issue with many more parts to come, losing one part isn't and doesn't mean the whole is and will be lost does it?

Again i point out you dont know anything, how we Travellers think, how we react, what we can and wont do.

We are considered thick and stupid yet there are many among us who cant read or write who are very talented in deed in many different ways.

people underestimate us...thats their mistake.

I have trounced you for months and if this was a boxing match you would have been dragged out of the ring by the audience to save your pride. You of course wont admit that and your cronies and those others with prejudices will also not admit it but they know the truth of the matter...as do you!
As yet on the other thread you have not made any useful contribution to that or even shown that council do in fact own the land or social houses. You state they do but give no evidence other than you opinion and we all know what that is worth after the quoting from a report that has never been released or indeed probably isn't yet complete! You have never been able to refute what i say and have even ignored it when your 'allies' tell you there is no evidence of the report you quote from being released although they have research the matter deeply! I make no treats but gave warning which i intend will be carried out! In dee its you who have made the treat f reporting me to the admin for proving you are a Liar! It is clear its you with your ridiculous logic that all of a community is guilty for the crimes of a small minority with in it that is decidedly childish. Do you still stand by that logic? I have not ranted or raved put requested information and responded to your warped logic and lies. I know you'd rather i didn't challenge you but when you lie about my community i will confront you and out you as a liar if you are indeed lying. Tell the truth and the most i will do is disagree with you if its the case i do. What part of the DF case are you referring to that we lost? The eviction? When something is lost very often there is something gained and that has been true about the DF eviction apart! DF is still an ongoing issue with many more parts to come, losing one part isn't and doesn't mean the whole is and will be lost does it? Again i point out you dont know anything, how we Travellers think, how we react, what we can and wont do. We are considered thick and stupid yet there are many among us who cant read or write who are very talented in deed in many different ways. people underestimate us...thats their mistake. I have trounced you for months and if this was a boxing match you would have been dragged out of the ring by the audience to save your pride. You of course wont admit that and your cronies and those others with prejudices will also not admit it but they know the truth of the matter...as do you! E-Types..
  • Score: -6

7:54pm Sat 8 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

ET: "We are considered thick and stupid"
.
I wonder why?
.
I really don't believe you, I have never met such a despicable ignoramus, are you for real or are you a dumb teenager having a laugh?
ET: "We are considered thick and stupid" . I wonder why? . I really don't believe you, I have never met such a despicable ignoramus, are you for real or are you a dumb teenager having a laugh? God Almighty
  • Score: 8

8:08pm Sat 8 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

You have been made to look very stupid and you fear dealing with the subject so now you pretend that its all a joke and a borded teenager giving you a hard time but its clear even if that was the case it wouldn't change the result.

You have been shown to be a liar and cant accept that so wriggle and squirm and sliter to try denigrate he who outed you as not only a thicko but as a pathological lair with a strange and weird logic and reasoning.

Its inadequate dimwads like you who underestimate us...my trouncing of you constantly is proof of that...You are a LIAR ...done and dusted!
You have been made to look very stupid and you fear dealing with the subject so now you pretend that its all a joke and a borded teenager giving you a hard time but its clear even if that was the case it wouldn't change the result. You have been shown to be a liar and cant accept that so wriggle and squirm and sliter to try denigrate he who outed you as not only a thicko but as a pathological lair with a strange and weird logic and reasoning. Its inadequate dimwads like you who underestimate us...my trouncing of you constantly is proof of that...You are a LIAR ...done and dusted! E-Types..
  • Score: -11

8:29pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Karl S Zimmerman says...

We thank His Excellency the Ambassador for Travellers for those well considered words. His community must be very proud of him.
We thank His Excellency the Ambassador for Travellers for those well considered words. His community must be very proud of him. Karl S Zimmerman
  • Score: 18

8:38pm Sat 8 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:
We thank His Excellency the Ambassador for Travellers for those well considered words. His community must be very proud of him.
The sad thing is they probably are.
[quote][p][bold]Karl S Zimmerman[/bold] wrote: We thank His Excellency the Ambassador for Travellers for those well considered words. His community must be very proud of him.[/p][/quote]The sad thing is they probably are. God Almighty
  • Score: 8

8:40pm Sat 8 Sep 12

King 'El says...

God Almighty wrote:
Karl S Zimmerman wrote:
We thank His Excellency the Ambassador for Travellers for those well considered words. His community must be very proud of him.
The sad thing is they probably are.
LOL. I was thinking exactly the same myself.
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Karl S Zimmerman[/bold] wrote: We thank His Excellency the Ambassador for Travellers for those well considered words. His community must be very proud of him.[/p][/quote]The sad thing is they probably are.[/p][/quote]LOL. I was thinking exactly the same myself. King 'El
  • Score: 6

9:01pm Sat 8 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:
We thank His Excellency the Ambassador for Travellers for those well considered words. His community must be very proud of him.
Anything even remotely relevant or constructive to post in regards to the issue being discussed?

Any challenge or evidence to prove what i say is wrong?

No?

Then back under your stone!
[quote][p][bold]Karl S Zimmerman[/bold] wrote: We thank His Excellency the Ambassador for Travellers for those well considered words. His community must be very proud of him.[/p][/quote]Anything even remotely relevant or constructive to post in regards to the issue being discussed? Any challenge or evidence to prove what i say is wrong? No? Then back under your stone! E-Types..
  • Score: -7

9:24pm Sat 8 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Can't be bothered, can't teach people who don't listen to anyone, don't want to learn and think they know it all.
Can't be bothered, can't teach people who don't listen to anyone, don't want to learn and think they know it all. God Almighty
  • Score: 6

9:56pm Sat 8 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Trounced to a standstill...anymore and you'd have to

A, Answer questions
B, Tell the truth

Hence your capitulation

And so 'perish' all Liars and hate merchants!
Trounced to a standstill...anymore and you'd have to A, Answer questions B, Tell the truth Hence your capitulation And so 'perish' all Liars and hate merchants! E-Types..
  • Score: -5

7:57am Sun 9 Sep 12

Karl S Zimmerman says...

E-Types.. wrote:
Trounced to a standstill...anymore and you'd have to

A, Answer questions
B, Tell the truth

Hence your capitulation

And so 'perish' all Liars and hate merchants!
Stage instruction:
Enter men in white coats.
[quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: Trounced to a standstill...anymore and you'd have to A, Answer questions B, Tell the truth Hence your capitulation And so 'perish' all Liars and hate merchants![/p][/quote]Stage instruction: Enter men in white coats. Karl S Zimmerman
  • Score: 5

11:39am Sun 9 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

Karl S Zimmerman wrote:
E-Types.. wrote:
Trounced to a standstill...anymore and you'd have to

A, Answer questions
B, Tell the truth

Hence your capitulation

And so 'perish' all Liars and hate merchants!
Stage instruction:
Enter men in white coats.
Like to expand on why you think that instruction is necessary ie debate the issue.

Or is it more of your characteristic sniping from the 'bushes' too frightened to engage in case you get the same treatment your little prejudiced ally got?

Its clear you, he and others like you wouldn't survive on a more balanced rational forum and so skulk on this one where you can support each other when confronted and challenged.

Weak and inadequate individuals to a man. (if thats how you can be termed)
[quote][p][bold]Karl S Zimmerman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E-Types..[/bold] wrote: Trounced to a standstill...anymore and you'd have to A, Answer questions B, Tell the truth Hence your capitulation And so 'perish' all Liars and hate merchants![/p][/quote]Stage instruction: Enter men in white coats.[/p][/quote]Like to expand on why you think that instruction is necessary ie debate the issue. Or is it more of your characteristic sniping from the 'bushes' too frightened to engage in case you get the same treatment your little prejudiced ally got? Its clear you, he and others like you wouldn't survive on a more balanced rational forum and so skulk on this one where you can support each other when confronted and challenged. Weak and inadequate individuals to a man. (if thats how you can be termed) E-Types..
  • Score: -5

12:12pm Sun 9 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.
ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more. God Almighty
  • Score: 5

12:57pm Sun 9 Sep 12

President3 says...

God Almighty wrote:
ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.
Couldn't agree more - and judging by the 'agree' and 'disagree' scores on each comment, 99% of this forum are in agreement.

ET thinks he is wise like a drunk man thinks he is sober.

Over the last year, we have had to put up with his drivel, his illiteracy, his baseless accusations and his legal threats - all of which amount to nothing.

He was full of cockiness before the High Court decision on DF, and now he is displaying all the traits of a very bad loser.

But hey-ho! Oh! How we laughed!
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.[/p][/quote]Couldn't agree more - and judging by the 'agree' and 'disagree' scores on each comment, 99% of this forum are in agreement. ET thinks he is wise like a drunk man thinks he is sober. Over the last year, we have had to put up with his drivel, his illiteracy, his baseless accusations and his legal threats - all of which amount to nothing. He was full of cockiness before the High Court decision on DF, and now he is displaying all the traits of a very bad loser. But hey-ho! Oh! How we laughed! President3
  • Score: 4

1:58pm Sun 9 Sep 12

God Almighty says...

Thank you President 3. Have a nice day.
Thank you President 3. Have a nice day. God Almighty
  • Score: 0

8:12pm Tue 11 Sep 12

fearsiuil says...

Hi
to all those ( ie just a few)
who wish to debate the subject matter of this thread,
may I apologise for being late in replying to your questions.
My only excuse is that it is expected that the council will shortly embark on another attack.
This time their aim will be to drive us off our lane. They claim they cannot find that we have legal title to its ownership!
Well, surprise, surprise!
Lets hope it's not just another bit of the notional "greenbelt" ( you know, the one they hid behind last year when they smashed us out of our homes on our own land)
that they've sold off to Notts County Council as well!

They're brilliant at juggling all sorts of nonsensical papers that always seems to justify the millions and millions of taxpayers' money
that they waste on achieving absolutely zilch.

The silly billies!

Right a few answers to your questions:

The only good reason for having ideas such as protecting the "greenbelt"
is that there is actually something that can resemble undeveloped country land that can indeed be saved for the good of the nation.
This is a principle that I would support myself.

Obviously, the constuction of Basildon New Town to rehouse poor folk from the slums of London
was the first breach , and nobody is ever going to turn back the clock on that one.
Folk have to live someplace. The British government decided to forsake some of the lovely Essex countryside for the good of the poor slum-dwellers.

That's just history.
Now, you may ask why do I say "notional greenbelt".

Well, whenever I have tried asking where exacly is THE LINE in relation to Oak Lane and south Crays Hill,
all I get is muted silence.
Quite obviously, even the most vociferous supporters of the council haven't got a scoobies!
They seem to allow some development here and some development there, and then, all of a sudden, after about twenty years, they
are told by HQ
to declare that part of Dale Farm is illegal
because it's on the so-called "greenbelt".

Alright, I ain't got a high IQ like ET and all those banterers who reckon they got even higher,
but no way am I silly enough not to be able to see right though
the council's phony argument here.

They allowed Len and others to do something that, if we were to do it, they'd declare it "illegal".
Fk me, this is England not Syria!

If they want to chat about things being illegal, how come they reckoned it was alright for Len to build something that was not even on his own land?

My faith in English justice is sorely shaken. I'm at the stage now that I sometimes wonder whether the Queen of England has got all paperwork square regarding Buckingham Palace!
I wouldn't put it past Tony and Len to dig up some obsure bit of paper that says they've every right to go and smash her place down and evict her.

And to think, that some misguided chumps on here were calling for that terrible duo to be knighted!!
Check the archives: I know it's unbelievable, but that what was written on this pathetic, anti-traveller paper last year.

Don't it make ye wonder about the sanity of some of the folk around?
Hi to all those ( ie just a few) who wish to debate the subject matter of this thread, may I apologise for being late in replying to your questions. My only excuse is that it is expected that the council will shortly embark on another attack. This time their aim will be to drive us off our lane. They claim they cannot find that we have legal title to its ownership! Well, surprise, surprise! Lets hope it's not just another bit of the notional "greenbelt" ( you know, the one they hid behind last year when they smashed us out of our homes on our own land) that they've sold off to Notts County Council as well! They're brilliant at juggling all sorts of nonsensical papers that always seems to justify the millions and millions of taxpayers' money that they waste on achieving absolutely zilch. The silly billies! Right a few answers to your questions: The only good reason for having ideas such as protecting the "greenbelt" is that there is actually something that can resemble undeveloped country land that can indeed be saved for the good of the nation. This is a principle that I would support myself. Obviously, the constuction of Basildon New Town to rehouse poor folk from the slums of London was the first breach , and nobody is ever going to turn back the clock on that one. Folk have to live someplace. The British government decided to forsake some of the lovely Essex countryside for the good of the poor slum-dwellers. That's just history. Now, you may ask why do I say "notional greenbelt". Well, whenever I have tried asking where exacly is THE LINE in relation to Oak Lane and south Crays Hill, all I get is muted silence. Quite obviously, even the most vociferous supporters of the council haven't got a scoobies! They seem to allow some development here and some development there, and then, all of a sudden, after about twenty years, they are told by HQ to declare that part of Dale Farm is illegal because it's on the so-called "greenbelt". Alright, I ain't got a high IQ like ET and all those banterers who reckon they got even higher, but no way am I silly enough not to be able to see right though the council's phony argument here. They allowed Len and others to do something that, if we were to do it, they'd declare it "illegal". Fk me, this is England not Syria! If they want to chat about things being illegal, how come they reckoned it was alright for Len to build something that was not even on his own land? My faith in English justice is sorely shaken. I'm at the stage now that I sometimes wonder whether the Queen of England has got all paperwork square regarding Buckingham Palace! I wouldn't put it past Tony and Len to dig up some obsure bit of paper that says they've every right to go and smash her place down and evict her. And to think, that some misguided chumps on here were calling for that terrible duo to be knighted!! Check the archives: I know it's unbelievable, but that what was written on this pathetic, anti-traveller paper last year. Don't it make ye wonder about the sanity of some of the folk around? fearsiuil
  • Score: 0

1:08am Wed 12 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.
As the study isnt complete ans the Dr mentioned has stated he doesn't know why or when then its clear even he cant be sure of what he is stating until he has completed the study and then the report.

BTW you have changed what you have been saying the Dr said havent you?
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.[/p][/quote]As the study isnt complete ans the Dr mentioned has stated he doesn't know why or when then its clear even he cant be sure of what he is stating until he has completed the study and then the report. BTW you have changed what you have been saying the Dr said havent you? E-Types..
  • Score: 0

1:26am Wed 12 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

President3 wrote:
God Almighty wrote:
ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.
Couldn't agree more - and judging by the 'agree' and 'disagree' scores on each comment, 99% of this forum are in agreement.

ET thinks he is wise like a drunk man thinks he is sober.

Over the last year, we have had to put up with his drivel, his illiteracy, his baseless accusations and his legal threats - all of which amount to nothing.

He was full of cockiness before the High Court decision on DF, and now he is displaying all the traits of a very bad loser.

But hey-ho! Oh! How we laughed!
What is it you couldn't agree more with old scatty pants? Like to explain?

Im quite sure if i went on the EDL site and confronted an idiot like GA who was stating the earth was flat, id also find most would disagree when i said it was a sphere!

You see you old fascist, its not my comments, they on here, are disagreeing with, but ME!

And we all know why dont we you reprobate!

Doesn't that give the measure of them? A person may be right but he will still be wrong because of his culture! Sad really isn't it?

I see you have looked up "illiterate" and changed that to "illiteracy"! Seems you can be taught new things even by one such as I.

BTW you didn't have to put up with anything. You could of left anytime you liked... couldn't you? Or are you so hate filled you couldn't?

Can you provide one example of a "baseless accusation" I have made? Or is that in fact a baseless accusation?

You know the legal action in one guise or other is coming...but cuddle your comfort blanket till it does. You wont be missed out i promise you.

"He was full of cockiness before the High Court decision on DF"

I think you will find i wasn't on here before the high court decision! ia your mind going a bit?
Try rinse the hate out of it and you might have room for more clarity.

Can you explain what it is i have lost?


You do dribble on dont you?
[quote][p][bold]President3[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.[/p][/quote]Couldn't agree more - and judging by the 'agree' and 'disagree' scores on each comment, 99% of this forum are in agreement. ET thinks he is wise like a drunk man thinks he is sober. Over the last year, we have had to put up with his drivel, his illiteracy, his baseless accusations and his legal threats - all of which amount to nothing. He was full of cockiness before the High Court decision on DF, and now he is displaying all the traits of a very bad loser. But hey-ho! Oh! How we laughed![/p][/quote]What is it you couldn't agree more with old scatty pants? Like to explain? Im quite sure if i went on the EDL site and confronted an idiot like GA who was stating the earth was flat, id also find most would disagree when i said it was a sphere! You see you old fascist, its not my comments, they on here, are disagreeing with, but ME! And we all know why dont we you reprobate! Doesn't that give the measure of them? A person may be right but he will still be wrong because of his culture! Sad really isn't it? I see you have looked up "illiterate" and changed that to "illiteracy"! Seems you can be taught new things even by one such as I. BTW you didn't have to put up with anything. You could of left anytime you liked... couldn't you? Or are you so hate filled you couldn't? Can you provide one example of a "baseless accusation" I have made? Or is that in fact a baseless accusation? You know the legal action in one guise or other is coming...but cuddle your comfort blanket till it does. You wont be missed out i promise you. "He was full of cockiness before the High Court decision on DF" I think you will find i wasn't on here before the high court decision! ia your mind going a bit? Try rinse the hate out of it and you might have room for more clarity. Can you explain what it is i have lost? You do dribble on dont you? E-Types..
  • Score: -1

1:28am Wed 12 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
Thank you President 3. Have a nice day.
Oh dear, the bland thanking the bland
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: Thank you President 3. Have a nice day.[/p][/quote]Oh dear, the bland thanking the bland E-Types..
  • Score: -2

9:41am Sat 15 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

God Almighty wrote:
Thank you President 3. Have a nice day.
You might be aware now that stropmag/Gina the weaner 'two' of the more disturbed of the anti-Travellers on these threads has been using multiple accounts to use racial abuse (all while pretending to be black) he has had at least 8 accounts while doing this and was exposed on a thread where he stupidly replied for one alter ego using the another alter ego and then admitted he had be using another name.

This i believe is the sort of disturbed people you and users like you with your racial abuse and racial slurs have incited to carry out their vile illegal/unlawful attacks...you are just as guilty as they!
[quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: Thank you President 3. Have a nice day.[/p][/quote]You might be aware now that stropmag/Gina the weaner 'two' of the more disturbed of the anti-Travellers on these threads has been using multiple accounts to use racial abuse (all while pretending to be black) he has had at least 8 accounts while doing this and was exposed on a thread where he stupidly replied for one alter ego using the another alter ego and then admitted he had be using another name. This i believe is the sort of disturbed people you and users like you with your racial abuse and racial slurs have incited to carry out their vile illegal/unlawful attacks...you are just as guilty as they! E-Types..
  • Score: -3

9:41am Sat 15 Sep 12

E-Types.. says...

President3 wrote:
God Almighty wrote:
ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.
Couldn't agree more - and judging by the 'agree' and 'disagree' scores on each comment, 99% of this forum are in agreement.

ET thinks he is wise like a drunk man thinks he is sober.

Over the last year, we have had to put up with his drivel, his illiteracy, his baseless accusations and his legal threats - all of which amount to nothing.

He was full of cockiness before the High Court decision on DF, and now he is displaying all the traits of a very bad loser.

But hey-ho! Oh! How we laughed!
You might be aware now that stropmag/Gina the weaner 'two' of the more disturbed of the anti-Travellers on these threads has been using multiple accounts to use racial abuse (all while pretending to be black) he has had at least 8 accounts while doing this and was exposed on a thread where he stupidly replied for one alter ego using the another alter ego and then admitted he had be using another name.

This i believe is the sort of disturbed people you and users like you with your racial abuse and racial slurs have incited to carry out their vile illegal/unlawful attacks...you are just as guilty as they!
[quote][p][bold]President3[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]God Almighty[/bold] wrote: ET is a traveller who thinks travellers have an exotic ancestry but a recent genetic study by the Royal College of Surgeons and Edinburgh University (the Wilson Cavalleri report) says travellers are just ordinary Irish people who were dispossessed somewhere between 1k and 2k years ago, nothing exotic about that. Trouble is ET doesn't like that cos it contradicts his beliefs so he has been denying the report exists for months. I have even given him links to press reports on the DNA study (one above) but for some reason thats not good enough for him, he is still trying to deny it exists. On another story he is trying to argue that Council houses aren't owned by the Council, ha ha, what an idiot, LMFAO. Can't be bothered arguing with a numpty like that any more.[/p][/quote]Couldn't agree more - and judging by the 'agree' and 'disagree' scores on each comment, 99% of this forum are in agreement. ET thinks he is wise like a drunk man thinks he is sober. Over the last year, we have had to put up with his drivel, his illiteracy, his baseless accusations and his legal threats - all of which amount to nothing. He was full of cockiness before the High Court decision on DF, and now he is displaying all the traits of a very bad loser. But hey-ho! Oh! How we laughed![/p][/quote]You might be aware now that stropmag/Gina the weaner 'two' of the more disturbed of the anti-Travellers on these threads has been using multiple accounts to use racial abuse (all while pretending to be black) he has had at least 8 accounts while doing this and was exposed on a thread where he stupidly replied for one alter ego using the another alter ego and then admitted he had be using another name. This i believe is the sort of disturbed people you and users like you with your racial abuse and racial slurs have incited to carry out their vile illegal/unlawful attacks...you are just as guilty as they! E-Types..
  • Score: -3

2:48pm Thu 20 Sep 12

E--Types says...

Seems admin are now aware of the shysters on here manipulating the threads. Hopefully that will now be a thing of the past.
Seems admin are now aware of the shysters on here manipulating the threads. Hopefully that will now be a thing of the past. E--Types
  • Score: -1

3:49pm Thu 20 Sep 12

E -Types says...

E--Types wrote:
Seems admin are now aware of the shysters on here manipulating the threads. Hopefully that will now be a thing of the past.
We can but hope !
[quote][p][bold]E--Types[/bold] wrote: Seems admin are now aware of the shysters on here manipulating the threads. Hopefully that will now be a thing of the past.[/p][/quote]We can but hope ! E -Types
  • Score: 1

4:29pm Thu 20 Sep 12

E--Types says...

E -Types wrote:
E--Types wrote:
Seems admin are now aware of the shysters on here manipulating the threads. Hopefully that will now be a thing of the past.
We can but hope !
You are of couse aware that a new law dealing with antics such as yours on these threads will be soon in place. Your actions will be considered cyberstalking and will be convictable as such.

I have all intentions of holding you responsible for helping to incite racial abuse, by your masquerading as me to undermine by defence of my community, against posters racially abusing us. Whether that worries you or not is not of any interest to us.

Admin have indeed looked at your posts on threads.. how do i know? They told me!
[quote][p][bold]E -Types[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E--Types[/bold] wrote: Seems admin are now aware of the shysters on here manipulating the threads. Hopefully that will now be a thing of the past.[/p][/quote]We can but hope ![/p][/quote]You are of couse aware that a new law dealing with antics such as yours on these threads will be soon in place. Your actions will be considered cyberstalking and will be convictable as such. I have all intentions of holding you responsible for helping to incite racial abuse, by your masquerading as me to undermine by defence of my community, against posters racially abusing us. Whether that worries you or not is not of any interest to us. Admin have indeed looked at your posts on threads.. how do i know? They told me! E--Types
  • Score: -1

7:40pm Thu 20 Sep 12

E -Types says...

E--Types wrote:
E -Types wrote:
E--Types wrote:
Seems admin are now aware of the shysters on here manipulating the threads. Hopefully that will now be a thing of the past.
We can but hope !
You are of couse aware that a new law dealing with antics such as yours on these threads will be soon in place. Your actions will be considered cyberstalking and will be convictable as such.

I have all intentions of holding you responsible for helping to incite racial abuse, by your masquerading as me to undermine by defence of my community, against posters racially abusing us. Whether that worries you or not is not of any interest to us.

Admin have indeed looked at your posts on threads.. how do i know? They told me!
Good to know my views are getting a god airing and being well received .
[quote][p][bold]E--Types[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E -Types[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]E--Types[/bold] wrote: Seems admin are now aware of the shysters on here manipulating the threads. Hopefully that will now be a thing of the past.[/p][/quote]We can but hope ![/p][/quote]You are of couse aware that a new law dealing with antics such as yours on these threads will be soon in place. Your actions will be considered cyberstalking and will be convictable as such. I have all intentions of holding you responsible for helping to incite racial abuse, by your masquerading as me to undermine by defence of my community, against posters racially abusing us. Whether that worries you or not is not of any interest to us. Admin have indeed looked at your posts on threads.. how do i know? They told me![/p][/quote]Good to know my views are getting a god airing and being well received . E -Types
  • Score: 1

11:55pm Sat 22 Sep 12

E-Types... says...

They are certainly getting a good airing but as for being well received...well time will tell!
They are certainly getting a good airing but as for being well received...well time will tell! E-Types...
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree